similar to: AD DC as KVM guest on file server host?

Is kvm I/O realy disadventage? I use samba file server as kvm guest (LVM storage pool) in some setups and disn't notice any problems. Sequential read/write speed isn't noticeably different from non-virtualized samba host. Did I miss something and should expect sudden trouble? In a letter dated Tuesday, December 27, 2016 2:12:59 MSK by Andrei Petrov via samba wrote: > The most dramatic

It also occurs on several (different) test cases. I have founded that assershion rises in void ValueHandleBase::ValueIsDeleted(Value *V); Code from function: // All callbacks, weak references, and assertingVHs should be dropped by now. if (V->HasValueHandle) { #ifndef NDEBUG // Only in +Asserts mode... dbgs() << "While deleting: " << *V->getType()

The most dramatic disadventage of kvm guest is block device I/O, so I wouldn't recommend to virtualize file server if it is not necessary. In my case on host ntpd configured as source for virtual dc, and bind9 configured as type=slave for zones hosted on dc, (make shure that srv records in _msdcs.mysambadomain.local are resolving when virtual dc is down) and smbd fileserver with

27 нояб. 2015 г. 14:15 пользователь "Martin Kletzander" <mkletzan@redhat.com> написал: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 04:31:56PM +0100, Piotr Rybicki wrote: >> >> Hi. >> >> I would like to workaround a bug, when after live-migration of KVM >> guest, there is a 100% steal time shown in guest. >> >> I've read, that disabling

Hi Char, I found the problem, for some reason the last patch was applied correctly. Just committed the fixed version. Tried to compile axpy.cu, everything works. ------------- Best regards, Alexey Bataev 23.01.2019 13:37, treinz пишет: > Hi Alexey, > > I tried the b7195a6 from the llvm github mirror, which does include > your commit D46189 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D46189> (see

Hi Alexey, Thanks for the great work! The version I checked out works most of the time. But I do encounter crashes sometimes. I can't file a bug report on https://bugs.llvm.org/ because I don't have an account. I sent an email to bugs-admin at lists.llvm.org for an account already but I haven't heard back. Meanwhile, can you take a look at the issue? I'm attaching the bug report

Hi Alex, Eric and Valentin, Thanks for the information. I don't mean to push this but I'm in desperate need of debugging some cuda code. I'm not familiar with the llvm internal but it sounds like there's at least line info now, right? If so, can you point me to a branch of llvm that can help tracing the bug down to certain line of code. I believe my bug is simply a write/read

On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 04:25:55PM +0300, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: >27 нояб. 2015 г. 14:15 пользователь "Martin Kletzander" <mkletzan@redhat.com> >написал: >> >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 04:31:56PM +0100, Piotr Rybicki wrote: >>> >>> Hi. >>> >>> I would like to workaround a bug, when after live-migration of KVM >>> guest,

Hello. Guys, sorry for delay, I thinked about things, overlooked LLVM project in search of a suitable case. I have noticed that at this time in LLVM you actively implement the possibility of automatic parallelization. I am interested in this direction and I would like participate in a project Polly as my GSoC project. I have looked over todo list [1]. I really want to implement "Increase

Hi I've tried to get doxygen documentation by configuring with --enable-doxygen. Then 'make install' has been interrupted with message "error: configuration file /media/data/virtual/share/gsoc/build/docs/doxygen.cfg not found!". mikem, why did you remove a line "AC_CONFIG_FILES([docs/doxygen.cfg])" in autoconf/configure.ac [1] ? I've restored this line. Now

Fedor, Yes that is what happens in my case that the loop is fully unrolled and hence ‘removed’. My objection though is that there is still IR that could be dumped (i.e. the function containing the loop that was removed or the entire module) and that is what I want to have dumped after each pass when I specify -print-after-all. Of course there may be certain implementation details that could make

Hi Alexey, Just want to make sure I understand what you said because I'm not familiar with the llvm pipeline, it's this line: /net/gs/vol3/software/modules-sw/cuda/10.0/Linux/RHEL6/x86_64/bin/ptxas" -m64 -g --dont-merge-basicblocks --return-at-end -v --gpu-name sm_75 --output-file /tmp/60663577.1.login.q/testparticles-4fd988.o /tmp/60663577.1.login.q/testparticles-1d20c4.s that

Hi Alexey, Is there any option for clang to turn on debug for the host code only but not the device code? I've been using something like -ggdb3 -O0 but this generate debug info for both host and device. I'm trying to work around the aforementioned ptxas bug. Thanks, Char At 2019-02-28 02:09:54, "Alexey Bataev" <a.bataev at outlook.com> wrote: Hi Char, it looks like

Hi Alexey, Almost a year has passed and Nvidia finally fixes the ptxas issue in CUDA 10.2 according to: https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-toolkit-release-notes/index.html#cuda-compiler-resolved-issues However, I can not yet use it with llvm 9.0.0 release because CUDA 10.2 is not supported yet. Is there other branches of the llvm repo that supports CUDA 10.2 now? Or do I need to wait for llvm 10

And how libvirt checks that it trusts the CA? Just simply inspects the cacert.pem file? Or it has some information inside about by which CA were signed client and server certificates and then compares against stored values? I mean can I just concatenate after signing or I need to combine two CAs before generating libvirt's client and server certificates? пн, 10 дек. 2018 г. в 13:11, Daniel P.

On 07.07.2013 01:53, Александр wrote: > В письме от Воскресенье, 30-июн-2013 03:41:37 пользователь Александр написал: >> В письме от Вторник, 25-июн-2013 11:47:10 пользователь Michal Privoznik .... > > i have found source of problem, my code looks like this: > > int count = virConnectListAllDomains(connection, NULL, 0); > .... > domain = virDomainDefineXML(connection,

Hi. My plan would be: 1w Study sources of Polly and LLVM docs relating to analysis. 2w Create tests which demonstrate problems with NSW/NUW 3-4w Fix the handling of wrap overflows. 5w Complete middle term paperwork. 6w Create tests for each of cases which are not currently optimized (e.g. have min/max, sext/zext, trunc or unsigned comparisons in the loop bounds or memory accesses). 7w Learn how

Hi Alexey, I submitted the bug report to nvidia. While they are working on it, can you share some insight in what could potentially cause this? I just want to get a sense if such a bug require significant amount of work to fix, which can help me make some decision moving forward with my project. Thanks, Char At 2019-02-27 03:19:02, "Alexey Bataev" <a.bataev at outlook.com>

Hi Chandler, That's embarrassing how weird this part of clang is. I have a provisional patch which fixes the problem but underlines clang's problems. I will submit it tonight for comments. суббота, 18 октября 2014 г. пользователь Chandler Carruth написал: > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Anton Korobeynikov < > anton at korobeynikov.info >

Yes, I understand. I just don't understand why there are 15 review links. as to the format of the list, we previously had a list of feature for 4.5 (before it was fully supported), we can reuse this old format. Best regards, Alexey Bataev > 6 июня 2019 г., в 19:12, Narayanaswamy, Ravi <ravi.narayanaswamy at intel.com> написал(а): > > Alexey, > Johannes want to put all