similar to: How to avoid CIFS timeout?

Hello Zhiye, On my opinion, you can improve the CIFS performance instead of avoiding CIFS timeout. Such as extend read/write size and change the cache type. I don't think enable "async smb echo handler" is a good choice for your situation. This option will depress performance. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Zhiye via samba Wang" <samba at

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:42:20 -0800 Peter Carlson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 1/29/24 13:08, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:51:37 -0800 > > Peter Carlson via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > >> Just did a quick test, the big T comes after setting permissions in > >>

Hi Samba users, We would like to use samba for re-exporting our other distributed file system (BeeGFS). However, we found that the meta data operations are very slow (dir stat, removal etc.). On SMB client the performance is more than 30x slow than on the SMB server. We would expect some slowness but this is too big a drop. This is the result on CIFS client $ sudo mdtest -b 10 -I 10 -L -z 2

Hi, I have no issues uncompressing Linux kernel tarball on the samba share but getting Permission denied while compilation. What could cause this issue? init/calibrate.o: Permission deniedinit/calibrate.o: failedmake[1]: *** [init/calibrate.o] Error 1make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... CC fs/autofs/inode.ofs/autofs/init.o: Permission deniedfs/autofs/init.o: failedmake[2]: ***

On 1/29/24 13:08, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:51:37 -0800 > Peter Carlson via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >> Just did a quick test, the big T comes after setting permissions in >> windows >> >> root at fs1:/var/log# cd /data >> root at fs1:/data# mkdir -m 1777 test2 > No it doesn't, you are setting

I know "hard" means command will hang if network is broken. But it seems that's not actuate. It's CPU that will hang. Affected scope: I tested it against CentOS 5/6/7, it can be reproduced on all the systems. the debug logs below are captured from CentOS 7 (cifs.ko v2.05) How to reproduce this problem? 1. mount a cifs share with option "hard" 2. stop samba

Hi, I have a regression test suite that creates this simple share: [tmp] comment = Temp Directory guest ok = Yes path = /tmp read only = No This is mounted via SMB1: mount //localhost/tmp -o guest,vers=1.0 /mnt The client (ubuntu 18.10 dev) is using cifs-utils 2:6.8-2 from debian (it's a sync). Client and server are the same machine (localhost). When the server is

I am new to R. I just tried to recreate in R (using sem package and the identical input data) a solution for a simple measurment model I have found before in LISREL. LISREL had no problems and converged in just 3 iterations. In sem, I got no solution, just the warning message: "Could not compute QR decomposition of Hessian. Optimization probably did not converge. in: sem.default(ram =

hi Stefan / all, resurrecting this thread ? On 9/26/19 9:19 PM, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > try to use a newer version of Samba 4.7 is already outdated. The Problem > the smb-protocol and not Samba it self. As Steve French mentioned on the > last SambaXP it will be much better with Linux 5.x. So maybe you try a > new kernel root at plattentest:~# uname -a Linux plattentest

Hi Ivan, Not sure if you have found a solution or not since your post was back in February, but I thought I'd reply as this is the only thread I could find anywhere that mentions a problem that I was having on a recent installation of Arch Linux. A few minutes after boot all of my CIFS/Samba mounts would go offline and I'd get an error "The host is down." But I could unmount

Hello, I finally run my measurement model in sem - successfully. Now, I am trying to print out the path diagram that is based on the results - but for some reason it's not working. Below is my script - but the problem is probably in my very last line: # ANALYSIS OF ANXIETY, DEPRESSION, AND FEAR - LISREL P.31 library(sem) # Creating the ANXIETY, DEPRESSION, AND FEAR intercorrelation matrix

Hi everyone, I have a very annoying character encoding problem. Have a look to this: # ls -l M*mo-1.* -rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 8417218 6 sept. 2013 Mémo-1.aif -rwxr--r-- 1 hope hope 8417218 6 sept. 2013 Mémo-1.aif -rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 363175 6 sept. 2013 Mémo-1.m4a -rwxr--r-- 1 hope hope 363175 6 sept. 2013 Mémo-1.m4a Yes, it looks like two files have exactly the same name, but

Also from my observation, based on network packets and time measurements, it seems the CIFS clients haven't done any sort of cache. For example, doing a "ls" for 5 times on the same folder within a short period of time. The network packet sizes are almost equal every time and the time it takes is similar. Isn't there supposed to be some page cache or dentry cache that could

hi there, running a simple test like time for s in $(seq 0 9999); do echo hello > world-$s; done takes a little more than a minute on a locally mounted test share on our samba server. the same test finishes in about 5 seconds when it is run on the server's file system, without samba. i understand that dealing with many small files isn't exactly the sweet spot of any (networked) file

Sorry for the delayed response, Louis, I'm not sure how to tell about having "cifs/UPN" - Please advise. I was able to mount with sec=krb5 after the user is logged in but that does not help getting "home" mounted during the login. But here is where I am now: I have been able to pam_mount "home" during the login but could not get the ACLs during the mount

Hi, I'm trying to backup a directory on a Windows 2008 (fully updated) I'm running Debian testing. (kernel version: 4.9.6-3, mount.cifs version: 6.6) I'm basically mounting a share with mount -t cifs and tar the content of a directory. I didn't have problems with old debian (probably sqeeze). Now I occasionally get in dmesg: cifs vfs: error -32 sending data on socket to

## QUESTION I am sharing a 120GB folder with lots of files via Samba on a LAN (1Gbps connection). 1) Doing an `ls -lR` on the server (on this folder) takes ~32 seconds, compared with **72 minutes** on the client. Is this difference in performance expected (due to network and protocol overhead)? 2) While the client is executing an `ls -lR`, one smbd process on the server uses about 30-40% of a

On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 16:43:26 -0300 Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote: > Okay. How do I know if the command really ran correctly? :D You ran: samba-tool drs replicate dc2 dc3 DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=campus,DC=sertao,DC=ifrs,DC=edu,DC=br -d10 and got an error message. If you run: samba-tool drs replicate dc2 dc3 DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=campus,DC=sertao,DC=ifrs,DC=edu,DC=br

Well, apparently there WAS a change on the Windows Server, which only affected new samba versions I was able to fix my issue by using this patch: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12776 Can this be officially fixed please? >-----Original Message----- >From: Lange Norbert >Sent: Dienstag, 08. August 2017 10:04 >To: samba at lists.samba.org >Subject: Smbclient cant

I'd like to to put the hard drives in standby mode during periods of no activity. I'm just running a file server plus a couple small things on a Qube 3 from home, although the web stuff will increase it's still minimal. On my NetBSD systems I can use atactl to do this via: mount -u -o async,noatime,nodevmtime / mount -u -o async,noatime /usr atactl wd0 setidle 5 [wait a time]