similar to: ldaps:// referrals from DC

Hi Marc, thank you for your quick response! On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 17:44 +0100, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: > > I haven't tried it, but what is wrong with STARTTLS? Nothing is wrong with STARTTLS (if the client supports it)! In my case I disabled referrals chasing in roundcube, as workaround. The reason I ask here is: MS DC gives a different response, and looks more

On 13/08/2014 16:27, Charles Lepple wrote: >> The blew one had the serial number, so I'm left with two different UPSes >> from the serial number point of view. >> I wonder if an empty serial number is a valid serial number! > I haven't tried it, but an empty string (that is, iSerial is not zero, > but the string has length zero) should match the regex "".

> From: Jens Kraemer <jk at jkraemer.net> > Subject: Re: [Ferret-talk] Performance before and after optimization > On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 08:49:17PM +0800, Alex Neth wrote: > [..] >> 2) Can I keep a second index so that it doesn''t get locked during >> optimization and then switch to the optimized index? Perhaps the >> index >> is not really

Thanks Stuart. I thought I had read somewhere that rebuild_index built the index in a different location and then swapped it, but after looking at the code (in local_index.rb) this doesn''t appear to be the case. That might explain why the ferret server crashes sometimes when a search takes place during a reindex. I wouldn''t be doing exactly the same thing as this but

Goodmorning, I'm looking for a package that can help me to calculate the most probable number for a series of diluition. Can you help me? That you Riccardo Rasera --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dott.Agr.Rasera Riccardo Dipartimento Territorio e Sistemi Agro-Forestali Sezione Patologia Vegetale Agripolis - Viale dell'Universit?, 16

Thanks for the response Jens. Indeed I am sorting by something other than relevancy, so that would explain it. Optimized, it''s extremely fast and handles a good load, but new records kill it until I optimize. I haven''t tried :merge_factor as I wasn''t aware of it. I''m not sure it will help given the above. Regarding the re-index locking code,

Dear R-friends, the dataset I am using (data.it) is organized as follows partner stp btp reg hk 0.64 1 s ger 0.27 1 d tur 0.27 1 s rom 0.24 1 s-f por 0.24 1 s spa 0.23 1 s gre 0.22 1 d-f aus 0.17 1 d uk 0.16 1 s be 0.16 1 d arg 0.15 1 s usa 0.13 1 d-f fra 0.13 1 s neth

Hello everybody, we're trying to set-up Samba to share directories with Win users from some Linux servers. We've set up kerberos, gotten a ticket, joined the server to the domain, we get correct users/groups from "wbinfo" and "getent". The problem lies in "id": it does not update its user<->group mappings when they change on AD, even if

On 14/08/2014 14:51, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Marcello Vezzelli > <m.vezzelli at e-works.it> wrote: >> I've found another strange issue that prevented me to test this solution. >> VMware ESXi is filtering out serial number information, together with >> iManufacturer and iProduct. > Is it a permissions issue? The NUT udev

Hello, The code below works fine up until I try to use the "IN" statement in the last line. The proper SQL format is: SELECT * FROM this_table WHERE this_column IN (1,2,3,4,5) But, I think I may be getting something like: SELECT * FROM this_table WHERE this_column IN c(1,2,3,4,5) Which makes no sense in SQL. I think it may be just a matter of string massaging, but I'm not

[please keep the list CC'd. Thanks!] On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Marcello Vezzelli <mv at 3cx.com> wrote: > I noticed that 2 of Sweex UPS have an identical serial number 20100813, > which looks like a date. > The other one has an empty serial number. > > The blew one had the serial number, so I'm left with two different UPSes > from the serial number point of

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Marcello Vezzelli <m.vezzelli at e-works.it> wrote: > I've found another strange issue that prevented me to test this solution. > VMware ESXi is filtering out serial number information, together with > iManufacturer and iProduct. Is it a permissions issue? The NUT udev configuration file changes the ownership and permissions to allow the NUT

Hi folks, Firstly, the first: dovecot --version 2.2.10 dovecot -n # 2.2.10: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.10.0-514.16.1.el7.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core) auth_debug = yes auth_krb5_keytab = /var/lib/dovecot/krb5.keytab auth_master_user_separator = * auth_mechanisms = plain login gssapi auth_verbose = yes debug_log_path = /dev/null default_process_limit = 400

Hi everyone, I installed latest version of Nut on Debian Wheezy 64bit. This is a virtual server hosted by VMware ESXi. It's a Nagios monitoring server. I configured one Sweex UPS in ups.conf and everything is working. ups.conf: [sweex1] driver = blazer_usb port = auto runtimecal = 1100,100,2200,50 Now I want to connect two more identical UPSes to the same server, total of 3

Hi. my name is Giacomo Sanchietti and I'm working for a company called Nethesis. We are working on a CentOS derived distribution like SME Server. It's a minimal CentOS with a software layer on top to add a web configuration interface. The CD iso, it's a CentOS minimal CD with some extras packages from centos-base yum group, and a kickstart file to automatize the installation

My name is James Hammond. We've worked on previous and current projects. We've been working on a multitude of projects...paying our fees and building our downlines. Have you noticed a big enough return for your efforts? Or, is it more of a scenario where you may see some profit, watch your downline unfold as they realise their downline isn't paying, and then be left paying a fee to

All, If I set up a BDC with a replicated ldap server, can I point the "ldap backend" and "idmap backend" options *both* to the localhost and enable a referral on the slave so that writes (ie Idmap updates) will be referred to the master server? I'm running debian unstable with openldap 2.4 (and libs) and Samba 3.0.30. I know I should use the new idmap interface but this

Hello, I am looking to replace my company's Avaya Merlin Magix system with an Asterisk based PBX when our current lease is up. I had a meeting with upper management yesterday, and they would like some assurance that other companies are running Asterisk with success. We are a relatively small company, with about 70 total extensions. I would be purchasing a Dell Poweredge 2850

>From /opt/src/dovecot-2.2.19/doc/wiki/PasswordDatabase.ExtraFields.Host.txt > Login referrals are an IMAP extension specified by RFC 2221 > [http://www.apps.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2221.html]. They're not supported by many > clients, so you probably don't want to use them normally. Right. > The following clients are known to support login referrals: > > * Pine > *

On 12/3/15 1:32 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > As long as Dovecot doesn't return any login-referrals (which it doesn't > by default), I don't see why having LOGIN-REFERRALS in the CAPABILITY > reply would matter. Because a compatible client will use the capability as advertised by the server, and then fail because the server is not honouring its promise. One can hide the