similar to: valid users with AD group

Thanks very much for the quick response/info sir Server is joined to the domain, which, I think, the info I listed demonstrates, apologies if not sssd has nothing to do with Samba. >>I somewhat understand that sir. I listed mainly to provide info on auth methods and services on the host. In case not listing affected diagnosis, and just in case samba did something different interacting on

On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 13:50:09 -0600 jsl6uy js16uy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello all, hope all is well/happy holidays > > Issues with an old thread out there, valid users containing an AD > group > > Have tried this on systems running cent7u2 and ubuntu trusty. These > systems are running sssd. I can login with AD users and chown/chgrp > file

Hello all, and hope all is well Has anyone installed / on an nvme ssd for Cent 7? Would anyone know if that is supported? I have installed using Arch Linux, but at the time, mid last year, had to patch grub to recognize nvme. Arch is obviously running a much more recent kernel. Not afraid todo some empirical leg work. Just asking if anyone had tried already thanks all for any/all help regards

Thanks again very much sir Will definitely try this path and report back On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> wrote: > On 11.07.2016 17:46, jsl6uy js16uy wrote: > > Thanks much sir > > Ease I think mainly > > adding a macvtap is pretty quick, performant and works. And last but > > definitely not least, ignorance of other quick

Hi list, After the badlock patching of all samba machines in our organization (all of them are domain members), some functionalities have stopped working, more particularly: - wbinfo -g (no output at all) - wbinfo -u (no output at all) - getent passwd (displays only local users) - getent group working functionalities: - samba shares

Thanks much for the the reply! Some sec updates/bug fixes have been applied thru the run of 6u5 and after, but yes, still firmly in 6u5 land. Guess will have to test. Broadwell cpus do run in the OS, but "6u5" is stated as not supporting 26XXv4 chipsets. regards On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:56 PM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > On 6/15/2016 2:48 PM, jsl6uy

Thanks much sir Ease I think mainly adding a macvtap is pretty quick, performant and works. And last but definitely not least, ignorance of other quick easy solutions. Well, also macvtap works on older hardware where I don't have physical functions to passthrough via sr-iov, that is what you are pointing to with "macvtaps in the most outer one VM and pass them thru to inner layer

Hi list, I'd like to update you on the issue, as I did some more tests. First, I've added some directives to smb.conf (in italic): [global] netbios name = testserver security = ADS workgroup = EXAMPLE realm = EXAMPLE.COM log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log log level = 10 dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab kerberos method

Hello all, hope all is well this maybe outside of libvirt-users.... Can you nest macvtap devices to ultimately receive a real routable ip on the nested vm? I have a nested vm up and running. Both vm and nested vm are centos 7 on arch linux host. The first vm uses a macvtap in bridge mode receives dhcp from an external dhcp server. I start the second vm and dhclient hangs and never receives an

Hello, all. Hope all is well Is it possible to install kernel and support files from 6u7 into a base 6u5 image to achieve full broadwell support in 6u5? We are "locked", clearly not fully since willing to up jump kernels, on 6u5. Thanks for any and all help

Apologies if this has been gone over, but I believe I have checked the intertubes more than a bit..... I am using libvirt and have vms booting under an OVMF.fd to use an efi firmware. I can create vms, linux ubuntu, and they will boot up. However, everytime I reboot am I dropped into the default efi shell provide by the tianocore build. Then I must walk the FS to the booting efi app and run, in

Hello all, hope all is well Was wondering if I'm doing something wrong/missing something. I have pxe+tftp+uefi working between 2 vms. However after the build is done and I reboot, I still come up to pxe b/c tianocore always starts, from what I've seen, with trying PXE first. Great for initial builds :) but I would like to it stop after. In the xml I am pointing to the disk to boot first.

Thanks VERY MUCH for all the info and help! Apologies for the extreme delay. I got distracted by other threads that forced out this work to later date. Also some frustration as well. ;) I completely missed this update. Apologies and thanks Will be diving back into this shortly! On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote: > On 03/21/16 19:53, jsl6uy js16uy

Hello, I have a CentOS 7 server, right installed. I notice that some packages that are present at http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/updates/x86_64/Packages/ are not present yet at some other mirrors (that are the ones my fastestmirror plugin picks up... even after a clean): http://centos.datente.com/media/7/updates/x86_64/Packages/ or

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

On a server Centos 7 with samba-4.2.3-11.el7_2.x86_64, joined to a server samba-3.6.23-24.el6_7.x86_64 PDC on Centos 6.7 up to date, after 7 days I want restart winbind service because the users are not autenticate anymore. This is the error into log file: > Feb  4 10:15:26 s-graph smbd[28960]: [2016/02/04 10:15:26.529467,  0] > ../auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c:236(ntlmssp_check_packet) >

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0006 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0006.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 31f1dd0fe437e35f2f1ccb56a6baf9da6cb2227582f405506097437826c5651a ctdb-4.2.3-11.el7_2.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:0448 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0448.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 8c3cc313c91dd609e0548a46d3e4d2934d57a57e3cd44736cbc0f0d825e6206c ctdb-4.2.3-12.el7_2.x86_64.rpm

Hi We've recently had a few windows 10 machines active on the network and are experiencing a strange issue in the output of smbstatus. By the end of the day a windows 10 machine may be listed dozens of times in the PID listing, with the expected user once but then dozens of nobody:nobody entries also associated with the same machine / PID. eg: a trimmed view.. Samba version 4.2.3 PID

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When