similar to: Doubt about Global Catalog on Samba 4

> You seem to be missing two FSMO roles: > DomainDnsZonesMasterRole > ForestDnsZonesMasterRole > Just what version of Samba are you using ? My Samba 4.5.2 domain also appears to be missing these roles. Can I simply seize these roles? [root at larkin27 ~]# samba-tool fsmo show SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=TEMP2008R2DC,CN=Servers,.. InfrastructureMasterRole owner:

On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 19:45 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > You seem to be missing two FSMO roles: > > > DomainDnsZonesMasterRole > > > ForestDnsZonesMasterRole > > > Just what version of Samba are you using ? > > My Samba 4.5.2 domain also appears to be missing these roles. > > Can I simply seize these roles? > > [root at larkin27 ~]#

> > Initially, it appears to have worked. ... > > It shows the same on one of the S4 DCs, but the > > DomainDnsZonesMasterRole still shows as "no current owner" on the > > third S4 DC [all Sernet 4.5.2].  Argh. > You could try checking the database on the third DC, 'samba-tool > dbcheck --help' for more info. > You could also try forcing

Hi, I have jointed 2 Samba 4 servers in my domain and transferred FSMO roles to the primary Samba 4 server. I have verified that the Samba 4 servers are OK, but I am having trouble removing the latest DC Windows Server 2008. It reports that there is no other DC to transfer data from the directory DC = DomainDNSZones, DC = Enterprise, DC = com, DC = br However the functions are all on my DC

Attempting to move FSMO roles from one SerNET Samba 4.5.4 DC to another, all roles transfered except the DNS related ones - those fail with an LDAP_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS [root at larkin28 ~]# samba-tool fsmo show SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=LARKIN28,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=micore,DC=us InfrastructureMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS

On 11/01/2023 18:56, Thorsten Marquardt via samba wrote: > > Am 11.01.23 um 16:24 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> Yes and it shows what I started with, you have two SRV records for the >> PDC_Emulator, delete the old one. >> >> Rowland > > I did and stopped samba on the old server. But my problem remains. I to > can not connect to

Recently tried transferring roles from Samba 4.3.11 to Samba 4.7.0. Ultimately, both dcs agreed that the 4.7.0 dc (dc3) had all the roles and replication and the databases were in good shape. However, during the process, I got a lot of errors that seemed to magically disappear. Should I be worried? root at dc3:~# samba-tool fsmo show SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS

On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 08:38:16 -0500 Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam at whitemice.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 19:45 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > You seem to be missing two FSMO roles: > > > > DomainDnsZonesMasterRole > > > > ForestDnsZonesMasterRole > > > > Just what version of Samba are you using ? > > > My Samba 4.5.2

I am transfer using 'samba-tool fsmo transfer --role=all I am try demote Windows using DCPROMO.EXE on Windows Server The output of command, no errors. (CN=GTESTE2 = Samba DC) root at gteste2:/anderson# root at gteste2:/anderson# *samba-tool fsmo show* SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS

Thank you so far. But unfortunately I could not fix the problems. So I decided to start over again at a situation where all the fsmo roles resides on the old controller. Here is a transcript of what I did and the errors reported: The inititial position srv-kb-dc1:~ # samba-tool fsmo show SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SRV-KB-PRIMDC,CN=Servers,CN=Default-Fi...

Hello, dc3 = principal DC dc4 = secondary DC I had this problem last month after updating samba to version 4.10.x. and also the schema from 45 to 69. But it looked like it had been corrected. Today I noticed that on dc4 there are computers that are not on dc3. I updated: 4.7.x to 4.8.x 4.8.x to 4.9.x and only after that I upgrade to 4.10.x version. When I run these commands: samba-tool

Am 31.07.19 um 17:54 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > Am 31.07.19 um 17:33 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > >> Which is the DC with FSMO roles, if its DC1 then move them to pre01svdeb03.pilsbacher.at >> Remove/purge this DC and join clean again. ( no need to reinstall os etc. just samba ) > > What? > > uninstall samba? > or unjoin from domain

I've been thinking if it's better to make a new Samba 4 DC server instead upgrade the old DC and then transfer the FSMO roles to it and shut down the old server. This way the installation would be cleaner and free of any errors of the old installation. I'm using Samba 4.2.1 and the result of command below is: root at EMPRESA:~# samba-tool fsmo show InfrastructureMasterRole owner:

hi mathias let me confirm your statement so.. you think if we demote those 2 DC server that already offline, the DNS will be running well well if this is one of option we have, i will consider to upgrade our FSMO DC from samba 4.1.X to 4.4.x , by the way, are there any consideration if we update samba directly from 4.1 to 4.4 ? let me answer some of your question *1 - what command are you

I have the Active Directory domain with Windows 2008 R2 domain controller and Samba domain controller on CentOS 7. Samba is 4.3.5 (self-compiled). Forest and domain levels are Windows 2008 R2. After joining Samba to the domain as the domain controller there were no DC=ForestDnsZones and DC=DomainDnsZones records on "OUTBOUND NEIGHBORS". I fixed it with ntdsutil, as it's written here

Hai,   Now, differences is fine, but can you see if one of the 2 servers is correct, and for that it might be handy to share the output.   You can push the good DB to the other DC. ( a forced replication )   And i can understand why you upgrade ...  Did you see :    samba-tool domain schemaupgrade --help Usage: samba-tool domain schemaupgrade [options] Domain schema upgrading Options:   -h,

Hi Thanks for you answer 1. Sorry It was a mistype: The version is samba_4.3.8+dfsg-1~bpo80+1. I backported from stretch to jessie as I want to keep my Debian environment clean. I do not fancy to compile it from source. I am a bit old fashion :-) :-) :-) 2. I use PDC and SDC as a legacy from previous versions. I Undestand why it is outdated but actually, even in Samba4, It is kind of true:

I have a samba dc which i recently upgraded to 4.6.4. I was looking at updating the functional level as it currently returns: Forest function level: (Windows) 2000 Domain function level: (Windows) 2000 Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2000 There is only a single DC (this host). According to the documentation 2000 isn’t even supported anymore:

On 07/23/2019 03:16 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > Did you actually read my last post ???? > > If you only transferred 5 of the roles, which of the SEVEN roles did > you not transfer ? My bad, I transferred all 7 roles: SchemaMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=ATHENA,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=edm-inc,DC=com InfrastructureMasterRole

Replication has been running smoothly until I upgraded to 4.5.0. I had various errors with all BDCs and a force sync didn't resolve it. I shutdown all BDCs, demoted them with --remove-other-dead-server then joined new BDCs with new names. At first replication was intermittently failing (consecutive failures counter kept resetting), but it seemed OK, just slow if anything. Now they all