similar to: Importing Computer DNS entries

Hello, If i create the record manually, is the record will follow the computer when it'll change his IP (DHCP) ? Thank you On Dec 12 2016, at 5:12 pm, Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Am 12.12.2016 um 11:01 schrieb contact--- via samba: > I have a Samba 4.5 AD classic upgraded from a Samba 3 PDC. (classicupgrade > steps from

Hi By not appearing as zone by default in the integrated dns to samba 4 (BIND9_DLZ), is then added manually and it works perfectly; to join a second domain controller and perform the relevant steps are added the second domain controller as in the reverse zone is not the same as NS. How do I add it? cd1.abc.cu and cd2.abc.cu In the direct zone in the dns Name server (NS) cd1.abc.cu Name server

Hi all, A bit of back story. A few years back we upgraded our Samba3 domain to Samba4 using the classicupgrade method. After a few stumbles we got there and now have 9 DC's globally all running 4.5.0. We dropped the ball when naming our domain and now need to change it. This has led me down the path of attempting to join a Windows Server 2008 R2 machine as a DC and then run the RENDOM tool

Hi Marc, Thanks for your reply. We are using BIND9_DLZ currently as the DNS backend I manually selected a replication partner (the FSMO roles DC). We do have some errors when doing a dbcheck but I'm not able to fix them. I've detailed this in another post. Here is an example of each type: Example1: *ERROR: incorrect GUID component for member in object

Hello, sorry, but I cannot find start of this discussion thread, so my question may be stupid. Is your domain classicupgraded from Samba 3 or provisioned from scratch? I have similar problem with our domain which is upgraded. If I provision the new domain everything works, but in old domain there is something broken inside. For Rowland: Does exist utility with similar function as "net rpc

I have an old Centos5/Samba3.5 domain with LDAP backend that I am attempting to migrate to the latest Samba 4.2 on Centos 7.1. Samba in both cases has been installed using Sernet packages. I had successfully run the classicupgrade process, but in subsequent testing found that in the 3.5 domain all the computer accounts have the posixAccount class and therefore have a uidNumber.

Hi Marc, I appreciate that you reply, but I got it resolved by following the advice of Mathias. I was aware of the links below, however the first is about using the BIND9_DLZ backend, and at the time I experienced the issue I was using the internal one. Marc & Mathias, The 2nd link that Marc references is about a DC should not use itself for DNS queries is exactly the opposite of your

On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:48:04 +0100 Alex Crow via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 14/08/16 19:37, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 19:18:41 +0100 > > Alex Crow via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >>> Ok, lets just run through this: > >>> You have an NT4-style PDC > >>

On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 07:48 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > Anyone? Can you please post a gdb backtrace --full? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 862 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL:

On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 18:02:19 +0100 Alex Crow via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi List, > > I have just reproduced this issue with Sernet Samba 4.4.5. I did a > migration from classic on a new VM, and this time created the next DC > on a new IP. As soon as I issued "samba-tool domain demote > --remove-other-dead-server=<original DC name>". I

Hi all, Thank you Mark for these precisions. I did switch a DC to --dns-backend=NONE using samba-tool domain join. This removed dns-<DCname> user for this DC and associated keytab. We changed /etc/resolv.conf to use another DC - one with Bind running - as nameserver. Stopping there, running samba_dnsupdate gave error "NOTAUTH". As we want our DC being able to push into DNS

> So, you are using Samba without problem, it is just that when you try > to use Bind9 instead of the internal dns server, your problems start. > > Let's just recap > > You have run 'samba_upgradedns' > You have altered smb.conf > You have configured 'named.conf' correctly > The Samba 'named.conf' file is readable by 'named' (this

Classic upgrade failing with 4.6-test (4.6.0rc3-GIT-1f2ebda) : Running: samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/usr/local/samba.PDC/dbdir/ --realm=example.com --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ --use-xattrs=yes /usr/local/samba.PDC/etc/smb.PDC.conf Gives: samba-tool domain classicupgrade: error: no such option: --use-xattrs If --use-xattrs=yes is removed: samba-tool domain classicupgrade

On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 19:18:41 +0100 Alex Crow via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > Ok, lets just run through this: > > You have an NT4-style PDC > Correct. > > You classicupgrade this to a DC > Yes, with BIND9_DLZ DNS backend. > > > You join another computer as a DC > > > > At this point, have you checked that all DNS

On 08/28/2015 03:56 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/08/15 23:23, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> So as I said, I grabbed EVERYTHING that was in the /etc/samba dir >> along with ALL .tbd files and ran: >> >> # samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/root/samba.PDC/dbdir/ >> --use-xattrs=yes --realm=home.htt --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ >>

Hello Marc, I appreciate your response, as well as the other members. Reading your answer, I believe I found what I wanted. Option 3, the principle is what I need right now. I'll try to explain. Today in production, we have the samba3 + openldap. The samba3 is installed on a freebsd, but has some problems that we can not detect. My boss does not want to drop the openldap now. We have

Hi all. Problems resolved! I found the samba process that was increasing the memory after I ran the netstat from PID and I discovered that the process opened 88/464 tcp/udp port. After I ran tcpdump program in my DC server listening udp 88 port and I found many clients machines sending traffic a lot to my DC server. I blocked the ips from clients machines by iptables and the samba process

Hi all, How to configure Samba to remove DNS service from DC? I thought there was an option for samba_dnsupgrade command to tell "remove all DNS service from current DC" but I don't find it anymore. This question is because we are about to deploy an AD with 20 or more DC and there is no need they are all DNS servers. In fact having them all DNS servers make design more complex and

So as I said, I grabbed EVERYTHING that was in the /etc/samba dir along with ALL .tbd files and ran: # samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/root/samba.PDC/dbdir/ --use-xattrs=yes --realm=home.htt --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ /root/samba.PDC/etc/smb.conf ANd it resulted in (note ldap error): Reading smb.conf NOTE: Service printers is flagged unavailable. NOTE: Service print$ is flagged

Hai, ? i was reading: ? http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO#Testing_DNS? which stats : Don't use BIND9_FLATFILE! It's not documented and supported!? ? This is wrong imo.? ? bind9_flatefile works fine, it just does not support multi master dns, and bind9_DLZ does. so you must setup a master/slave setup for bind9 with flatfile ? If you need to run a network with