similar to: port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED

On 2016-12-04 09:11, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 04 Dec 2016 08:01:09 -0600 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I have two DC's running Samba 4.5.0 and the "dtdc03" log.samba is >> showing the following: >> >> root at dtdc03:~# tail -f /usr/local/samba/var/log.samba >> [2016/12/01

On 2016-12-04 10:25, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 04 Dec 2016 09:43:25 -0600 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 2016-12-04 09:11, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Sun, 04 Dec 2016 08:01:09 -0600 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I have two DC's running

On Sun, 04 Dec 2016 08:01:09 -0600 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I have two DC's running Samba 4.5.0 and the "dtdc03" log.samba is > showing the following: > > root at dtdc03:~# tail -f /usr/local/samba/var/log.samba > [2016/12/01 10:14:39.167794, 0] > ../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_sock.c:245(continue_ip_open_socket)

On Sun, 04 Dec 2016 09:43:25 -0600 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 2016-12-04 09:11, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On Sun, 04 Dec 2016 08:01:09 -0600 > > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> I have two DC's running Samba 4.5.0 and the "dtdc03"

On 2016-11-21 04:01, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hi Bob, > > Sorry for the late responce, i was out for the weekend. > > I saw you got it fixed, good. ;-) > > Good to know its a bug. Thanks Rowland for pointing that out. > > ( added that in the script. ) > > @Marc, this is nothing fancy. > > This script use the commands as the samba wiki

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 08:14:58 -0600 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 2016-11-19 07:54, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 07:03:22 -0600 > > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > On 2016-11-18 13:19, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba wrote: > > >

On 2016-11-18 13:01, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: > Hi Bob, > > Am 18.11.2016 um 18:41 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba: > >> Louis, >> >> I ran your db check script against my newer DC's and it is failing. >> >> Searched the samba wiki and not finding resolution easily. > > If this is a script that is not provided by Samba,

On 2016-11-04 12:43, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 12:29:42 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 2016-11-04 12:07, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 11:49:16 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy <bob at donelsontrophy.net> wrote: > > On 2016-11-04 11:31, Rowland Penny via

On 2016-10-08 07:58, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sat, 08 Oct 2016 07:50:03 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I have built a second dtdc03 and joined to my first dtdc01. Thought >> all was well but, discovered that reverse dns is not correct on second >> dtdc03. >> >> root at dtdc03:~# host dtdc03

I have built a second dtdc03 and joined to my first dtdc01. Thought all was well but, discovered that reverse dns is not correct on second dtdc03. root at dtdc03:~# host dtdc03 dtdc03.dtshrm.dt has address 192.168.16.49 root at dtdc03:~# host 192.168.16.49 Host 49.16.168.192.in-addr.arpa. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) root at dtdc03:~# nslookup dtdc03 Server: 192.168.16.49 Address: 192.168.16.49#53

On 2016-11-04 10:55, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 08:04:44 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On wiki page >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#Reconfiguring_the_BIND9_DLZ_Back_End >> in the "Debugging the Bind Module" the section discusses the location >>

On 2016-11-04 11:31, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > <<<<< cut >>>>>>>> > >> root at dtdc03:~# samba-tool dns zonelist dtdc03 >> 3 zone(s) found >> >> pszZoneName : xxx.168.192.in-appr.arpa >> Flags : DNS_RPC_ZONE_DSINTEGRATED >> DNS_RPC_ZONE_UPDATE_SECURE >> ZoneType

On 2016-11-04 12:07, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 11:49:16 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy <bob at donelsontrophy.net> wrote: > > On 2016-11-04 11:31, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > <<<<< cut >>>>>>>> > > root at dtdc03:~# samba-tool dns zonelist dtdc03 > 3 zone(s) found > > pszZoneName

On wiki page https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#Reconfiguring_the_BIND9_DLZ_Back_End in the "Debugging the Bind Module" the section discusses the location for the log file. The /etc/named.log says "bash: bind: -g: cannot read: No such file or directory" . . . I am puzzled, what "file or directory" is being referenced? My "nslookup

On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 06:09:19 -0600 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 2016-11-21 04:01, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > > > Hi Bob, > > > > Sorry for the late responce, i was out for the weekend. > > > > I saw you got it fixed, good. ;-) > > > > Good to know its a bug. Thanks Rowland for pointing

On 2016-11-18 13:19, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba wrote: > On 2016-11-18 13:01, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: > > Hi Bob, > > Am 18.11.2016 um 18:41 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba: > > Louis, > > I ran your db check script against my newer DC's and it is failing. > > Searched the samba wiki and not finding resolution easily. > If

Hello Samba team ! On my network I have three Samba-4.1.17 domain controllers (Debian Jessie) : -> One PDC : pdc01 -> Two "slave" DC : sdc02, sdc03 I don't know why, but sometimes Samba receive the SIGTERM signal and restart even if I remove it from the logrotate configuration. On "pdc01" I see : ---------- pdc01 (log.samba) ---------- SIGTERM: killing children

I'm testing a samba4 server join AD (had 1 win2003 dc) as dc. Version: Samba4 DC: samba 4.1.1 with ubuntu (172.16.3.8) Win2003 DC: Win2003 SP2 (172.16.3.3) AD domain name: dotest.com The samba server had joined to AD as DC. When win2003 dc online, it seems works fine. When I test win2003 dc online, simulate the win2003 DC was failue, found the samba4 DC can't work fine along. The AD

Dear All, Recently I notice that sometime the AD DC will die sometime. Any one have see this issue before? And yesterday case lead me to believes that this error message was the issue... They are repetitive and thus I only show 2... [2015/07/29 00:00:04.620033, 0] ../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:681(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 for

New to linux and new to Samba so any direction in troubleshooting would be helpful. Here is what I have so far. Within a half an hour of a reboot of the server my cpu reaches high numbers and becomes slow to respond on all actions. With my limited understanding I have used vmstat to observe the system. I noticed is that the numbers of forks grows from 1-2k to 43k within 30 minutes after reboot. I