similar to: member server resolv.conf question

On 2016-11-14 08:39, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Is this on a windows 7 or 10 client or both? > Are you useing \\FQ.DN\share or \\hostname\share > Try the FQ.DN, as Microsoft advices. > > And where are the TLS parameters in the below config. > Did you set this up? > > Greetz, > > Louis > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van:

I have a member server running Ubuntu 16.10, Samba 4.4.5 that is serving files to W10 and W7 clients. Things appear fine and suddenly the server share disappears and the W clients "cannot see" the server. The client error message is: "The device or resource (member hostname) is nt setup to accept is not setup to accept connections on port "The file and print sharing

On 2016-12-04 09:11, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 04 Dec 2016 08:01:09 -0600 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I have two DC's running Samba 4.5.0 and the "dtdc03" log.samba is >> showing the following: >> >> root at dtdc03:~# tail -f /usr/local/samba/var/log.samba >> [2016/12/01

On 2016-12-04 10:25, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 04 Dec 2016 09:43:25 -0600 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 2016-12-04 09:11, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Sun, 04 Dec 2016 08:01:09 -0600 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I have two DC's running

On 2016-12-01 10:00, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 09:20:15 -0600 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> From: Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> >> To: SAMBA MailList <samba at lists.samba.org> >> Subject: [Samba] member server resolv.conf question >> Date: Thu,

I have two DC's running Samba 4.5.0 and the "dtdc03" log.samba is showing the following: root at dtdc03:~# tail -f /usr/local/samba/var/log.samba [2016/12/01 10:14:39.167794, 0] ../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_sock.c:245(continue_ip_open_socket) Failed to connect host 192.168.16.50 (aa03011a-94c2-4c52-bc60-6fd2f75d35e5._msdcs.dtshrm.dt) on port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED.

Oops, sent it to Louis directly. My bad. See conclusion below. -------- Original Message -------- SUBJECT: Re: [Samba] Member server losing smb connection [solved] DATE: 2016-11-14 10:22 FROM: Bob of Donelson Trophy <bob at donelsontrophy.net> TO: "L.P.H. van Belle" <belle at bazuin.nl> REPLY-TO: bob at donelsontrophy.net On 2016-11-14

Is this on a windows 7 or 10 client or both? Are you useing \\FQ.DN\share or \\hostname\share Try the FQ.DN, as Microsoft advices. And where are the TLS parameters in the below config. Did you set this up? Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Bob of Donelson > Trophy via samba > Verzonden: maandag

Hai, ? Just a tip for the people reading the list. ? if you see Failed DNS update - NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT? or messages : ?RPC unavailable if you connect from windows client to the samba AD DC server ? Read this. ? I have a "test' AD DC on a XEN server running and this DC does nothing. 1 pc ( win7) is joined, some dns recored are set, nothing special.. ? today i checked the logs, and

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 08:14:58 -0600 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 2016-11-19 07:54, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 07:03:22 -0600 > > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > On 2016-11-18 13:19, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba wrote: > > >

On 2016-11-21 04:01, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hi Bob, > > Sorry for the late responce, i was out for the weekend. > > I saw you got it fixed, good. ;-) > > Good to know its a bug. Thanks Rowland for pointing that out. > > ( added that in the script. ) > > @Marc, this is nothing fancy. > > This script use the commands as the samba wiki

On Sun, 04 Dec 2016 09:43:25 -0600 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 2016-12-04 09:11, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On Sun, 04 Dec 2016 08:01:09 -0600 > > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> I have two DC's running Samba 4.5.0 and the "dtdc03"

On 2016-10-08 07:58, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sat, 08 Oct 2016 07:50:03 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I have built a second dtdc03 and joined to my first dtdc01. Thought >> all was well but, discovered that reverse dns is not correct on second >> dtdc03. >> >> root at dtdc03:~# host dtdc03

I have built a second dtdc03 and joined to my first dtdc01. Thought all was well but, discovered that reverse dns is not correct on second dtdc03. root at dtdc03:~# host dtdc03 dtdc03.dtshrm.dt has address 192.168.16.49 root at dtdc03:~# host 192.168.16.49 Host 49.16.168.192.in-addr.arpa. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) root at dtdc03:~# nslookup dtdc03 Server: 192.168.16.49 Address: 192.168.16.49#53

I just transfered fsmo roles from one DC to my newer DC and all went well. Thank you Samba team!! Great documentation, BTW. My domain (basically) consists of one ADDC, one member server and two W10 clients and one W7 client. While setting up the newer DC had been running some nslookup on the DC's and decided to run nslookup on my member server and do not know if I have discovered and

At one point, I thought the same. Tried a "sleep 5" and still got some failures. (That was before I started counting the fails.) This is a P4 3.2Ghz with 1Gb RAM. Could it be that sluggish (at that moment) and need a "sleep 10" or "sleep 15" or more? It worked on my VM (of course it is running on a multi-core Xeon processor so maybe a sleep?) I'm going to try

On 2016-11-18 13:01, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: > Hi Bob, > > Am 18.11.2016 um 18:41 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba: > >> Louis, >> >> I ran your db check script against my newer DC's and it is failing. >> >> Searched the samba wiki and not finding resolution easily. > > If this is a script that is not provided by Samba,

No. What I did was change the first few to see what happens. And still the first 13 (this time, last time 17) failed. I am baffled why the first 11 to 17 fail (randomly) and the remainder receive "Successfully granted rights." --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On

Thanks Rowland but that idea did not work. I will simply grant access to those that failed manually. (Really wish I had kept the VM that the scripthad worked on so I could go back and see what happened but, too late, I have already deleted to save precious hard drive space.) If I have any issues, I'll be back. --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846

On 09/01/15 18:31, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > On 2015-01-09 11:40, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> On 09/01/15 17:26, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: >> On 2015-01-09 10:23, Rowland Penny wrote: On 09/01/15 15:47, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: On 2015-01-09 09:27, Rowland Penny wrote: On 09/01/15 15:00, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: On 2015-01-09 08:44, Rowland Penny