similar to: Everyone ACL problem

Yes, I have. But nothing change... Kevin Le 26/11/2016 à 12:08, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 11:44:50 +0100 > Kévin GUERINEAU via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello list, >> >> I have problems with my PDC Samba Servers and all file servers. >> All DC Server have a compiled Samba 4.4.5. File servers have Samba

I have upgraded Samba from a NT PDC to an AD DC about a week ago. Everything went pretty well until today. I've already configured about 25 GPO's (through RSAT on a Windows 10 machine) - but when I came to add more GPO's - it wouldn't let me with the above error message. My specs are: Samba 4.5.0 Slackware -current 64bit Kernel 4.4.20 The client machine is a Windows 10 Pro.

On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 11:44:50 +0100 Kévin GUERINEAU via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello list, > > I have problems with my PDC Samba Servers and all file servers. > All DC Server have a compiled Samba 4.4.5. File servers have Samba > Debian packages. > > In all shared folders, the ACL has the group "Everyone" and I can't > remove it.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I use Samba 4.3.3 and Rowland it dosn't metter if I build it by my self or install tehe SerNet-Packages ;-) Everytime I craete a new GPO or change something in an existing GPO, the test with "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" fails with the following Error: - ---------------- ERROR(<class

Hello, i configured group policy via RSAT in my samba 4.1.13 implementation the policy applies correctly to my windows 7 clients but not to my windows XP clients. when i run gpupdate /force in windows XP it replies that the policies are apply correctly .... when i run ./samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception -

Dear All, I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found that GPO are having issue Specifically when I'm adding new using they *never *got the gpupdate success fully. When I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck or samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset But don't seem to got it fix.. Any suggestion? Thank in advance. #samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck Processing section

to fix this, try the following remove the content in the sysvol folder (move it away) run samba-tool with sysvol reset copy the content back with now setfacl copy the acl recursive to the 'domain folder' in vol back. now on a windows open group policy editor klik on the gp objects. if needed , it say i needs some right fix. when this is done dont sysvol reset anymore. this is a

Hi, First of all thanks for you answer, it seems that this can help, now some change made to gpo are applied and we are not receiving error in event viewer, but seem that some change are not applied, why and where I can find some information, in samba log anv event viewer any error is reported Also I have tried # samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset After this tried # samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck

On 28/12/15 10:07, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Hai Stefan, > > If you look from within windows, are you sysvol rights ok? > If so, just ignore these message. > There think there is nothing wrong with your sysvol rights, old bug imo. > > Greetz, > > Louis > > > > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at

Hi all, I'm afraid I'm back to my old issue of GPO permissions. I have two ADDCs providing an AD Domain (internal.stmaryscollege.co.uk (short-name 'SMC')). Servers are called 'ad-01' and 'tainan'. ad-01 is 'Version 4.0.10' and tainan is 'Version 4.1.0rc4' (the latest version in the package repos of the respective OSs (arch and gentoo)) I have

On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 4:02 PM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > What do you mean by 'working domain' and 'non-working domain' ? > Do you have two domains ? Different sites, different companies, not related. The working one was also a classic upgrade but earlier on, pre 4.6.x. Just using it to compare. > I am also trying to understand why

On 21/07/16 22:18, Trenta sis wrote: > I'm not sure what are you deatiling, is a bug in progress taht can cause > this random problems with some gpos or this error can be ignored? > > 2016-07-21 20:37 GMT+02:00 Trenta sis <trenta.sis at gmail.com>: > >> Hi, >> >> First of all thanks for you answer, it seems that this can help, now some >> change

Hello everyone. I'm trying to fix sysvol rights, because i see errors in output of /usr/bin/samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory /var/lib/samba/sysvol/samdom.svmetal.cz/Policies/{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}

Can anyone explain what is happening when I run / usr / local / samba / bin / samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck it and an error? ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO file /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/tdsfs01.net/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/USER/Scripts/scripts.ini

Hi everyone. I ran into notorios gpo error on windows clients. When I go to my dc controller and run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck I get an error: ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/tsnr.mtt/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}

On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 3:31 PM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > OK, if you look at the end of the permissions, there is a '+' sign, this > shows that extended acls set, to see these: > > getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol The difference in acls is that the non-working domain includes: user:3000001:r-x user:3000002:rwx user:3000003:r-x

Hi all, We'er running a classicupgraded samba4 AD 4.1.6 sernet for a month or two now, and all is very well. :-) It has been classicupgraded using the same 4.1.6. Today I wanted to try GPO's and they are not applied. GPUpdate /force tells me: "Windows attempted to read the file blahblah\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful". Taken from the mailinglist, I

Hello Sébastien Le Ray, The PC reply the following... The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the user name. This could be caused by one or more of the following: a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain controller. b) Active Directory Replication Latency (an account created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller). The

> root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba --version > Version 4.5.8-Debian > root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset && echo "no error" > no error > root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck > ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory

So I ran a samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck, and the following error message came up: --------------------snip-------------------- ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory /var/lib/samba/sysvol/samdom.com/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/MACHINE/Scripts/Startup