similar to: Spec migrations?

Kevin Wright wrote: > library(nlme) > m2 <- gnls(conc ~ t1*(1-t2*exp(-k*time)), > data = df.Chloride, > start = list( > t1 = 35, > t2 = 0.91, > k = 0.22)) So my error was to use nls instead that gnls. Thanks a lot, Kevin. > summary(m2) > plot(m2) > lag.plot(resid(m2), do.lines=FALSE) >

I would like to perform partial mantel tests on only within group values, with "between group" values assigned to NA. This is possible in package ncf partial.mantel.test, however this sues a different permutation to that used in ecodist.ecodist will not accept data with NA values, returning a "matrix is not square error. is it possible to perform this test in ecodist? many thanks

Hi, I have a data-matrix: > PID sato hrs fim health 214 3 4.376430 6.582958 5 193 6 4.361825 3.138525 6 8441 6 4.205771 3.835886 7 7525 6 4.284489 3.245139 6 6806 7 4.168926 2.821833 7 5682 7 1.788707 1.212653 7 5225 6 1.651463 1.436980 7 4845 6 1.692710 1.267359 4 4552 5 1.686448 1.220539 6

Hi all, I've been working with a friend's model that is a spatial model consisting of 4 patches. She uses the code found below to add migration between the patches for the three species of concern. When I run a script incorporating this code, all four patches run independently without migration occuring. When I type m1[1,2] into the workspace to see if it will return a figure, it returns,

Hi all, I have a matrix simulating migration in a spatial model. I want to be able to define movement (the values of m1, m2 and m3) as only != 0 between adjacent patches and contingent on certain conditions as defined in the function. Here is the code: WET<-function(t) {everglades$precipitation[t]} #simply reads precipitation data from a csv, value is numeric AB<-function(WET,t)

Dear All, I am new for R and SEM. I try to fit the model with Y (ordinal outcome), X (4 categorical data), M1-M3 (continuous), and 2 covariates (Age&sex) as a diagram. library(polycor) model.ly <-specify.model() 1: x -> m1, gam11, NA 2: x -> m2, gam12, NA 3: x -> m3, gam13, NA 4: age -> m1, gam14, NA 5: age -> m2, gam15, NA 6: age -> m3, gam16, NA 7: sex -> m1,

first, apologies for so many posts yesterday and today. I am wrestling with nls() and nls2(). I have tried to whittle it down to a simple example that still has my problem, yet can be cut-and-pasted into R. here it is: library(nls2) options(digits=12); y= c(0.4334,0.3200,0.5848,0.6214,0.3890,0.5233,0.4753,0.2104,0.3240,0.2827,0.3847,0.5571,0.5432,0.1326,0.3481) x=

Hi I have a small ISDN PABX , (BRI) at home - Siemens Gigaset 4175 which has cordless DECT extensions. I have set up asterisk on FC3 with two HFC cards and I am using the latest bristuff. I am trying to use * between my ISDN line and my PABX. One card is in TE mode and can receive and make calls OK. I can make and receive external calls to a SIP phone. I cannot get the other card to talk to my

Thank you David. Using xtabs operation simplifies the code very much, many thanks ;) On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:44 AM, David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote: > > > On Jun 6, 2017, at 4:01 AM, Jim Lemon <drjimlemon at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Bogdan, > > Kinda messy, but: > > > > N <-

Hello, I have a lot of data and it has a lot of NaN values. I want to compress the data so I don't have memory issues later. Using the Matrix package, sparseMatrix function, and some fiddling around, I have successfully reduced the 'size' of my data (as measured by object.size()). However, NaN values are found all over in my data and zeros are important, but zeros are found very

Hello, My name is Ick Hoon Jin and I am Ph. D. student in Texas A & M Univ.. When I run the C embedded in R in the Linux system, I confront the following error after 6,000 iteration. By googling I found this error is from the problem in C. *** caught segfault *** address (nil), cause 'memory not mapped' My C code is following:

Dear Contributors I have a problem with the collection of data from the results of a test. I need to perform a comparative test over groups of data , recall the value of the pvalue and create a table. My problem is in the way to replicate the analysis over and over again over subsets of data according to a condition. I have this database, called y: gg t1 t2 d 40 1 1

Here's another approach: N <- data.frame(N=c("n1","n2","n3","n4")) M <- data.frame(M=c("m1","m2","m3","m4","m5")) C <- data.frame(n=c("n1","n2","n3"), m=c("m1","m1","m3"), I=c(100,300,400)) # Rebuild the factors using M and N C$m <-

Simple matrix indexing suffices without any fancier functionality. ## First convert M and N to character vectors -- which they should have been in the first place! M <- sort(as.character(M[,1])) N <- sort(as.character(N[,1])) ## This could be a one-liner, but I'll split it up for clarity. res <-matrix(NA, length(M),length(N),dimnames = list(M,N)) res[as.matrix(C[,2:1])] <-

I have a big database which more classes in class variable. I want to make each class to one dataset, for example: x1 x2 x3 x4 class a b a c c M1 c b b c c M4 c c a c c M2 c a c a a M2 c c a a a M1 c a b c a M3 c c a b c M3 c a c a b M2 c c a b a M1 How can I make, like: x1 x2 x3 x4 class a b a c c M1 c c a a a M1 c

A few days ago, I had asked this question. Consider this situation: > x1 <- runif(100); x2 <- runif(100); y <- 2 + 3*x1 - 4*x2 + rnorm(100) > m1 <- summary(lm(y ~ x1)) > m2 <- summary(lm(y ~ x2)) > m3 <- summary(lm(y ~ x1 + x2)) You have estimated 3 different "competing" models, and suppose you want to present the set of models in one table. xtable(m1) is

> On Jun 6, 2017, at 4:01 AM, Jim Lemon <drjimlemon at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Bogdan, > Kinda messy, but: > > N <- data.frame(N=c("n1","n2","n3","n4")) > M <- data.frame(M=c("m1","m2","m3","m4","m5")) > C <-

Hi, I am having an issue when creating a postscript file from RGL window. It seems to cut off some of the axis labels. Here is the code I am using. I created a 3D plot using RGL_0.71 with R 2.5 on Windows XP. z1<-c(5,4,1,4.5,2,3,2,1,1) z2<-c(6,8,7,7.5,5,3.5,4,1,1) z3<-c(3,2,4,7,3,4.5,6,2,3) x1<-seq(1,9) x2<-seq(1,9) x3<-seq(10,18) y1<-seq(8,0) y2<--1*y1

Dear R Helpers, I came across discrepancies in estimates for nested factors in linear models computed with brackets and also when a crossing factor is defined as a factor or as a dummy (0/1) vector. These are probably designed features that I do not understand. I wonder if someone would be so kind as to explain them to me. First, if I do not bracket the nested pair of factors A/C, then (1) I

Hi All I can specify whatever inits, it has no effect on the estimation. I am replicating a textbook example. The result is completely trash, having estimates of -58.7 (sd=59.3), where it should be closer to an ml estimate of 0.585 (SE=0.063). The two chains within one run are different, but with different inits for different runs, I get exactly the same chains, and I mean exactly. If I set