similar to: DC server own hostname must be part of ad dc domain?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "DC server own hostname must be part of ad dc domain?"

2016 Nov 18
0
DC server own hostname must be part of ad dc domain?
See inline comments: On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:49:28 +0400 Mike Lykov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi all. > > If I have AD domain dc.samges.ru, how to setup a hostname, hosts file > and resolv.conf file? DNS is samba internal type. > > Now I have settigs as here: > (ad41 is dc with fsmo roles, ip 172.16.214.141, ad51 is a second dc, > ip
2016 Nov 21
2
group policy update fails
Hai, Since your getting. finddcs: No matching server found > ERROR: Invalid IP address '3(NXDOMAIN)'! There is something wrong in the base of you setup. Check all DC's for ipnumbers (A) and PTR records. Dont forget to create the reverse zone yourself. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_Troubleshooting
2016 Nov 18
1
DC server own hostname must be part of ad dc domain?
18.11.2016 15:22, Rowland Penny via samba пишет: >> root at ad51:~# hostname -f >> ad51.samges.ru >> Must I have an $SERV.$ADDOMAIN hostname, like ad51.dc.samges.ru ? > Yes > >> If I change hostname now, what will happen in AD domain ? > > Your machine will not be found. But it can be found via DNS, why changing local (for this server) hostname affects this?
2016 Nov 21
0
group policy update fails
21.11.2016 12:32, L.P.H. van Belle via samba пишет: > Hai, > > Since your getting. > finddcs: No matching server found >> ERROR: Invalid IP address '3(NXDOMAIN)'! > There is something wrong in the base of you setup. yes, and it is a server own local hostname see "DC server own hostname must be part of ad dc domain?" thread your script relies on
2016 Nov 08
2
DNS "internal db error", samba 4.1.9
Hi all! I operate an AD domain on samba4, provisioned some years ago. At provision some dns zones created, linked to my domain. I name domain as subdomain of my internet domain: AD dc.samges.ru, internet zone samges.ru Forward zones: dc.samges.ru _msdcs.dc.samges.ru All worked normal, but then my coworker create forward zone samges.ru (using windows RSAT tools) It serves some names, I can
2017 Dec 15
4
DNS issue with clean install of samba 4.5.12-Debian
Hai Mike, I post it to the list so everybody can learn from it. > Why you use "hostname -i" ? man hostname wil tell.. But i'll try to explain it a bit. Read the Description, its also about how the hostnames are resolved within the systemfuntions. Like gethostname and gethostbyname > root at ad51:~# hostname -i > 127.0.0.1 > root at ad51:~# hostname -I >
2016 Nov 08
0
DNS "internal db error", samba 4.1.9
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 11:20:07 +0400 Mike Lykov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi all! > > I operate an AD domain on samba4, provisioned some years ago. At > provision some dns zones created, linked to my domain. > > I name domain as subdomain of my internet domain: > AD dc.samges.ru, internet zone samges.ru > > Forward zones: > dc.samges.ru
2016 Nov 18
2
group policy update fails
Ok just to verify. DC name= ad41.dc.samges.ru dnsdomain= dc.samges.ru Kerberos domain ?? Im guessing you kerberos to dnsdomain mapping is wrong. Can you post the /etc/hosts /etc/resolv.conf /etc/krb5.conf And, can you post this line u used for provisioning? Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Mike Lykov [mailto:combr at samges.ru] > Verzonden:
2012 Jan 22
4
Proxyndp issue
Tom In Shorewall6 4.4.27 the following proxyndp entry: 2001:4d48:ad51:24::f3 eth2 eth0 no no does not add the required route. The code produced in /var/lib/shorewall6/.restart is: qt $IP -6 route del 2001:4d48:ad51:24::f3/128 dev eth2 run_ip route add 2001:4d48:ad51:24::f3/128 dev eth2 Splitting the line into 2 separate lines: qt $IP -6 route del 2001:4d48:ad51:24::f3/128 dev eth2
2017 Jul 19
2
[ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements
[Adding gluster-users] On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:52 PM, yayo (j) <jaganz at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > We have an ovirt cluster hyperconverged with hosted engine on 3 full > replicated node . This cluster have 2 gluster volume: > > - data: volume for the Data (Master) Domain (For vm) > - engine: volume fro the hosted_storage Domain (for hosted engine) > >
2017 Mar 27
8
Provision new domain keeping users and passwords
Hello, I try to add a new dc to my domain, but the sysadmin installed the main dc left misconfigured dns zones that I can not remove. ¿Is it possible to provision the domain again using new samba as main dc Keeping users and passwords Of the previous dc? The current main dc runs samba 4.4. Best regards, Santiago. -- Santiago Londoño Mejía Analista de Infraestructura t. (574) 605 25
2017 Jul 20
3
[ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements
2017-07-20 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com>: > > Could you check if the self-heal daemon on all nodes is connected to the 3 > bricks? You will need to check the glustershd.log for that. > If it is not connected, try restarting the shd using `gluster volume start > engine force`, then launch the heal command like you did earlier and see if > heals
2016 Dec 19
2
[Announce] Samba 4.5.3, 4.4.8 and 4.3.13 Security Releases Available for Download
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:56:41 +0400 Mike Lykov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > 19.12.2016 13:18, Karolin Seeger via samba пишет: > > > 100000 - 33554431 and similar lines) was ignored formerly and leads > > to errors now. The typical error you see is NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID. > > For more details, please see the following bug: > > > >
2016 Nov 18
0
group policy update fails
18.11.2016 16:45, L.P.H. van Belle via samba пишет: > Ok just to verify. > > DC name= > ad41.dc.samges.ru > > dnsdomain= dc.samges.ru yes > Kerberos domain ?? /etc/krb5.conf [libdefaults] default_realm = DC.SAMGES.RU dns_lookup_realm = false dns_lookup_kdc = true > Im guessing you kerberos to dnsdomain mapping is wrong. > Can you
2017 Dec 11
4
DNS issue with clean install of samba 4.5.12-Debian
On 12/8/2017 2:54 PM, Taylor Hammerling via samba wrote: > Glad you guys replied, here is my output :D > > root at dc1:~# ./samba-setup-checkup.sh > Check hostnames : Ok > ./samba-setup-checkup.sh: line 89: [: too many arguments > Checking detected host ipnumbers from resolv.conf and default gateway > Ping gateway ip : 172.28.0.1 : Ok > ping nameserver1: 172.28.255.49 : Ok
2017 Dec 15
0
DNS issue with clean install of samba 4.5.12-Debian
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:58:03 +0100 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai Mike, > > I post it to the list so everybody can learn from it. > > > Why you use "hostname -i" ? > man hostname wil tell.. But i'll try to explain it a bit. > Read the Description, its also about how the hostnames are resolved >
2017 Dec 15
0
DNS issue with clean install of samba 4.5.12-Debian
See the following. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6761 Read 6.3 And https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1537 Snap: Note that all domains that contain hosts should have a "localhost" A record in them. Thats what i follow as close as possible. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny
2016 Nov 17
3
group policy update fails
We can login just fine but Group Policy Update is throwing an error gpupdate Updating Policy... User policy could not be updated successfully. The following errors were encount ered: The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not determine if the user a nd computer accounts are in the same forest. Ensure the user domain name matches the name of a trusted domain that resides in
2017 Jul 20
0
[ovirt-users] ovirt 4.1 hosted engine hyper converged on glusterfs 3.8.10 : "engine" storage domain alway complain about "unsynced" elements
On 07/20/2017 02:20 PM, yayo (j) wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for the answer and sorry for delay: > > 2017-07-19 16:55 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com > <mailto:ravishankar at redhat.com>>: > > 1. What does the glustershd.log say on all 3 nodes when you run > the command? Does it complain anything about these files? > > >
2016 Nov 14
0
are errors in LDAP replicate?
We have an AD domain (based on old Samba 4.1.9), and currently in LDAP database we have some errors, which samba-tool dbcheck cannot fix. for example: ----------------------- samba-tool dbcheck --fix (.... many similar errors ...) ERROR: parent object not found for DC=SAMG62\0ADEL:ccc70e60-4086-49b0-86f0-e5b4af86666d,CN=Deleted Objects,DC=Domai nDnsZones,DC=dc,DC=samges,DC=ru Move object