similar to: STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER for printer trying to connect to smb share

I understand from the wiki that I shouldn't have the domain controller also be the file server. Is it possible to to setup the domain controller in a chroot and have the file server run under regular root? Would it be better to setup a VM for the domain controller and have file server run on the main OS or vice-versa? Regards, John

Reply to Kiran Chandramohan: > You are welcome to participate, provide feedback and criticism to change the design as well as to contribute to the implementation. Thank you Kiran. > But the latest is what is there in the RFC in discourse. I have used this as reference for the response. > We did a study of a few constructs and clauses which was shared as mails to flang-dev and the

Hi, I have few questions / concerns regarding the design of OpenMP dialect in MLIR that is currently being implemented, mainly for the f18 compiler. Below, I summarize the current state of various efforts in clang / f18 / MLIR / LLVM regarding this. Feel free to add to the list in case I have missed something. 1. [May 2019] An OpenMPIRBuilder in LLVM was proposed for flang and clang frontends.

Please find the reply inline below On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 12:59 AM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 10:42 AM Vinay Madhusudan via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Reply to Kiran Chandramohan: >> >> > You are welcome to participate, provide feedback and criticism to >> change the

I have a samba version 3.024 server joined to a ADS as a "Workstation or server" acting as a file/print server. It is a Debian 4.0 amd64 up to date with stable. ftp works just fine so not network, must be samba config. vary slow file transfer when copying file from one computer but copy from two or more at the same time speed is 10 times faster. You will be copying a 600MG file with one

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 1:54 PM David Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: > Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> writes: > > > Of course by its nature, MLIR doesn't lend itself to concrete semantic > >> descriptions, though I would expect the affine dialect (and others) to > >> have documentation on par with the LLVM IR. > > > > >

Thanks for the reply! It sounds like LLVM IR is being considered for optimizations in OpenMP constructs. There seems to be plans regarding improvement of LLVM IR Framework for providing things required for OpenMP / flang(?) Are there any design considerations which contain pros and cons about using the MLIR vs LLVM IR for various OpenMP related optimizations/ transformations? The latest RFC [

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 1:40 PM David Greene via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > > But perhaps more importantly, as Hal states clearly, is the need for > > an official specification, similar to the one for LLVM IR, as well as > > a formal document with the expected semantics into

Hello, I was reading about secure Dialect negotiation to prevent man-in-middle to downgrade dialects & capabilities. _https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/openspecification/2012/06/28/smb3-secure-dialect-negotiation/_ I wanted to ask, is there any option to disable SMB2 to do dialect renegotiation as present in Windows8 clients, as they can control using RequireSecureNegotiate. -- Thanks Amit

I'm wondering if anyone else has any feedback on this or needs anymore info ? Mike -----Original Message----- From: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Tompkins, Michael via samba Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 9:19 AM To: Aurélien Aptel <aaptel at suse.com>; samba at lists.samba.org Cc: USA Xerox Samba <USA.Xerox.Samba at xerox.com>; Futrell, Earl

We get STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER failures when smbclient uses SMB2 but passes with NT1. We do get some success, but mostly failures. It appears to happen after it transfers the PDF file. These are the packets leading up to SMB2 failing after the transfer: No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info 266 2015-04-09 08:30:43.688568000

I am wondering if anyone has had a chance to look at bug 12518? This is the context of the message: Wireshark trace gives a STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER when running smbclient -c 'cd <dir>;ls' as a standalone program. This is a customer issue. We cannot recreate this issue so we're looking for why this may be happening. From the trace you'll see multiple sessions with

"Tompkins, Michael via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: > Wireshark trace gives a STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER when running > smbclient -c 'cd <dir>;ls' as a standalone program. This is a customer > issue. We cannot recreate this issue so we're looking for why this may > be happening. From the trace you'll see multiple sessions with >

"Tompkins, Michael via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: > I'm wondering if anyone else has any feedback on this or needs anymore info ? Can you provide the output of the failing command with full debug messages (-d10)? -- Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3 SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg,

This issue is reproducible for this customer and a couple of others. We execute the smbclient command the same way for each instance. The null user name is valid syntax sent from the smbclient. When we send the command " smbclient -c 'cd <dir>; ls' ", samba code executes starting with Negotiate Protocol Request, and onward. I'm guessing this could be a DFS issue, but

Hi, I am enhancing the Samba Server on our product (VxWorks on the box) to support Long Name. So I started implementing the dialect "LM1.2X002" (first dialects that support Long Name, the current dialect that we support is PC Network Program). I have implemented the Negotiation, Tree Connect AndX and Open AndX command. When I try access the shared drive of our product, after the

Am So., 12. Jan. 2020 um 20:07 Uhr schrieb Chris Lattner < clattner at nondot.org>: > The central idea is to use a modifiable loop tree -- similar to > LoopInfo -- as the primary representation. LLVM-IR is converted to a > loop tree, then optimized and finally LLVM-IR is generated again for > subtrees that are considered profitable. This is not a new concept, it > has already

Overall, I think it will be a good move. Maintenance wise, I'm expecting the existing community to move into LLVM (if not all in already), so I don't foresee any additional costs. Though, Hal's points are spot on... On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 18:47, Finkel, Hal J. via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > 3. As a specific example of the above, the current development

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the first stable release of the Samba 4.16 release series. Please read the release notes carefully before upgrading. NEW FEATURES/CHANGES ==================== New samba-dcerpcd binary to provide DCERPC in the member server setup --------------------------------------------------------------------- In order to make it much easier to break out

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the first stable release of the Samba 4.16 release series. Please read the release notes carefully before upgrading. NEW FEATURES/CHANGES ==================== New samba-dcerpcd binary to provide DCERPC in the member server setup --------------------------------------------------------------------- In order to make it much easier to break out