similar to: Right way to restore deleted objects (in samba 4.1 or newer with or without "ad recycle bin")

On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 20:07 +0400, Mike Lykov via samba wrote: > Hello all! > > I operate two-dc domain, based on samba 2:4.1.9+dfsg-1~bpo70+1 First, please upgrade to Samba 4.5.  This is particularly important if you wish to try and restore a deleted object. > Forest function level: (Windows) 2003 > Domain function level: (Windows) 2003 > Lowest function level of a DC:

01.11.2016 21:33, Andrew Bartlett пишет: >> I operate two-dc domain, based on samba 2:4.1.9+dfsg-1~bpo70+1 > > First, please upgrade to Samba 4.5. This is particularly important if > you wish to try and restore a deleted object. by the way, what way to upgrade are better: - stop samba, install new deb package, do some actions recommended in changelogs and start samba again (on

Hi all, System is Centos 7 and Samba is 4.2.1 sernet version. The database contains 120k users and 150k computers. It's size is 3.3GB on DC01 where the imports were performed and 2.8GB on the second DC. I was trying to index uid attribute and I have a strange behaviour. According to https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms679765%28v=vs.85%29.aspx it is the "searchFlags"

Hi everyone, in samba 4.5 changelog, it says that samba AD now supports tombstone reanimation. I've been used to ldbrename and ldbmodify to reanimate objects to keep objectSID, but if it is now officially supported, it would be better to use the proper way. Sysinternals tool adrestore [1] seems to be working properly (it does not restore most attributes, but this is expected since

Sadly the AD recycle bin isn't known to be reliably working in Samba. The main effect that was noticed is that for some reason when enabled, from memory, it caused the object to vanish almost instantly, rather than remain as a tombstone for a time (eg, it did the opposite). I've had investigating this properly on my wish-list for some time, but it is one of those annoying tasks that I

[As a separate thread, I am going to do post mortem of how I got here - and what not to do. I have a locked computer logged in as this user - need to unlock and access unsaved content.] I either need to resore the user or create a new user of the same name and sid. I am using Version 4.8.2 - commit e64d0d03351ce8fbc1f929fa86dcfd8d56183f35 . Names have been changed to protect the guilty. #

Thank you a lot Luca! I was able to change searchFlags using ldbedit command and I can't test right now the ldbmodify tool as samba seems to be indexing it's database (one thread eating 100% CPU for several minute, since I launched a ldbsearch on "uid" field). I'll try without my typo error (thank you again :) the ldbmodify command (to stop telling it doesn't work when

It had been working up to Samba 4.8 and with the recyclebin active you could restore every attributre, but since 4.9 it's not working anymore Am 02.05.23 um 23:57 schrieb Anderson Sampaio Mello via samba: > Hello everybody. > > When a user or group account is deleted, the user or group account is moved > to CN=Deleted Objects,DC=domain,DC=com > > I can find them with the

Hi, I've found in the list how to add new indexes to Samba4. I read the you have to modify the searchFlags attr in the schema. I've tried but fails. # ldapmodify -f uid.ldif SASL/GSSAPI authentication started SASL username: administrator at mydomain.local SASL SSF: 56 SASL data security layer installed. modifying entry "CN=uid,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=mydomain,DC=local"

Hai, I need to add some extra indexing on my AD DB, and im not sure if what the correct/best methode is. And is there any reason i should not do this, i did search on the wiki, but could not find the info i searched for. I know the following. Checked the current index. ( source info : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/LDB ) ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -s base -b @INDEXLIST

sorry it's not working any more. At least if you have more then one DC. I didn't get an answer to this problem so that's the reason why it will not be part of the new samba4 book :-( Am 15.10.2018 um 15:47 schrieb Oliver Heinz via samba: > Dear list, > > I am trying to restore an deleted user object with samba 4.9.1 (sernet > packages).  I am aware that the object will

Dear list, I am trying to restore an deleted user object with samba 4.9.1 (sernet packages).  I am aware that the object will lose some attributes without recycle bin enabled (enabling it is still not recommended, right?) I tried to rename the object in order to make the  necessary modifications afterward (as documented in Stefan Kania's Samba 4 book). But ldbrename already fails. root

Rowland, How exactly does this command work? recycle:repository = .recycle/%U Does the command create user folders with '.recycle' sub folders? On 3/17/2015 10:23 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 17/03/15 14:05, James wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Is this the preferred method for adding a recycle bin to a share? >> Share is located on a Samba 4.1.17 member

I make a recycle bin as follow: config-file = /etc/samba/recycle.conf vfs object = recycle recycle:subdir_mode = 0770 recycle:keeptree = Yes recycle:repository = Recycle Bin recycle:versions = Yes recycle:directory_mode = 0770 But testparm shows: Unknown parameter encounter: "config-file" Ignoring unknown parameter "config-file" What could be the problem and the solution?

Hello, I'm testing the "recycle: excludedir" option of Samba recycle bin but for some reason every deleted file is sent to the recycle bin, even those in excluded paths. Using samba/focal-updates,now 2:4.15.13+dfsg-0ubuntu0.20.04.4. This is the config for that share: --- [SHARE1] ??? path = /isp/SHARE1 ??? browseable = no ??? force create mode = 0660 ??? force directory

Hello, we are using the vfs module recycle with the following config: vfs objects = recycle recycle: repository = .Papierkorb recycle:directory_mode = 0777 recycle:subdir_mode = 0777 recycle: keeptree = Yes recycle: exclude = *.tmp, *.temp, *.log, *.ldb recycle: exclude_dir = tmp recycle:versions = Yes Problem is that everybody can see deleted documents in the recycle bin. But if I set

Using Samba 2.2.5 on FreeBSD 4.5. We have a file share used by several people working on common projects. The share is set up with force group = cad create mask = 0774 force create mode = 0774 directory mask = 0775 force directory mode = 0775 so that everyone can create/modify any file in the share. The new VFS recycle bin, however, sets the file

Hello, Is this the preferred method for adding a recycle bin to a share? Share is located on a Samba 4.1.17 member server. Thanks. /|[share]|/ path = /data/share <https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/manpages/smb.conf.5.html#PATH> vfs objects = recycle <https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/manpages/smb.conf.5.html#VFSOBJECTS> recycle:repository = .recycle

Hello Folks, can somebody give me detailed instructions for compiling the VFS-recycle bin-extension for samba 2.2.5? I tried it, already RTFM, but it didn't work. I don't know in which path I have to put the files from the /example directory to compile it correctly (newbie prob?!). Are there any further ./configure options I have to use? I'm running FreeBSD 4.5. You could even send me

Can not the configuration of the recycle bin be done with the active directory? I did tests, deleting but it only gives me the information of a user that had deleted a folder, what other parameters are necessary so that they are shown of all the users who deleted some file or folder? ---------------- [TI] path = /opt/sistemas read only = no # Recycle Bin vfs objects =