similar to: NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID

On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:27:37 -0400 Ryan Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I guess I should note that it seems like the high SIDs will resolve, > except for 300000. Below is an example. > > root at dc01:~# l /var/lib/samba/sysvol/medarts.lan/ > total 16 > drwxrws---+ 4 MEDARTS\reachfp 3000000 4096 Oct 17 17:45 Policies > drwxrws---+ 2 MEDARTS\reachfp

I guess I should note that it seems like the high SIDs will resolve, except for 300000. Below is an example. root at dc01:~# l /var/lib/samba/sysvol/medarts.lan/ total 16 drwxrws---+ 4 MEDARTS\reachfp 3000000 4096 Oct 17 17:45 Policies drwxrws---+ 2 MEDARTS\reachfp 3000000 4096 Oct 17 17:45 scripts root at dc01:~# l /var/lib/samba/sysvol/medarts.lan/Policies total 16 drwxrws---+ 5 MEDARTS\reachfp

Wait, now I'm confused. Idmap lines do not need to be set up on the DCs? Then how does windows figure's out the ids in the Unix Attributes tab? I thought you needed both rfc2307 and idmap on the DC and the members. Em 27/10/2016 05:39, Rowland Penny via samba escreveu: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:27:37 -0400 > Ryan Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >

On 03/07/15 15:18, Ryan Ashley wrote: > The only Unix client I can think of would be the Buffalo NAS. It runs > Samba3 and hosts various shares via SMB. DNS is handled by BIND9 on the > Samba4 DC. DNS does work and the domain name resolves to the IP address > of the server. DHCP is also handled on the DC. As for the GPO's, they're > in the correct place as far as I can tell.

On 03/07/15 15:58, Ryan Ashley wrote: > They left a PC on, so I got the info. The info pissed me off, but not > because of the issue. This time it worked flawlessly, but I got the > error from the event log from prior attempts. First, today's results. > > C:\Users\reachfp.KIGM>gpupdate > Updating Policy... > > User Policy update has completed successfully. >

17.07.2015, 17:30, "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>: > On 17/07/15 12:03, Andrej Surkov wrote: >>  I've got this on the backup DC >> >>  root at bdc:~# wbinfo --sid-to-gid S-1-5-21-1166961617-3197558402-3341820450-516 >>  3000000 > > OK, you have problems there, but not what you think. On my first DC > (note I don't have

Greetings, All! I've discovered a nasty mismatch in my recently upgraded domain. It seems that a number of builtin groups have mappings in idmap.ldb that overlap with posixAccount mappings in the sam.ldb. Namely, # file: var/lib/samba/sysvol/ads.example.com/scripts/ # owner: root # group: 544 user::rwx user:root:rwx group::rwx group:544:rwx group:30000:r-x group:30001:rwx

Hi, > OK, I take it that 3000009 points to CN=S-1-5-11 and it is just > CN=S-1-5-18 that is wrong by pointing at proxmox$ (which incidentally, > is one of your computers) > Try backing up idmap.ldb, then open idmap.ldb in ldbedit, find and > delete the stanza that holds CN=S-1-5-18, it will look like this: > > dn: CN=S-1-5-18 > cn: S-1-5-18 > objectClass: sidMap >

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > The trouble came from 'root' or groups '3000002' and '3000003'? > No and very very probably no & no ;-) > > How can i fix them? Thanks. > Fix what? The owner has to be 'root', and you can find out just who > '3000002' & '3000003' are by opening

Greetings, Rowland Penny! >>> Hi Louis, It works for me >>> This appears in log.smbd on my DC when I run the same command: >>> [2015/03/30 10:15:42.442881, 3] >>> ../source3/smbd/service.c:856(make_connection_snum) >>> dc01 (ipv6:::1:43602) connect to service IPC$ initially as user NT >>> AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON (uid=65534, gid=3000013)

I've got this on the backup DC root at bdc:~# wbinfo --sid-to-gid S-1-5-21-1166961617-3197558402-3341820450-516 3000000 while root at bdc:~# ldbedit -H /usr/local/samba/private/idmap.ldb objectsid=S-1-5-21-1166961617-3197558402-3341820450-516 shows correct xid 3000019 and on the primary DC I've got itk at dc:/$ wbinfo --sid-to-gid S-1-5-21-1166961617-3197558402-3341820450-516 3000019

On 04/11/2020 00:14, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: > Hmm, you say 'uidNumber' but I have xidNumber: > # editing 1 records > # record 1 > dn: CN=S-1-5-21-1638907138-195301586-368347949-3088 > cn: S-1-5-21-1638907138-195301586-368347949-3088 > objectClass: sidMap > objectSid: S-1-5-21-1638907138-195301586-368347949-3088 > type: ID_TYPE_BOTH > xidNumber: 1044 >

On 02/07/15 16:55, Ryan Ashley wrote: > Rowland, here is what I found in the ldb. > > # record 68 > dn: CN=S-1-5-32-544 > cn: S-1-5-32-544 > objectClass: sidMap > objectSid: S-1-5-32-544 > type: ID_TYPE_BOTH > xidNumber: 3000000 > distinguishedName: CN=S-1-5-32-544 > > # record 70 > dn: CN=S-1-5-32-549 > cn: S-1-5-32-549 > objectClass: sidMap >

Thank you very much for clarifying the ID mapping "magic";) > You do not need 'posixgroup', it is an auxiliary objectclass of group, you can add any of the rfc2307 attributes without it. Well, is there any option to remove it? Because "posixgroup" is on every group that was migrated from Samba 3. And I cannot edit this attribute in ADUC (delete button is grayed).

On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 2:38 PM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > So '5035' is a computer, but what is '3000011' ? > You can find out by running this on the DC: > ldbsearch -H /path/to/idmap.ldb '(&(objectClass=sidMap)(xidNumber=3000011))' =================================== # ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/idmap.ldb

Hello All, I've bitten the bullet and upgraded from sernet-samba-4.2 to 4.6.4-SerNet-RedHat-7.el7. Now my AD users don't show up in Linux, with the result that the [homes] share fails to connect. Other shares work fine, it's just the homes share. There doesn't appear to be any uidNumber mapping going on. I used to be able to use the unix command 'id' to show user info,

Greetings, Rowland Penny! >>>>> Hi Louis, It works for me >>>>> This appears in log.smbd on my DC when I run the same command: >>>>> [2015/03/30 10:15:42.442881, 3] >>>>> ../source3/smbd/service.c:856(make_connection_snum) >>>>> dc01 (ipv6:::1:43602) connect to service IPC$ initially as user NT >>>>>

:-| ls -lnd /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol drwxrwx---+ 3 0 3000000 4096 Jun 16 13:56 /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol Em 16-06-2017 13:38, Rowland Penny via samba escreveu: > On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:15:19 -0300 > "Carlos A. P. Cunha" <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: > >> OK, sorry, uncomment a line :-D >> >> Yes exist! >> >> ls -ld

On 01/12/14 17:46, steve wrote: > On 01/12/14 18:25, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 01/12/14 17:16, steve wrote: >>> On 01/12/14 18:11, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 01/12/14 17:09, steve wrote: >>>>> On 01/12/14 17:31, Greg Zartman wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Rowland Penny >>>>>> <rowlandpenny at

Rowland, Thank you for the quick response. I have just run net cache flush no change in problem. I have dumped the idmap.ldp using ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb > idmap.txt and did some sorting, that is how I found the duplicates. On 1/13/2017 11:09 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > samba-tool ntacl > >sysvolreset