similar to: idmap on two member file servers

You are correct. I discovered (a few minutes ago) that /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-wheezy-sernet.list had the duplicate line within it. Funny thing was, when I "comment out" the duplicate line, that "commented out" the single entry within the file. All other lines were already 'commented out'. So, after 'apt-get update' ran without error, I went back and

I am building a 64bit machine for a DC (CentOS 7) following the instructions on the Samba wiki. Installed Samba 4.3.1.tar.gz and when I try to provision the domain I get: ERROR(ldb): uncaught exception - operations error at ../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c:2241 Search the string and it is bug 11573 (assigned to Andrew.) I realize that he will work on it when he gets time

On 08/01/15 19:10, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > Part of the smb.conf > > [home] > path = /home/samba/DTDC01/users > comment = user folder 4 redirection > read only = no > > Hum-m-m? > > --- > > ------------------------- > > Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy > > 615.885.2846 (main) > www.donelsontrophy.com [1] > >

On my member server (Debian 7.8.0/Sernet Samba 4.2.2) when I run "apt-get update" I am receiving the following: Reading package lists... Done W: Duplicate sources.list entry https://download.sernet.de/packages/samba/4.2/debian/ wheezy/main amd64 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/download.sernet.de_packages_samba_4.2_debian_dists_wheezy_main_binary-amd64_Packages) W: You may want to run

At one point, I thought the same. Tried a "sleep 5" and still got some failures. (That was before I started counting the fails.) This is a P4 3.2Ghz with 1Gb RAM. Could it be that sluggish (at that moment) and need a "sleep 10" or "sleep 15" or more? It worked on my VM (of course it is running on a multi-core Xeon processor so maybe a sleep?) I'm going to try

On 08/01/15 18:37, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > First, I keep forgetting that I need to change the email address to > reply to the mailing list. Sorry about that, everyone. (Hard to follow a > thread that is fragmented like this one now is.) I am focusing to > intently on my problem. > > Rowland, changed to 0755 for the three directories you suggested and >

Rowland, I think you have confused my email with a different thread. Uhm . . what? --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-01-29 07:30, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/01/15 12:54, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > Rowland, I have tried your various alteration

No. What I did was change the first few to see what happens. And still the first 13 (this time, last time 17) failed. I am baffled why the first 11 to 17 fail (randomly) and the remainder receive "Successfully granted rights." --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On

Was busy, jumped back on here and answers Rowland's post (I think he might be into something there) and overlooked your post. No, I haven't but, I will, soon. --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [3] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-02-25 16:18, Miguel Medalha wrote: >> I've got a samba4

On 2016-12-01 10:00, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 09:20:15 -0600 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> From: Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> >> To: SAMBA MailList <samba at lists.samba.org> >> Subject: [Samba] member server resolv.conf question >> Date: Thu,

Rowland, The email here is a little crazy at the moment. Your reply to my email sent this morning (7 or 8 hours ago) just popped up. And this is since you I have emailed some more confusion. This thread is on HOLD UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE. Let's let the email world settle down. I am currently receiving emails from this morning and I am confused. And let get my head around all that we have

Thank you. This helps get me closer. One machine shows rsync 3.0.9 and the other shows rsync 3.1.0. Running "rsync --version" both show "ACL, xattr" are supported. Two questions, would the two different version cause it to fail? Second, does the order rsync "receives" the switches matter. Does "-A" and "-X" need to be near the beginning of

That was a cut/paste error. I've been thinking (danger, danger) when I test kerberos it returns the two DC's are available. Should it be including the member server also? Didn't I see the script setup kerberos on the member server? (Remember this was installed with the gen one scripts, not the newest scripts.) --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy

I expected to re-provision the domain. (That is easy, now.) Okay, so now the question becomes after the re-provision of the domain on the DC what needs to be changed on the MEMBER server. Obviously, the hostname needs to be corrected and check any needed changes within the smb.conf file. Thoughts? --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main)

Did, as su "apt-get install sernet-samba-ad" (after adding source to repositories.) (Have a test setup on CentOS 6.6 running but it is Samba 4.3.0 ** from git. Would prefer Samba version not so new as 4.3.0 so, want to change to Ubuntu.) --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an

W7 client domain member? yes. Logged in as domainAdministrator? yes. "SeDiskOperatorPrivilege" set? yes Read "/Setup_and_configure_file_shares_with_Windows_ACLs"? yes. --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [2] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-01-28 10:40, Marcel de Reuver wrote: >

I will add here that my server provisioned yesterday afternoon. However, I did not have time to do any testing. So, this morning testing and the first thing I discovered was "sernet-samba-ad" service was NOT running. I found a Debian Wheezy sernet samba posting (via Google) and within it read that users need to edit "/etc/default/sernet-samba" as follows: # ---- SETUP

Yes, it did install a bunch of packages from the sernet site. So far all the tests are failing. Seems that Sernet put samba under slightly different directories so I am struggling with testing. I was hoping there was some documentation on sernet site that I was having trouble finding, obviously not. Give me some time. It is just different again (from CentOS howto I had used in the past.) I

On 05/01/15 14:04, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > My shop is 10 minutes from my house. House and shop are connected by vpn > (between two IpFire firewalls.) I do a lot of configuring and testing > from home. Due to a Windows wake-on-lan issue (right now) I cannot wake > the lone DC W7 client from home. When I get to work this morning, W7 > client (thru ADUC) shows

Louis, I ran your db check script against my newer DC's and it is failing. Searched the samba wiki and not finding resolution easily. What to do? Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS, Samba 4.5.0 (from source). -- _______________________________ Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" Links: ------ [1]