similar to: Bind_DLZ and two AD DC

On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 20:29:43 +0100 Alex Crow via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 21/10/16 20:11, Means, Jeffrey D. wrote: > > > > I guess my real question is do I have to have all my DC's running > > either samba_internal or bind_dlz... ie do they have to all run the > > same DNS server software... > > > > > > Simple

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:51:49 +0100 Alex Crow via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >> That is really odd. I saw two mails from this person, with two To: > >> headers, one to me, one to samba at lists.samba.org. > >> > > As I pointed out, 'Means, Jeffrey D' has probably never registered > > to post on the Samba mailing list and his

On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 13:26:28 -0500 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > My first Active Directory setup had two DC's and shortly after getting > things going the second DC created a hardware failure issue and I just > continued life with one DC. > > Now, while upgrading I am returning to two DC's. > > In a normal Bind9

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:23:39 +0100 Alex Crow via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 22/10/16 08:44, Michael Howard via samba wrote: > > > >> In fact on the subject "Bind_DLZ and two AD DC" you replied just > >> before I did. > >> > > The confusion probably arises from the fact that two of your replies > > on this

On 21/10/2016 21:58, Alex Crow via samba wrote: >>> Simple answer - Yes, all your DCs need to run the same DNS >>> implementation. Mixing is not supported. You can convert your DCs at >>> any time but it's probably better to decide before deployment. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Alex >> Alex, I am a Bit perplexed here, you seem to

On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 18:02:19 +0100 Alex Crow via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi List, > > I have just reproduced this issue with Sernet Samba 4.4.5. I did a > migration from classic on a new VM, and this time created the next DC > on a new IP. As soon as I issued "samba-tool domain demote > --remove-other-dead-server=<original DC name>". I

Just check, yes all my pc's ( dhcp and static ) are owner of the DNS records. NTDOM\COMPUTERNAME$ is set on the record and every pc its own record. ! one thing, i do use Bind9_dlz with samba and not internal DNS. I forgot if i mentioned it before or not. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens lingpanda101

On 12/8/2016 5:16 AM, Alex Crow via samba wrote: > > > On 07/12/16 16:23, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: >> Just check, yes all my pc's ( dhcp and static ) are owner of the DNS >> records. >> >> NTDOM\COMPUTERNAME$ is set on the record and every pc its own record. >> >> ! one thing, i do use Bind9_dlz with samba and not internal DNS. >> I

On 21/10/16 19:26, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba wrote: > My first Active Directory setup had two DC's and shortly after getting > things going the second DC created a hardware failure issue and I just > continued life with one DC. > > Now, while upgrading I am returning to two DC's. > > In a normal Bind9 "master and slave" setup the master always

Am 25.02.2015 um 22:38 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy: > > > I had to go do something else and have returned. I discovered that I > hadn't gone back far enough. This complaint first appears here: > > ==========Enable bind gssapi and bind9_DLZ > =============================== > [....] Stopping domain name service...: bind9rndc: connect failed: > 127.0.0.1#953:

On wiki page https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#Reconfiguring_the_BIND9_DLZ_Back_End in the "Debugging the Bind Module" the section discusses the location for the log file. The /etc/named.log says "bash: bind: -g: cannot read: No such file or directory" . . . I am puzzled, what "file or directory" is being referenced? My "nslookup

You can try to bind the interfaces including localhost. That worked for me. Am 25. Februar 2015 21:20:05 MEZ, schrieb Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org>: >Hello Bob, > >Am 25.02.2015 um 19:09 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy: >> I ran your "1-setup-sernet-samba4-ADDC-wheezy.sh" script and noticed >> this (during install:) >> >> ==========SE

On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 21:52:43 +0100 Alex Crow via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I am fairly sure this is your problem, it should be able to find the > > KDC on its own DC. Have you checked /etc/krb5.conf, /etc/hosts > > and /etc/resolv.conf ? > > With the BIND server not running, and this krb5.conf: > > [libdefaults] >

On 25/02/15 21:38, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > I had to go do something else and have returned. I discovered that I > hadn't gone back far enough. This complaint first appears here: > > ==========Enable bind gssapi and bind9_DLZ > =============================== > [....] Stopping domain name service...: bind9rndc: connect failed: > 127.0.0.1#953:

Hi list, Very strange problem here on Samba 4.5.2 DCs. We have set up some GPOs and they seem to work fine, however we need to apply some Security Filtering to a couple of them. We can add groups and users until we reach 6 groups/users/computers in the list box in GPO management. As soon as we try to add a 7th entry, GPO Management throws an "Access Denied" error. Even odder is

Are you replacing or merging the policies? > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Alex Crow via > samba > Verzonden: maandag 19 december 2016 15:29 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] GPO Security Filtering "Access Denied" > > > > On 19/12/16 14:18, L.P.H. van Belle via

I upped 1.0.4 of the script.. I added checks if no DC's are found, error message and exits script, so no python errors anymore, if i did it right. ;-) on both DC's do the following. and whats the output of : cat /etc/hosts cat /etc/resolv.conf and kinit Administrator SETDNSDOMAIN=`hostname -d` SETHOSTNAME=`hostname -s` SERVER_IP_ADRESS=`hostname -i` echo "Test domainname:

Hi List, I am currently testing inter-forest trusts between a pair of AD domains. All DCs and member servers are using Sernet Samba 4.4.5. I have set up conditional forwarding in by Bind setup (I'm using BIND9_DLZ) and all machines can resolve each other. On the DCs, I can see users from the other side of the trust using wbinfo -u --domain=<other domain>. In addition if I set up ID

We actrually have the same problem. However, we are running a normal fileserver (also Sernet 4.4.5) no cluster in an NT-Style domain with Centos 5 (Samba 3.6.23) as the DC. IT works OK for some days then just stops. Any idea how to debug? Regards Christian --

Am 25.02.2015 um 23:39 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy: > No, I haven't but, I will while type that reply you could have done the command below netstat --numeric-hosts --numeric-ports --programs -u -t -l that's the first in case of connection troubles because until that confirms a service is listening the firewall is not part of the game > "Everyone deserves an award!!"