similar to: NS records for a new AD DC

Anyway NS records are used when DNS server speak to DNS server, not by clients. So AD would work just fine without them. NS are used when a client ask something the configured resolver can't resolve by himself and when the resolver is not configured to forward request to relevant DNS server. IE: client search for toto.org and its resolver does not know anything about that zone. Resolver will

Hi, all! There is no check of NS records in this document https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Verifying_and_Creating_a_DC_DNS_Record For example, with two DCs at myzone $ host -t NS myzone dc1 (or dc2, or myzone) must return two records: myzone name server dc1.myzone. myzone name server dc2.myzone. $ host -t NS _msdcs.myzone dc1 (or dc2, or myzone) must return two records: _msdcs.myzone name

I joined a Windows 10 Pro system to my (still experimental) domain. The windows system actually hosts DC2 as a VM, and another Windows (Server 2008 R2) at another location hosts DC1 also as a VM. The two locations are connected via a VPN, both systems run only when needed. The windows system does not directly use DC2 for DNS but instead talks to a DNS resolver that delegates the samba Domain to

Hi All, Is it correct that my RODC domain controller (DC2.ad.example.nl) has only one entry in the (internal) DNS on domain controller DC1? It seems to me that because of missing dns entries it is not used by clients in the ad domain I recently installed a second Domain Controller (DC2) along the smooth running first domain controller DC1. Samba version 4.8.5, Centos 7 Linux, further config

Hello Samba-ers, I tried to continue my Samba setup after a long pause doing other stuff. To recall, I want to run two Samba DCs for one domain as virtual machines on two Windows systems (I switched from VirtualBox to Hyper V, which helps to run them automatically at system startup, but I don´t think that really matters). Both DCs shall use themselves as DNS server as the VPN in between is

Thanks for the quick reply Rowland >Never ran an RODC (yet), but this all sounds like the problems that >used to occur when joining a second DC, try reading this: >https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Verifying_and_Creating_a_DC_DNS_Record I Checked this, both the A record and the objectGUID CNAME records exist for DC1 and DC2 on bth servers. >You could try restarting Samba, there is

Thank you Denis and Rowland - I didn't realise this was the script, makes sense now. I've run it (on dc2) and it gets as far as: need update: SRV _ldap._tcp.mysite._sites.ForestDnsZones.mydomain.org.uk dc2.mydomain.org.uk 389 [lots of updates needed] 10 DNS updates and 0 DNS deletes needed Successfully obtained Kerberos ticket to DNS/dc1.mydomain.org.uk as DC2$ and then it fails here:

I want to migrate old 2003 domain to Samba - join SAMBA 4.6(DC2) to win 2003 domain like DC, move sysvol, FSMO, demote old server(DC1), etc., etc. - https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory My problem are DNS Updates, I have kerberos working (added enctypes = rc4-hmac for compatibility), SAMBA join without errors, I have created DNS records, can

Hi all, I am experiencing strange behaviour regarding DNS resolution with my samba-driven AD. This is with Debian-packaged samba on raspberry Pi: # samba -V Version 4.19.5-Debian # uname -a Linux dc3.ad.mydomain.tld 6.1.0-rpi8-rpi-v8 #1 SMP PREEMPT Debian 1:6.1.73-1+rpt1 (2024-01-25) aarch64 GNU/Linux I would expect that every DNS server of the domain would respond with the same SOA record. But

Hello, My domain was provisioned using a Windows 2008R2 server as the first DC, and I then subsequently joined a Samba 4.4.2 DC running on Ubuntu 14.04.4 and using BIND 9.9.5 as the DNS backend. Everything seems to be working properly after I added an NC replica for the zones as per the troubleshooting page. All zones resolve and replicate properly, but I noticed that there are no NS records

Hello there, I have a problem with replication between two domain controllers, dc1 and dc2. Distribution: Debian 8.5 Samba-Distribution: sernet-samba 4.3.11-14 The replication on dc2 working fine without any failures. But the synchronization on dc1 gives the failure "WERR_BAD_NETPATH". Because the message "BAD_NETPATH" I checked the DNS-resolution:

Hi, I demoted my PDC (DC1) forcefully, because replication (among others) wasn't working anymore due to hard disk failure and I was afraid of spending a lot of time on nothing. With DC1 offline I seized the FSMO roles on DC2 (4.2.5), restarted Samba, and found errors in the samba log due to the missing DC1. I removed the two DNS entries created according to this site:

Hello Samba community! I have an legacy system with 7 Windows VM. In this system, the domain user is used to run services and interact with individual parts. I also have one PC on a domain from which I can run RSAT and can check the Zentyal webconfig. domain controller objectVersion: 47 #samba-tool domain level show Domain and forest function level for domain Forest function level: (Windows)

Hello, sorry to ask this many questions, but I want to know why things happen they way they do and if perhaps something is wrong. Our new, shiny domain created by classicupgrade consists of 4 (four) domain controllers. dc1 was the first, which was created by classicupgrade. Then I added dc2, dchks and dcirm using samba-tool domain join iww.lan DC -U "IWW\Administrator"

On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 09:45:18 +0100 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai, > > > I dont think one noticed this.. > > ldbsearch -H ldap://dc4 -UAdministrator > ldbsearch -H ldap://dc1 -U Administrator > > So whats the difference when you see this responce of the command: > Invalid option -U: unknown ... >

I have installed a secondary DC in my network, following the tutorial: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC#Kerberos I have ran the following command: samba-tool domain join mydomain.com.br DC -Uadministrator --realm = mydomain.com --dns-backend = BIND_INTERNAL It seems that everything is OK. I have ran the following commands in both DC and the result was the same: ldbsearch

Hello Samba Friends, I have a single DC (we'll call it, "DC1") that simply will not take my password when I run this command:? #samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://dc2 ldap://dc3 -Uadministrator? Or this command:? #samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://dc1 ldap://dc2 -Uadministrator? I basically get this:? > Password for [SAMDOM\administrator]:? > Password for [SAMDOM\administrator]:?

Hello, I'm trying to join a samba 4 DC to an already existing samba 4 DC, both with BIND9_DLZ. Samba is at version 4.4.5, bind is version 9.10.4-P1, all brand new. The existing DC runs fine, but the added DC refuses to update its local bind database: every attempt to update the local DNS results in "update failed: NOTAUTH". AD replication works perfectly. Both systems are set

Hello, i try https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Verifying_and_Creating_a_DC_DNS_Record ldapvi '(invocationId=*)' --cross-ncs objectguid I get objectGUID:: i55tljAenUWun3ISCvEXoQ== When I do "samba-tool dns add dc1 _msdcs.foo i55tljAenUWun3ISCvEXoQ== CNAME dc2.foo -Uadmin" ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (8, 'WERR_NOMEM') File

Hi Denis, thanks a lot! > you said that the zone is empty. It is not a problem per se but for some > time Bind-DLZ has been a bit more strict and ask for a NS record for > every zone. So you just have to create a NS field in your zone pointing > to one of your DC and you should be fine. Internal DNS does not have > this requirements. > > samba-tool dns mydc