similar to: Bug 6870 resurfaced in Samba 4.2.10

Hi, So I did some digging into the source code, and I think I've found the issue. Around line 120 of source3/libads/cldap.c: for (i=0; i<num_servers; i++) { NTSTATUS status; status = cldap_socket_init(state->cldap, NULL, /* local_addr */ state->servers[i], &state->cldap[i]); if (tevent_req_nterror(req, status)) { return tevent_req_post(req, ev);

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Rebecca Gellman via samba wrote: > > > Hi, > > So I did some digging into the source code, and I think I've found the > issue. Around line 120 of source3/libads/cldap.c: > > for (i=0; i<num_servers; i++) { > NTSTATUS status; > > status = cldap_socket_init(state->cldap, > NULL, /* local_addr */

Hai, Did you check if ifconfig still shows ipv6 adresses. ( even ::1 ) Can you check that. I have several with ipv6 on and severel only ipv4. As of 4.1.17+ i didnt see this happing here. Now on 4.4.5 I think you have forgotten something. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rebecca Gellman > via samba

Hi, I'm having problems in a second domain controller machine. Every time a restart samba, few time after a samba process starts using almost 100% cpu. It's a Centos 6.5 x86_64 with the following: sernet-samba-libsmbclient0-4.1.6-7.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-ad-4.1.6-7.el6.x86_64 sernet-build-key-1.1-4.noarch sernet-samba-libs-4.1.6-7.el6.x86_64 sernet-samba-client-4.1.6-7.el6.x86_64

Hi, Yes, I already thought about it. I have the sernet repo installed.. Is possible to yum update and jump from 4.1.6 to 4.1.14 directly, without problems or should I follow some kind of procedure to avoid future problems? Regards, Bruno Andrade. On 12/29/2014 01:46 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/12/14 12:02, Bruno Andrade wrote: >> Hi again, >> >> Sorry, I forgot to

Hi again, Sorry, I forgot to include the fd used... 13 -> /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=EXAMPLE,DC=COM.ldb 16 -> /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/metadata.tdb the others refers to /var/run/samba/winbindd/pipe Regards, Bruno Andrade. On 12/29/2014 11:56 AM, Bruno Andrade wrote: > Hi, > > Here is some output of "strace -ff -p" to the process using ~100% CPU >

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 03:40:08PM +0100, Nacho del Rey wrote: > Hi there > > In an Oracle RAC cluster using ACFS (as file-system) where we have a samba > server for sharing files to windows clients, we are suffering a strange > issue, from time to time, which it causes the Windows clients lock for a > while (10 min or a bit more) or even indefinitely when they are working >

Im having an issue with what I believe might be pinned down to a need for a proper samba configuration. The problem: sparse writes (not sure which, either write sparse files to a system that doesn't support them, or vice versa) The system: Zfs-on-linux, samba share Accessing system which is erroring: Win7x64_ult, freefilesync Error message NOTHING I have done to it is

Hi, When are client sessions closed? Let me explain what I'm trying to do... we're in a School district and we try to stop kids logging more than once. They way I did this before was to dump the active sessions from our previous Server2003 fileserver into a file once a minute and process it with a Perl script to check who was connected from where, rebooting machines remotely as

Hello, I'm using samba 4.7.3 to run an AD and I'm currently having issues with the MIT kerberos because it stops some time after starting (and apparently working correctly) without logging nothing out of the ordinary. My setup has 2 DC: one in an ubuntu 12.04 with version 4.1.9 (which we're migrating from) and the one I mentioned in CentOS 7 (which will be the only DC in the future).

Hi! I'm currently hunting a strange problem and looking for help! I have a samba3 fileserver (currently samba-3.0.20b, but problem can be reproduced with samba-3.0.7, but _not_ with samba2 like 2.2.8a), and I see performance problems when writing files with MS word 2002 SP3 from a NT4.0 (SP6a) workstation. Saving even the smallest file takes more than 10 seconds! Copying files with Windows

Hi everybody ! I am encountering performance problem on my bridgehead DC. I have 19 DC (Debian Stretch / Samba 4.6.7 from Tranquil.it repo) and they all synchronized on a main bridgehead DC. This performance problem first appears when the bridgehead DC was on Debian Jessie and kernel was updated with meltdown/spectre patch from Debian (3.16.51-3+deb8u1) I added "nopti" option to grub

Hello, I've come across a curious issue with Samba 3.6.10. When running 'emacs' version GNU Emacs 23.3.1 (i386-mingw-nt6.0.6002) of 2011-03-10 on 3249CTO on Windows Server 2008 SP2 x64 and issuing a file "revert" of one sort or another against a Samba-served file, the 'smbd' process leaks two or three handles. Eventually, when 16k handles are open, this causes

Hi! I need some help. We use samba4 as AD, and now when clients connect to server, samba process stuck at 100% cpu. samba Version: 4.3.4 Release: 13.el6 top: 3777 root 20 0 131m 46m 28m R 99.7 0.3 219:20.53 /usr/local/samba4//sbin/samba -D 24541 csertam 20 0 49260 11m 9048 S 25.1 0.1 0:01.56 smbd -D 7080 squid 20 0 926m 908m 6428 S 9.9 6.2 11:43.50

Did you install it from binary packages ? compiled from source ? Post your smb.conf here. ----- Original Message ----- From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 1:01:10 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] samba process use 100% cpu Anybody? 2017. 05. 02. 10:48 keltezéssel, Papp Bence via samba írta: > Hi!

Hi everyone; Have a Windows 2012 based workload that generates many (20K+ PPS) small reads (Wireshark tells me the individual packets are typically less than 200 bytes and are Read AndX Request) from eight or so hosts to a Samba server running on RHEL 6.5. Samba version is the latest Red Hat provided 3.6.9 version. Things are going quite a bit slower than expected (as compared to the same

Hello list, after upgrading dovecot from 1.0.15 to 1.2.2 (and carefully reading through the upgrading notes in the wiki), I got sieve, quota and fts up and running, but I'm now suffering some kind of performance problem with the STATUS command. Symptoms: Reading mail on the IMAP server itself with "mutt", no TLS/SSL, connected through loopback interface. Whenever I idle a bit and

We have a Linux file server for a set of computer science and engineering labs where each lab contains machines running Mac OS X, Ubuntu Linux, or some incarnation of Windows. At times the these machines become almost unusable and I think I have narrowed the problem to smbd processes soaking up all the CPU on the server. Running 'top' on the server reveals a dozen or so entries like

On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 22:21 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:58:33PM +0000, Jon Gerdes wrote: > > winbind has a concept of offline and online but I don't know what > > that > > is, nor how nss works with it. I've tried using smbcontrol to tell > > winbind it is offline or online but that does not seem to work. > > Restarting

Listing directories with many files (10000+) from a Windows client is nociceably slower when vfs_fruit is enabled on the samba server compared to the same setup without vfs_fruit. On my setup it's roughly 2.5 times slower. To me it looks like this is caused by the getxattr call which is only present with vfs_fruit activated and introduces an additional delay of ~ 0.00033 s per listed