similar to: samba4 with external OpenLDAP

Hi Philip, I forgot to mention that I was ignoring loop-independent dependences. If I don't I get an inconsistent, ordered, anti, loop-independent dependence and an inconsistent, ordered, flow, loop-carried dependence for example A. At the same time I get just a consistent, ordered, anti, loop-independent dependence for example B. Here's the .ll code for example A: *; Function Attrs:

Hi Philip, Thanks for checking! I'm running my own Foo pass that registers DependenceAnalysisWrapperPass as a prerequisite and then I run it like so: opt -load libfoo.so -foo example.bc This is LLVM 3.9. Cheers, - Stan On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Stan, > > in both cases I get a consistent anti result. Can you

> To answer your question I am testing on a pandaboard currently, which has >> an arm cortex-a9 processor, which I think is 64-bit. >> > > Cortex-A9 is still 32-bits, so you'll have all support you need. ;) > Ah, Okay, embarrassing... however it doesn't if I remove the -ffreestanding flag. I need to figure >> this out next. >> > > Can you at

Oh, I see, that makes a lot of sense. How do I build the pass pipeline? On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Feb 11, 2016, at 9:49 AM, Stanislav Manilov via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I am used to specifying dependence on other LLVM passes in the >

Hello Hal, I am not very familiar with the DSP capabilities of PowerPC, but I imagine there will be instructions for simple vector operations like vector addition, multiplication, etc. so for these I imagine the implementation would consist of just outputting the correct instruction. However, for NEON instructions like the reciprocal step (see

Hello, I am used to specifying dependence on other LLVM passes in the `getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &)` method of my pass. However, it doesn't seem that there is a header file that exposes the `mem2reg` pass - it is implemented in `Mem2Reg.cpp` as a wrapper. Is there an easy way to reuse this pass, or should I, in essence, duplicate `Mem2Reg.cpp` in my project? Cheers, - Stan

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Stanislav Manilov < stanislav.manilov at gmail.com> wrote: > As in "look at the source of clang" or as in "look at the -S -emit-llvm" > output? If you mean the former, then would that be easy for someone who > hasn't seen the clang source before? > Generally the latter - then potentially set some breakpoints & look at

The usual advice I provide people is "see what Clang does with an equivalent C construct" On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Stanislav Manilov < stanislav.manilov at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > There is another benefit to keeping the CppBackend: it's great for > learning how to use the IR and the C++ API in particular, as can be seen > from this SO Q&A: >

Hello Renato, It turned out I just didn't do the cross-compilation correctly, and Tim Northover already pointed me to a guide you have written on it ( http://clang.llvm.org/docs/CrossCompilation.html), so I will read that before continuing with my efforts. To answer your question I am testing on a pandaboard currently, which has an arm cortex-a9 processor, which I think is 64-bit. I am much

Hello llvm-dev, I'm running a pass that uses the result of llvm::DependenceAnalysisWrapperPass to compute the dependencies between all instructions of a loop. I have the following two examples of code I wish to analyse: example A: ``` void move_one(int *A, unsigned n) { for (unsigned i = 0; i < n-1; ++i) { A[i] = A[i + 1]; } } ``` and example B: ``` void move_one_alt(int *A,

Hello LLVM Devs, Thanks for helping me previously to cross-compile for ARM, I managed to get a working toolchain and am currently having fun compiling different toy problems and running them on a pandaboard. As part of my research I am trying to implement the ARM NEON Intrinsics in the PowerPC LLVM backend. I am still at the beginning of my efforts and am not yet familiar with either the ARM or

Hi, I think that someone has the solution for my problem! ;) After i did the upgrade process in a samba server, from debian squeeze to wheezy, the new samba version (3.6.6) is not working. Searching on web, there are many causes for this error, and i dont know what is mine. I can't connect with smbclient -L host -U ldapuser, that give me error "session setup failed:

Hello LLVM Devs, I am starting my PhD on Automatic Parallelization for DSP and want to play with some ARM NEON intrinsics for a start. I spent the last three days trying to compile a version of LLVM that would allow me to compile sources that contain these intrinsics, but with no success. In the process I found out that clang doesn't support NEON (as per

On 2 October 2013 12:17, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 2 October 2013 10:12, Steven Newbury <steve at snewbury.org.uk> wrote: > >> How does this make any sense? >> > > I have to agree with you that this doesn't make much sense, but there is a > case where you would want something like that: when the original source > uses NEON

Hello, I was trying to compile a simple program with the CppBackend like so: $ clang str_arg.c -emit-llvm -S $ llc -march=cpp str_arg.ll It produces a file `str_arg.cpp` as expected, however it doesn't seem that the resulting file is correct. For once, it includes `<llvm/Analysis/Verifier.h>` which seems to have been moved to `llvm/IR/Verifier.h` as far back as 2013. My question is

How does this make any sense? NEON intrinsics are there to support code generation targeting the ARM NEON SIMD unit on the ARM architecture. Power/PowerPC as it's own AltiVec/VSX SIMD units, which in turn has it's own intrinsics. If you want write code that explicitly targets CPU execution units it's necessarily tied to that specific CPU architecture. If you just want to test code

Hi Michal, I'm finally back on systemd integration with NUT. I've cc'ed Stanislav, since I've heard Suse is moving to systemd too. I've been investigation on your systemd integration in the tree, found a strange integration and understood why. I've fixed this with 2 commits: - r3528: only generate .in from configure, thus removing this annoying autoreconf msg - r3529:

Debian "testing" recently released a large version jump update to Samba (3.6.6 to 3.6.15). After the upgrade, winbind no longer works which, according to the information in the bug report, is due to authentication again a Windows 2000 DC. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9615 Are there any plans to patch this bug, or is winbind against a W2K DC forever a nonviable

I have a domain with Samba 3 acting as PDC, and using LDAP (passdb backend = ldapsam). I now wanted to add a second Samba 3 machine as a simple file server. I get errors with getdomainsid and getlocalsid, so there is obviously still something wrong with my config. The PDC runs Samba 3.5.6 on Debian Squeeze. Sid queries return: # net getdomainsid SID for local machine MY_PDC_HOST is:

Hello, I've got an AWS cloud and a local network. I'd like to setup an access from private EC2 instances to local network tinc server. There are two public EC2 instances with tinc server installed, other (private) EC2 nodes do not have tinc. http://imgur.com/tq84crc VPC subnet: 172.22/16 VPN subnet: 21.0.0/24 Source EC2 instance ip: 172.22.0.100 Tinc 1 ip: 172.22.0.101, 21.0.0.1 Tinc 2