similar to: Joining a Samba DC to Existing AD question

On 2016-10-10 08:33, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: > Hi Bob, > > Am 10.10.2016 um 13:18 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba: > >> I noticed the "Joining a Samba DC to an Existing Active Directory" wiki >> page was updated yesterday (October 9, 2016.) > > yes, I'm currently doing a lot of major updates, rewrites, enhancements, > and so on.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 08:14:58 -0600 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 2016-11-19 07:54, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 07:03:22 -0600 > > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > On 2016-11-18 13:19, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba wrote: > > >

On 05/01/15 14:04, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > My shop is 10 minutes from my house. House and shop are connected by vpn > (between two IpFire firewalls.) I do a lot of configuring and testing > from home. Due to a Windows wake-on-lan issue (right now) I cannot wake > the lone DC W7 client from home. When I get to work this morning, W7 > client (thru ADUC) shows

My first Active Directory setup had two DC's and shortly after getting things going the second DC created a hardware failure issue and I just continued life with one DC. Now, while upgrading I am returning to two DC's. In a normal Bind9 "master and slave" setup the master always "feeds" the slave. With Bind9_DLZ setup (recommended to be used with Samba4) there is

I did a fresh install of Debian with the desktop. I know from Ubuntu that the network is handled differently in the desktop and the server versions. So, I am assuming it is a similar situation with Debian. I could be wrong but . . . When kerberos installs via the script it (the script) suggests accepting the 'defaults on the next three screens.' The first screen included the correct

I am building a 64bit machine for a DC (CentOS 7) following the instructions on the Samba wiki. Installed Samba 4.3.1.tar.gz and when I try to provision the domain I get: ERROR(ldb): uncaught exception - operations error at ../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/password_hash.c:2241 Search the string and it is bug 11573 (assigned to Andrew.) I realize that he will work on it when he gets time

I was on the "Check and fix DNS entries on DC joins" page of the wiki and discovered: root at tdc01:~# host -t CNAME a486dd66-59c8-411b-9c04-98f03d998226._msdcs.test.bob a486dd66-59c8-411b-9c04-98f03d998226._msdcs.test.bob is an alias for tdc01.test.bob. a486dd66-59c8-411b-9c04-98f03d998226._msdcs.test.bob is an alias for TDC02.test.bob. I noticed that my first DC is all small case

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 07:03:22 -0600 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 2016-11-18 13:19, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba wrote: > > > On 2016-11-18 13:01, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: > > > > Hi Bob, > > > > Am 18.11.2016 um 18:41 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba: > > > > Louis, > >

I have updated from Samba 4.5.0 to 4.6.2 on my second DC and all appears good, so far. On the "https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba" [1] page of the documentation in section "Updating Multiple Samba Domain Controllers". The last line " . . . and always verify that the replication is working correctly." The replication discussed here. Is this the

On 2016-11-21 04:01, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hi Bob, > > Sorry for the late responce, i was out for the weekend. > > I saw you got it fixed, good. ;-) > > Good to know its a bug. Thanks Rowland for pointing that out. > > ( added that in the script. ) > > @Marc, this is nothing fancy. > > This script use the commands as the samba wiki

On 2016-11-18 13:01, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: > Hi Bob, > > Am 18.11.2016 um 18:41 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba: > >> Louis, >> >> I ran your db check script against my newer DC's and it is failing. >> >> Searched the samba wiki and not finding resolution easily. > > If this is a script that is not provided by Samba,

On 2016-11-14 08:39, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Is this on a windows 7 or 10 client or both? > Are you useing \\FQ.DN\share or \\hostname\share > Try the FQ.DN, as Microsoft advices. > > And where are the TLS parameters in the below config. > Did you set this up? > > Greetz, > > Louis > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van:

I went and got the newest (upped recently) script. No love. I removed the email address line to get more command line output. root at dc01:~# ./samba-check-db-repl.sh Running with with console output Running : /usr/bin/samba-tool ldapcmp --filter='whenChanged' ldap://dc01 ldap://dc02.dtsh***m.dt. Please wait.. this can take a while.. Failed to bind - LDAP error 49

I am seeing domain and forest levels for 2012R2 mentioned in the wiki pages. Has anyone in a production environment "raised" their domain and forest levels to 2012R2 yet? Am I correct that this would only apply to v4.5.0 or higher? -- _______________________________ Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy

On 2016-09-30 13:59, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:04:49 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 2016-09-30 07:27, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:01:05 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I have created a second DC and

On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:41:45 -0500 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 2016-09-30 14:16, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba wrote: > > > On 2016-09-30 13:59, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:04:49 -0500 > >> Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >

On my member server (Debian 7.8.0/Sernet Samba 4.2.2) when I run "apt-get update" I am receiving the following: Reading package lists... Done W: Duplicate sources.list entry https://download.sernet.de/packages/samba/4.2/debian/ wheezy/main amd64 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/download.sernet.de_packages_samba_4.2_debian_dists_wheezy_main_binary-amd64_Packages) W: You may want to run

Yesterday I was "tailing" a log file (nmbd, I think) and noticed complaints by my member server that there was another "domain master" at the ipaddress on my DC1. This morning Windows clients are being denied updates to "116.168.192.in-addr-arps/IN" (which I believe is the reverse zone.) I think I have an error in my smb.conf file for this server as I have had an

I have seen mentioned in other posts that when joining a DC with your linux client there is a way to do it and NOT use Powerbroker Open (new name for Likewise-Open). Where do I find this procedure? -- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" Links: ------ [1]

You are correct. I discovered (a few minutes ago) that /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-wheezy-sernet.list had the duplicate line within it. Funny thing was, when I "comment out" the duplicate line, that "commented out" the single entry within the file. All other lines were already 'commented out'. So, after 'apt-get update' ran without error, I went back and