similar to: Ctdb and mdb

ctdb 2.5.3 dual node file server with 4.1.9 serving AD domain Hi We have enabled the script at: /etc/cdb/events.d/50.samba but when we are the enabled node, it starts not only smbd but also nmbd. This doesn't make sense in an AD domain. I've tried disabling nmbd starting under openSUSE's systemd but ctdb overrides that, I've had a look at the script but can't decipher the bit

Ubuntu 14.04, ctdb 2.5.1 from the ubuntu package. samba 4.1.11 with cluster support from source. Error upon startup only. Restarting ctdb on that node clears the error. The other node with the same config is OK. Any ideas? Cheers, Steve smb.conf [global] workgroup = ALTEA realm = ALTEA.SITE security = ADS kerberos method = secrets and keytab netbios name = SMBCLUSTER disable netbios = Yes

Ubuntu 14.04, ctdb 2.5.3, samba 4.1.11. CTDB is working with IP takeover between the 2 nodes. The machine is joined to the domain. Any help with the following errors would be most gratefully received. 1. connect to socket error: ctdb status 2014/08/16 15:32:03.248034 [23255]: client/ctdb_client.c:267 Failed to connect client socket to daemon. Errno:Connection refused(111) common/cmdline.c:156

Ubuntu 14.04. 2 node ctdb in an 4.1.11 AD domain with 4.1.11 member servers on each node. winbindd is present but nss and pam are controlled by sssd. All OK, except that the event script which starts samba is not working. smb.conf [global] workgroup = ALTEA realm = ALTEA.SITE security = ADS kerberos method = secrets and keytab netbios name = SMBCLUSTER clustering = Yes ctdbd socket =

Hi there, I use Samba 4.9 since its releaseday and also had some troubles first due to the lack of informations in the wiki. Anyways... after some try & error i got it working and since i run the Cluster (non-production environment) had no errors except CTDBs monitoring of the Samba process did'nt work as i would expect it (RPC-Server was dead but CTDB did'nt complain and "ctdb

>> You don't have smbd/smbstatus installed from a package in /usr/ and the >> other left over in /usr/local/, or similar? In that case, they could >> be getting their configurations from different places... >> >> peace & happiness, >> martin > Hi Martin, > > No, nothing like that. Installing the Sernet packages obsoletes the > distro ones.

Hi all, I try to update two clustered samba file servers. Right now samba 4.7.0 with ctdb is running on both of them. To update samba I stopped ctdb on one of the servers, and compiled and installed samba 4.7.1 with: ./configure --with-cluster-support --with-shared-modules=idmap_tdb2,idmap_ad,vfs_glusterfs --with-systemd Trying to start ctdb on the updated server fails with "

I have been working on a CTDB cluster on and off for a while now. I had it working great for a while. THen I decide dthat I wanted to change the configuration of my replicated volumes. I changed my DRBD configuration to match my desired configuration. Now I can get the CTDB to work quite right. I am able to join the cluster to the domain without issues. I can also list my ad users and groups using

I suggest have a look in : https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12371 i think that wil help you. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Martin Schwenke > via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 21 oktober 2016 11:46 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] CTDB and locking issues in

Hello all, I've some CTDB issue which I'm not sure where to start... I follow this guide by steve which is nice. The different on what have is that I don't have drbd running... Also I've 4 x GE which is all Connected to a switch with different ip but same subnet This is suppose to load balance the traffic as under samba dns, they all have the same name. I'm only planing 3

Hi Alex, On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:28:38 +0100, Alex Crow via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > It appears that samba is still using local databases and not clustered > > databases. > > > > What does "ctdb getdbmap" list? Is locking.tdb a clustered database? > > Do you have "clustering = yes" in smb.conf on all the

> Interestingly I have a setup here for testing for rollout of S4 AD. > The file servers are in an AD domain and are running Sernet 4.4.5, so > one version older than production. I have tested the locking on these > and it works. The only difference I can find that in prod, > /etc/default/sernet-samba-ctdb contains these lines: > > CTDB_MANAGES_SAMBA=yes >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm trying to bring up a three node cluster using CTDB and SAMBA4 on a GlusterFS clustered file system. The filesystem itself seems to be working just fine, but CTDB doesn't seem happy. If I start a single node up: service ctdb start After about 10 seconds it becomes healthy, starts SAMBA and takes over all 3 IP addresses. However,

Dear all, after downloading ctdb with rsync -avz samba.org::ftp/unpacked/ctdb and compiling well. I installed on my Centos 5.3 sernet package samba 3.5.2. Also working well. But after setting up ctdb and samba und running it my two nodes freezing for a while And ctdb and samba are down again. On Both nodes My /etc/sysconfig/ctdb: CTDB_RECOVERY_LOCK="/cluster/recovery/recovery"

Hi all, I have two rhel 6.3 servers running sernet samba 4.1.4-7 with winbind connecting to AD. They're also running ctdb. For some very strange reason I can't get one specific AD group to show up in the output of "id username" or the gid of that group to show up in "wbinfo -r username" for the user on one of the servers but it shows up fine on the other. The strange

Am Do 01.02.2018 um 12:04 schrieb Martin Schwenke: > Hi Nicolas, > > On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 10:57:59 +0100, Nicolas Zuber via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I try to update two clustered samba file servers. Right now samba 4.7.0 >> with ctdb is running on both of them. To update samba I stopped ctdb on >> one of the servers, and compiled and

Hello. I am trying to clarify in my mind how winbind, pam and kerberos all work. I am hoping to get some knowledge to help debug and ensure our samba server keeps it's domain membership in the most robust way possible. Background: We are using a samba server to serve a filesystem to windows users. A group policy on the machines will automatically mount the filesystem. Samba and all the

Hi everybody, I just updated my ctdb node from Samba version 4.9.4-SerNet-Debian-11.stretch to Samba version 4.9.8-SerNet-Debian-13.stretch. After restarting the sernet-samba-ctdbd service the node doesn't come back and remains in state "UNHEALTHY". I can find that in the syslog: May 16 11:25:40 ctdb-lbn1 ctdb-eventd[13184]: 50.samba: samba not listening on TCP port 445 May 16

Dear list, We are about to upgrade to Samba 4.2.9 from sernet-samba 4.1.6 + CTDB 1.0.114.7 running on top of GPFS. My understanding is that as of 4.2, CTDB is now part of Samba. So does this mean we need to uninstall all of our sernet-samba and ctdb RPMs (we are on CentOS 6), then install the sernet-samba 4.2.9 rpms and reconfigure everything for CTDB? For those who have done this, how

Dear samba users: I am new on this list and know samba at a very basic level. I use openSUSE 42.2 Leap with its default samba 4.4.2 version. This is what I would like to achieve: I have a guest windows OS in virtualbox 5.1. Occasionally I have to print documents from this guest OS using my printer configured in openSUSE. I would like to use samba to share my printer between the linux host and