similar to: help with permissions

Does samba 3.0.23c not support the use of O_DIRECT? When I try to open an smbmount'd file using O_DIRECT, I get EINVAL. I am able to use O_DIRECT with no problems on a block device and nfs mounts, so I know the kernel supports it. samba: 3.0.23c kernel: 2.6.9-42.0.3.EL (32-bit) I am using the below code for my test. smb fails on open(2). #include <fcntl.h> #include

In a mailbox that has ACL restrictions on both DELETE and EXPUNGE (i.e. no 'e' or 't' rights), I see the following: 3 UID STORE 3173 (UNCHANGEDSINCE 353) +FLAGS \deleted 3 OK Store completed. (UID 3173 is not flagged \deleted) [...] 6 UID EXPUNGE 1:* 6 OK Expunge completed. (At least 1 UID is flagged \deleted in mailbox) Shouldn't these commands be returning

I need to mount a share I don't have direct access to only to one subdirectory. I have no problems mounting other shares on the same windows server with the same permissions. I can mount the volume through gnome "Connect to Server...", but I need it on the filesystem. What is working: smbmount //server1/share1 /mnt -o -fstype=cifs -noperm,credentials=/etc/auto.smb.server1 What is

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:42:20 -0800 Peter Carlson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 1/29/24 13:08, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:51:37 -0800 > > Peter Carlson via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > >> Just did a quick test, the big T comes after setting permissions in > >>

Hello, I have been doing a lot of research on this subject and I'm not finding a clear answer. My company currently makes a video capture and transcoding application that runs on a Linux server. The video application mounts shares from a second Linux storage server for various users at the same time. In other words, we have: A Linux Storage Server with many accounts (for example,

All, If the post "Samba 3.6 -> 4.1 change that prevent sharing / - mount error(13)" makes it to the list, I apologize, but it has been over a day and I have no indication that the post ever made it to the list. The issue is that in versions prior to 4.x, I was able to create a root share in samba, but now, something prevents it from being mounted. The relevant smb.conf is:

Hallo, I've just tried kernel 3.4.6, self compiled, with the ".config" from kernel 3.3.7. Samba version 3.5.14 (slackware) When I run a script with (among many other lines) the command mount.cifs //$share/$src /path/to/$target \ -o noperm,sec=ntlmv2,$Loginparms (which runs without any problem under kernel 3.3.7) then I get an error message (some cifs problem), and the

This patch exposes a generic interface which can be expanded in the future to implement USB for PVUSB, qemu, and stubdoms. It can also be extended to include other types of USB other than host USB (for example, tablets, mice, or keyboards). For each device removed or added, one of two protocols is available: * PVUSB * qemu (DEVICEMODEL) The caller can additionally specify "AUTO", in

Hello all, I have 2 identical Dell r510 servers with 10gig card, running centos 6 with samba-3.5.4-68.el6_0.2.x86_64. I setup 16G ramdisk samba share on both and ran cp from local ramdisk to samba ramdisk mount. If I cp 12 1-gig files, I get combined 100MB/s transfer rate. Single file cp maxes out at about 15MB/s. Ftp transfer give me over 300MB/s. Running with 9000 MTU. Most smb.conf is

I need a second pair of eyes here, please. I have a CentOS 6.6 server (let's call it 'S1") that has a Samba share on it that is currently working. We can mount that drive on our Windows work stations and transfer/delete from it just fine. It's setup as a "guest" config so no user specific passwords or any other restrictions like that. I'm trying to setup another

openSUSE v13.1 linux 3.11.10-11-desktop x86_64 samba 4.1.6 I recently upgraded an openSUSE server from v12.3 to v13.1. In the older version there was no problem about mounting a remote volume offered by an ancient OS/2 system. Now there is. Trying to mount it by command line: root:/home/sma-user3x> mount /t2 Retrying with upper case share name mount error(6): No such device or address

All, I've run samba in standalone mode since the 2.0.7 days and have been though a few breakages due to version updates along the way. It seems we have hit one again in the 4.4 to 4.5 update. Specifically, the update was samba-4.4.5 => samba-4.5.0 There were no changes made to smb.conf, but the following attempted mount failed using: mount.cifs //phoinix/samba /mnt/phx -o

Hi. I just got a new Windows 7 Home Edition computer and am unable to mount its shares on my Linux system. I'm running Fedora 11, samba 3.4.7 I have no trouble mounting shares from XP systems on the network using the mount command below. I can access the Windows 7 share with no problems using smbclient on Linux. The Windows 7 share is accessible from the XP systems. Here is the mount

I am trying to mount and access a Windows share, from one of our Active Directory servers to one of our RedHat Enterprise 4 Linux hosts. I have used Samba in the past to do the opposite, which worked very well. I was successful in mounting the share, using the following: mount -t smbfs -o username=<myid>,password=<mypassword> //<AD Server>/<Share> /mnt/app1

This patch series adds support for preservation of the VM generation ID buffer address in xenstore across save/restore and migrate, and also code to increment the value in all cases except for migration. Patch 1 modifies the guest ro and rw node creation to an open coding style and cleans up some extraneous node creation. Patch 2 modifies creation of the hvmloader key in xenstore and adds

Greetings all, I have a VERY basic fileserver in my network, that works well for my needs, and have run into a problem that I can't solve. I am sure that the more eperienced users here will be able to help me in less than 5 minutes, so please, if you have some time. My smb.conf [global] workgroup = msheimnetz server string = Samba Server Version %v netbios name =

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 09:03:41AM -0800, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > > Check out the latest cifsfs code. I think Steve > and Aurelian and Ronnie added an ioctl for this. > > I'm here at Vault in Boston with Steve, I'll ask > him :-). Steve says there are two utilities in Linux, getcifsacl and setcifsacl that use a custom ioctl inside the Linux cifsfs kernel

Hi, We have a sendmail/dovecot/squirrelmail installation that was working ok except for deleted files showing in the list with a [d] beside it. In trying to fix that issue, I apparently made a new error appear in the left navigation area: ERROR: Could not complete request. Query: CREATE "mail/Sent" Reason Given: [NOPERM] Permission denied There are no errors in dovecot, but from what

Hi all, My server machine is running samba version 4.4.4 on Linux with 'smb encryption = mandatory' option. My client is a Ubuntu 16.10 Linux machine. I am looking for a way to mount the encrypted samba share on the Linux client machine. I noticed that mount.cifs does not support encryption but smbclient does with an -e flag, however it seems to only be usable in a ftp-like interface.

Hello, I sent the following message to the Debian folks. They don't think that the Debian packaging could be responsible for the issue described there. > Well, I'm not completely convinced that we will have very useful input > for you. I don't really see any reason for this to be caused by the > Debian packaging. To check this, why not compile samba from sources,