similar to: turned on log level = 10 . . . no logs

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "turned on log level = 10 . . . no logs"

2016 Sep 30
2
turned on log level = 10 . . . no logs
On 2016-09-30 07:27, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:01:05 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I have created a second DC and joined it to my first DC. Seemed to go >> well, then not. Now experiencing dns issues. My syslog on first DC >> shows "Failed to connect host 192.168.xx.49 >>
2016 Sep 30
2
turned on log level = 10 . . . no logs
On 2016-09-30 13:59, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:04:49 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 2016-09-30 07:27, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:01:05 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I have created a second DC and
2016 Sep 30
2
turned on log level = 10 . . . no logs
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:41:45 -0500 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 2016-09-30 14:16, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba wrote: > > > On 2016-09-30 13:59, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:04:49 -0500 > >> Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >
2016 Nov 21
2
db check fails
On 2016-11-21 04:01, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hi Bob, > > Sorry for the late responce, i was out for the weekend. > > I saw you got it fixed, good. ;-) > > Good to know its a bug. Thanks Rowland for pointing that out. > > ( added that in the script. ) > > @Marc, this is nothing fancy. > > This script use the commands as the samba wiki
2016 Nov 19
5
db check fails
On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 08:14:58 -0600 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 2016-11-19 07:54, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 07:03:22 -0600 > > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > On 2016-11-18 13:19, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba wrote: > > >
2016 Oct 02
1
turned on log level = 10 . . . no logs
On 2016-09-30 15:43, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba wrote: > On 2016-09-30 15:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > >> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:41:45 -0500 >> Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >> On 2016-09-30 14:16, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba wrote: >> >> On 2016-09-30 13:59, Rowland Penny via samba
2016 Dec 04
2
port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED
On 2016-12-04 09:11, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 04 Dec 2016 08:01:09 -0600 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I have two DC's running Samba 4.5.0 and the "dtdc03" log.samba is >> showing the following: >> >> root at dtdc03:~# tail -f /usr/local/samba/var/log.samba >> [2016/12/01
2016 Dec 04
2
port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED
I have two DC's running Samba 4.5.0 and the "dtdc03" log.samba is showing the following: root at dtdc03:~# tail -f /usr/local/samba/var/log.samba [2016/12/01 10:14:39.167794, 0] ../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_sock.c:245(continue_ip_open_socket) Failed to connect host 192.168.16.50 (aa03011a-94c2-4c52-bc60-6fd2f75d35e5._msdcs.dtshrm.dt) on port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED.
2016 Dec 04
1
port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED
On 2016-12-04 10:25, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 04 Dec 2016 09:43:25 -0600 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 2016-12-04 09:11, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Sun, 04 Dec 2016 08:01:09 -0600 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I have two DC's running
2016 Sep 30
0
turned on log level = 10 . . . no logs
On 2016-09-30 14:16, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba wrote: > On 2016-09-30 13:59, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > >> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:04:49 -0500 >> Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >> On 2016-09-30 07:27, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:01:05 -0500 >> Bob of Donelson
2016 Dec 13
3
Bind version requirements
I read on the wiki page "BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End" that the bind version supported by the Samba version 4.5.2 is Bind 9.11? Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS repo offers Bind9.10.3 and Debian Jessie is Bind9.9.5. Currently running Samba 4.5.0 (from source) on Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS. Does this suggestion mean I am limited to Samba version 4.5.1 until Ubuntu upgrades the bind9 version? I have been
2016 Sep 30
0
turned on log level = 10 . . . no logs
On 2016-09-30 15:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:41:45 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 2016-09-30 14:16, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba wrote: > > On 2016-09-30 13:59, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:04:49 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba
2015 Feb 27
3
NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED, again!!!
Thanks Rowland but that idea did not work. I will simply grant access to those that failed manually. (Really wish I had kept the VM that the scripthad worked on so I could go back and see what happened but, too late, I have already deleted to save precious hard drive space.) If I have any issues, I'll be back. --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846
2015 Feb 27
2
NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED, again!!!
At one point, I thought the same. Tried a "sleep 5" and still got some failures. (That was before I started counting the fails.) This is a P4 3.2Ghz with 1Gb RAM. Could it be that sluggish (at that moment) and need a "sleep 10" or "sleep 15" or more? It worked on my VM (of course it is running on a multi-core Xeon processor so maybe a sleep?) I'm going to try
2015 Feb 27
2
NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED, again!!!
No. What I did was change the first few to see what happens. And still the first 13 (this time, last time 17) failed. I am baffled why the first 11 to 17 fail (randomly) and the remainder receive "Successfully granted rights." --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On
2016 Sep 30
0
turned on log level = 10 . . . no logs
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:04:49 -0500 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 2016-09-30 07:27, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:01:05 -0500 > > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> I have created a second DC and joined it to my first DC. Seemed to >
2015 Feb 27
2
NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED, again!!!
Thanks Rowland. Being the novice that I am, I thought the line would 'pickup' my DOMAIN and replace the ${SAMBA_NT_DOMAIN}. So, I just tried the line correctly and it asked for my Administrator password and subsequently granted access. At least I know I can go and correct manually, if I need too. My /etc/resolv.conf is: root at dt01:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf search dts***m.dt
2016 Sep 30
0
turned on log level = 10 . . . no logs
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:01:05 -0500 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I have created a second DC and joined it to my first DC. Seemed to go > well, then not. Now experiencing dns issues. My syslog on first DC > shows "Failed to connect host 192.168.xx.49 > (22******c8._msdcs.dtshrm.dt) on port 135 - > NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED."
2015 Feb 27
2
NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED, again!!!
I thought I was over this the other day when I got it to work properly on my VM. Now, on an actual PC I am getting: ==========Test kerberos =============================== Lets test some things Testing : kerberos Password for Administrator at DTSHRM.DT: Warning: Your password will expire in 41 days on Fri Apr 10 08:43:58 2015 Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_0 Default principal:
2016 Nov 18
2
db check fails
On 2016-11-18 13:01, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: > Hi Bob, > > Am 18.11.2016 um 18:41 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba: > >> Louis, >> >> I ran your db check script against my newer DC's and it is failing. >> >> Searched the samba wiki and not finding resolution easily. > > If this is a script that is not provided by Samba,