similar to: win 10 client on linux pdc, join domain ok, logon script fails to run

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "win 10 client on linux pdc, join domain ok, logon script fails to run"

2016 Sep 30
2
win 10 client on linux pdc, join domain ok, logon script fails to run
Hi, On windoze 10, I can only access "//hostname", i.e. "//DEV2" (net bios name) How do I tell it to access samba as "//DEV2.COMPO" (latter is domain?) I have looked at entries in lmhosts.sam - is this correct? DNS is not on linux box, google 8.8.8.8 through my router. Also, \\dev2\netlogon is accessible but \\dev2\sysvol is not. should I copy the smb.conf
2016 Oct 04
1
win 10 client on linux pdc, join domain ok, logon script fails to run
Hi, Just in case someone looks at this thread, I've fix my samba win10 issue with PDC. Here's what I did: To over come perhaps a DNS issue where complete name of server including top level domain name could not access box as \\hostname.tld\<share> I change the hostname to match netbios name. #cat dev2 > /etc/hostname #reboot edited hosts file to make sure old name was
2016 Sep 30
2
win 10 client on linux pdc, join domain ok, logon script fails to run
Thanks for your response. OK I get the AD DC part about sysvol and the fact I'm running a pdc. Can I confirm what you mean as domain? so if i get: #hostname dev2.test should my smb.conf have workgroup = test it does not match at present. regards -- View this message in context:
2016 Sep 30
0
win 10 client on linux pdc, join domain ok, logon script fails to run
> using virtual box and windows 7 IE 10 test ovp, I can join same pdc and > the > netlogon scripts run so it's something to do with samba and windows 10. Your totaly correct. ( and that can happen also with win7 ) Call you script like \\host.domain.tld\netlogon\... Dont use \\IP\... Or \\Hostname Best is you read :
2016 Oct 03
2
pdc win10 change password not working?
Hi, I have a PDC setup (kind of). smb.conf has: unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/smbpasswd %u passwd chat = *New*password* %u\n *Re*ype*new*password* %u\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* Logging ok but changing passwords in windows does not effect samba/linux account. Turned logging on to 10 but nothing obvious comes up when I ctrl-alt-del,
2005 Apr 04
1
FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-05:02.sendfile
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-05:02.sendfile Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: sendfile kernel memory disclosure Category: core Module: sys_kern Announced:
2017 May 30
2
Different primary group between 4.5.x and 4.6.x
Additionally if I authenticate to user using wbinfo -a it seems to works correctly: root at root:~$ id DEV2+guest uid=2000501(DEV2+guest) gid=2000513(DEV2+domain users) groups=2000513(DEV2+domain users),2000501(DEV2+guest),2000514(DEV2+domain guests) root at root:~$ wbinfo -a DEV2+guest Enter DEV2+guest's password: plaintext password authentication succeeded Enter DEV2+guest's password:
2017 May 31
1
Different primary group between 4.5.x and 4.6.x
On Wed, 31 May 2017 11:36:56 +0200 aluno3--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > root at host:~# su DEV2+dev2user1000 > > DEV2+dev2user1000 at host:/$ whoami > DEV2+dev2user1000 > > DEV2+dev2user1000 at host:/$ echo "testpermissions" >> /testfile > > DEV2+dev2user1000 at host:/$ cat /testfile > testpermissions > >
2017 May 26
2
Different primary group between 4.5.x and 4.6.x
I have upgraded Samba in my environment from 4.5.10 to 4.6.3 and experienced issue with primary group for domain guest user: With Samba 4.5.10 primary group for DEV2+guest was "DEV2+domain guests": root at root:~# id DEV2+guest uid=66037(DEV2+guest) gid=66050(DEV2+domain guests) groups=66050(DEV2+domain guests) With Samba 4.6.3 primary group for DEV2+guest is "DEV2+domain
2017 May 29
2
Different primary group between 4.5.x and 4.6.x
On 29.05.2017 12:03, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 29 May 2017 11:33:21 +0200 > aluno3--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> My configuration for idmap backend is: >> >> idmap config dev2 : range = 65536-19999999 >> idmap config dev2 : backend = rid >> idmap config * : range = 20000000-39999999 >> idmap config * : backend
2017 May 29
2
Different primary group between 4.5.x and 4.6.x
On 26.05.2017 17:03, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 26 May 2017 15:50:04 +0200 > aluno3--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> Is there possibility to not set "Unix >> Attributes" and have the same behavior as in 4.5? > > I do not know, you may have found a bug > > If I run 'id guest' on a Samba 4.6.x DC, I
2010 Oct 19
4
rename zpool
Hi, I have two questions: 1) Is there any way of renaming zpool without export/import ?? 2) If I took hardware snapshot of devices under a zpool ( where the snapshot device will be exact copy including metadata i.e zpool and associated file systems) is there any way to rename zpool name of snapshotted devices ?? without losing data part? Thanks & Regards, sridhar. -- This message posted
2007 Apr 10
15
Poor man''s backup by attaching/detaching mirror drives on a _striped_ pool?
Hi, one quick&dirty way of backing up a pool that is a mirror of two devices is to zpool attach a third one, wait for the resilvering to finish, then zpool detach it again. The third device then can be used as a poor man''s simple backup. Has anybody tried it yet with a striped mirror? What if the pool is composed out of two mirrors? Can I attach devices to both mirrors, let them
2004 Aug 13
1
Shaping weirdness
I''ve been following the HOWTO, and reading mailing list discussions about throttling bandwidth, and have had some success, but I just want to tie off some loose ends. Essentially what I am wanting to do is to keep our bandwidth usage below 1megabit, because if we go over we get charged for that traffic. I''ve used some of the examples from the HOWTO to limit our bandwidth, but I
2008 Nov 12
4
Courier->dovecot migration script
HI All, We have the latest Dovecot 1.1.6 running and I need to migrate some POP3 users over from Courier to Dovecot and would need to convert the courierpop3dsizelist to maintain the UIDs. I just need to confirm that the script (http://www.dovecot.org/tools/courier-dovecot-migrate.pl) only works for Dovecot v1.0 and not for v1.1? As the dovecout-uidlist file that is created (by the script) is not
2017 May 26
2
Different primary group between 4.5.x and 4.6.x
On 26.05.2017 15:31, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 26 May 2017 14:36:45 +0200 > aluno3--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I have upgraded Samba in my environment from 4.5.10 to 4.6.3 and >> experienced issue with primary group for domain guest user: >> >> With Samba 4.5.10 primary group for DEV2+guest was "DEV2+domain
2007 Nov 15
1
Problem with rsync recent file logic ?
Hello, I have 2 servers I'm synchronizing using rsync, I have a situation where I : 1. rsync from rnd-dev2 to rnd-dev1 2. change the rsynched file on rnd-dev1 3. rsync from rnd-dev2 to rnd-dev1 again 4. File gets overridden on rnd-dev1 over though it has newer change time then file on rnd-dev2. here is the bug(?) reproduction: [root@rnd-dev1 test_rsync]# rsync --version rsync version
2014 May 18
2
OpenArena artifacts since version bump to 1.1.1
Hello! I'm using NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M. And beginning with this commit: commit 142c21b8d493318551932eee2e9d98ff14b473da Author: Christoph Bumiller <e0425955 at student.tuwien.ac.at> Date: Wed Mar 27 22:25:52 2013 +0100 drm/nouveau/drm: bump the driver version to 1.1.1 to report new features till the latest kernel 3.15-rc5 OpenArena game looks like this:
2013 Feb 01
2
Nested loop and output help
Hello Everyone, My name is Thomas and I have been using R for one week. I recently found your site and have been able to search the archives of posts. This has given me some great information that has allowed me to craft an initial design to an inquiry I would like to make into the breakdown of McNemar's test. I have read an intro to R manual and the posting guides and hope I am not violating
2017 May 29
2
Different primary group between 4.5.x and 4.6.x
On 29.05.2017 10:42, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 29 May 2017 08:40:07 +0200 > aluno3--- via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >>> Have you given 'Guest' a uidNumber and/or gidNumber attribute ? >> >> If I run "id guest" I also have "no such user". I need to pass also >> domain realm: >> >>