similar to: Recreating dns.keytab - dns-<user> issue

Thanks Rowland, You saved me from a world of pain, I've now got named back up and running and also accessible via windows DNS GUI. the SOA record still says ns=dc03.. which is strange and the only place dc03 exists in the ouput of samba-tool dns query localhost mydomain.com @ ALL Is this something I can fix in the windows DNS GUI or do I need to do something with like FSMO ? Which btw

Ok I'll try that in the morning and will get back with the resilt. On 30 September 2016 at 21:22, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 20:24:45 +0100 > "Maton, Brett" <matonb at ltresources.co.uk> wrote: > > > Thanks for the suggestion Rowland, I had already tried that though > > and both secondary

Hi Rowland thanks for your response. I'm running samba 4.5.0rc1 on CentOS 7.2 I've dumped the DNS records, and it doesn't appear to have any SRV or NS records. Also the SOA record is pointing at the wrong server dc03 instead of dc01. I'm pretty sure it can be fixed, but I don't know how or what to do On 27 September 2016 at 07:59, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at

Thanks for the suggestion Rowland, I had already tried that though and both secondary DC's resolve.... host -t CNAME fbce444a-8707-4c69-8066-d75aacfb07f0._msdcs.mydomain.com. fbce444a-8707-4c69-8066-d75aacfb07f0._msdcs.mydomain.com is an alias for dc02.mydomain.com. host -t CNAME 04225dbe-d69c-4ea5-8930-eb8746790180._msdcs.mydomain.com.

I'm having a bit of trouble joining / starting an additional DC. OS: CentOS 7,2 Samba: 4.5.0 I've run through the steps on the wiki page: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Join_an_additional_Samba_DC_to_an_existing_Active_Directory I did have to manually add the DNS entries. When I start samba I see the following errors in /var/log/messages:

I was wondering how to configure the puppet clients to only listen, not to periodically pull configs down from the puppetmaster. I''d rather push the configs out from the puppetmaster with puppetrun... At a guess I need to set runinterval to 0 in /etc/puppet/puppet.conf? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post

how do i get the value of a javascipt confirm() function? a(:href=>R(DeleteUser, @user.id), :onclick => "javascript:confirm(''You sure about this?'')"){label} any tips? thanks! -- |^^^^^^^^^^^^\ .|| |NALDEVNGELSTA.___||''""|""\___, | ________________ l | |__|__|_|) (@!)!(@)"""""**|(@) (@)****|(@)

Now I'm developing a embedded device program.I want to provide SSH for the users. I also want to limit users to browse and execute only my commamds . Such as export/ls/find/cat/ fdisk/cd/rm/top/su etc., are forbidded[especially 'export ']. It looks like: root at fedora8 /#ssh 192.168.0.6 then: CLI> CLI>allcmds adduser deleteuser sessionlist sessionkill

Hello I'm having some dificulties joining my Samba 3.0alpha (and 2.2.7a) machine to my NT4 domain. Let me tell you what I'm attempting to accomplish. I want to setup the Samba system to authenticate to my NT domain so that I can use NTLM Proxy authentication with SQUID. Through reading the docs, I'm under the impression that in order to allow thre SQUID/Samba setup to auth on

Hi, I need some help again. :-) I have "Too much recursion error" prototype.js line 1288, I heve this error when I try to use Effect.dropout (script.aculo.us) if I remove table ID, there is no error, and the effect works fine (remove the tr from table) But I need this ID assign to this table, as table ID is used by other effect (Builder.node) Please help .... Thanks YUAN Here is

Hi Rowland, Hi looks like the "-c" option is optional. My problem is not really the kerberos cache file, but the "principal" linked to the user kerbuser. The principal is HTTP/webserver.MYDOMAIN.LOCAL at MYDOMAIN.LOCAL I would like to use kinit and give this principal as parameter. something like : > kinit -k -t /root/my.keytab HTTP/webserver.MYDOMAIN.LOCAL at

On 18/07/19 12:33, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > I would clone the DC you want keep, move the clone away from the > domain (easiest way, unplug the ethernet) then remove the old dead DC > from this and ensure it works. If you want to use Bind9 and don't have > the 'dns-*' user, then run samba-upgradedns as I said earlier. > > Once you are sure just what to do,

I think I'm missing some SRV records... Calling nsupdate for SRV _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._ sites.ForestDnsZones.mydomain.com dc03.mydomain.com 389 (add) Outgoing update query: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: UPDATE, status: NOERROR, id: 0 ;; flags:; ZONE: 0, PREREQ: 0, UPDATE: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; UPDATE SECTION:

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 08:53:24 +0100 "Maton, Brett" <matonb at ltresources.co.uk> wrote: > Hi Rowland thanks for your response. > > I'm running samba 4.5.0rc1 on CentOS 7.2 > > I've dumped the DNS records, and it doesn't appear to have any SRV or > NS records. > > Also the SOA record is pointing at the wrong server dc03 instead of > dc01.

On 18/07/19 11:42, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > Well, 'dns-dc2' is the user for Bind9 on dc2, so you shouldn't try to > create it yourself. > > Easiest way will be to remove all mention of the dead DC, then use > 'samba_upgradedns' to upgrade to the internal dns server, then run it > again to upgrade to Bind9 again, this will create the required user

Hi, I removed a couple of dead DC's from my domain using this command: samba-tool domain demote --remove-other-dead-server=<dc name> I then restarted named on the remaining server, but it failed to start with the following errors in messages: named[30255]: samba_dlz: configured writeable zone 'x.x.x.in-addr.arpa' named[30255]: samba_dlz: configured writeable zone

Hello, I'll try to be as brief as possible. I'm testing samba 4.8.3 on centos 7.5. Fresh installation joined to existing AD domain that was ran with samba 4.7.6. I did add 2 DC's with 4.8.3, then removed all 4.7.6 DC's. Everything seemed to work fine, except for adding DNS entries on one of the machines. Samba by itself was unable to add them throwing error in log that dnsupdate

Can you try to upgrade to any 4.8 version then to 4.9.4? might work, atleast my guess this will have a better chance get passed this bug. Greetz, Louis > Op 31 dec. 2018 om 18:35 heeft Král Gergely via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: > > 2018-12-31 17:29 id??pontban Rowland Penny via samba ezt írta: > >>> >> >> OK,

On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 20:09:44 +0100 Král Gergely via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > 2018-12-31 20:50 időpontban L.P.H. van Belle via samba ezt írta: > > Can you try to upgrade to any 4.8 version then to 4.9.4? > > might work, atleast my guess this will have a better chance get > > passed this bug. > > > > I can confirm that an upgrade to 4.7.3 to

hi all, we need to access a debian 3 /samba 3 beta 2 share from w2k-clients and xp-clients. my "normal" workstation is working under w2k, if i try to connect the share it works fine, no matter if i use my own workstation or a workstation running win xp. if someone who has a xp-machine as normal workstation tries to connect, the connetion to the samba-share is refused, no matter, if he