similar to: named ( bind 9.9.4 ) fails to start

Hi Rowland thanks for your response. I'm running samba 4.5.0rc1 on CentOS 7.2 I've dumped the DNS records, and it doesn't appear to have any SRV or NS records. Also the SOA record is pointing at the wrong server dc03 instead of dc01. I'm pretty sure it can be fixed, but I don't know how or what to do On 27 September 2016 at 07:59, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at

Thanks Rowland, You saved me from a world of pain, I've now got named back up and running and also accessible via windows DNS GUI. the SOA record still says ns=dc03.. which is strange and the only place dc03 exists in the ouput of samba-tool dns query localhost mydomain.com @ ALL Is this something I can fix in the windows DNS GUI or do I need to do something with like FSMO ? Which btw

Ok I'll try that in the morning and will get back with the resilt. On 30 September 2016 at 21:22, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 20:24:45 +0100 > "Maton, Brett" <matonb at ltresources.co.uk> wrote: > > > Thanks for the suggestion Rowland, I had already tried that though > > and both secondary

Thanks for the suggestion Rowland, I had already tried that though and both secondary DC's resolve.... host -t CNAME fbce444a-8707-4c69-8066-d75aacfb07f0._msdcs.mydomain.com. fbce444a-8707-4c69-8066-d75aacfb07f0._msdcs.mydomain.com is an alias for dc02.mydomain.com. host -t CNAME 04225dbe-d69c-4ea5-8930-eb8746790180._msdcs.mydomain.com.

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 08:53:24 +0100 "Maton, Brett" <matonb at ltresources.co.uk> wrote: > Hi Rowland thanks for your response. > > I'm running samba 4.5.0rc1 on CentOS 7.2 > > I've dumped the DNS records, and it doesn't appear to have any SRV or > NS records. > > Also the SOA record is pointing at the wrong server dc03 instead of > dc01.

Samba - General mailing list wrote > On Wed, 17 May 2017 04:26:16 -0700 (PDT) > artyom via samba &lt; > samba at .samba > &gt; wrote: > >> I use official manual from wiki.samba.org for install samba 4.6.3 >> (from source) with bind_dlz on bind 9.9.10 (from source too). My OS >> is Debian Jessie x64 8.8 netinst. I use >>

Hello, I have two samba 4.2.7-SerNet-Debian-8.wheezy AD servers. since few days now I have some winbind errorsthat block the server... It seems that they appears more and more frequently... ( about one time per day ) I have about 200 clients pc with windows 10, seven and XP. Last month I've migrated about 30 pc from seven to 10. Is there a relationship? In the following logs, you can see

I'm having a bit of trouble joining / starting an additional DC. OS: CentOS 7,2 Samba: 4.5.0 I've run through the steps on the wiki page: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Join_an_additional_Samba_DC_to_an_existing_Active_Directory I did have to manually add the DNS entries. When I start samba I see the following errors in /var/log/messages:

hai, ? I just noticed, after my pc woke up my A record disapearred. of my 64bit windows. ? ? Mar? 5 15:43:13 rtd-dc1 named[3717]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone INTERNAL.DOMAIN.TLD Mar? 5 15:43:13 rtd-dc1 named[3717]: client 10.249.250.64#49271: update 'INTERNAL.DOMAIN.TLD/IN' denied Mar? 5 15:43:13 rtd-dc1 named[3717]: samba_dlz: cancelling transaction on zone

Samba 4.1.16, Centos 6.6 x86-64, BIND_DLZ 9.9. I have three AD DC's that were functioning normally. However, today I restarted BIND on one node, and it failed to start with this message in the log (names changed): May 10 07:02:49 benford named[6767]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen May 10 07:02:49 benford named[6767]: samba_dlz: started for DN DC=samdom,DC=example,DC=com May

Another mistake : The louis's script ddns-kerberos-check.sh was not running in hourly.cron directory ( i make a chmod 770 to resolve that ) to recall here what I did: - I cloned the Windows 2000 server AD servers on a private network and I migrated to samba4 - Meanwhile, users have continued to use the Windows 2000 AD servers on the production network - I replaced the production servers

Second question: Take a look at the logs Apr 21 11:23:58 cd1 named[2224]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone 58.168.192.in-addr.arpa Apr 21 11:23:58 cd1 named[2224]: client 192.168.58.10#22874: update '58.168.192.in-addr.arpa/IN' denied Apr 21 11:23:58 cd1 named[2224]: samba_dlz: cancelling transaction on zone 58.168.192.in-addr.arpa Apr 21 11:23:58 cd1 dhcpd: Unable to add reverse

Hello All, I have 2 samba4 AD server with dhpd and dynamic DNS. I have well understand that for now it's not possible to have 2 DHCP server running in the same time. So I would have at a time only one dhcp server running. If the first server got a problem I want to manually start the isc-dhcp service in the second to rescue the system. But It's not working as I expected... If I switch

Hi everyone. I have a Linux nsupdate client sending dns update requests via sssd. Just gone from 4.1.2 to 4.1.3. I've done this: http://linuxcostablanca.blogspot.com.es/2013/09/samba4-bind9dlz-stale-dns-records-with.html After which the forward zone update is working fine: 2014-01-10T12:32:35.376142+01:00 hh16 named[4963]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone hh3.site

Hai,   Seeing : > Jan 23 14:55:40 samba01 named[3279]: samba_dlz: configured writeable > zone '168.192.in-addr.arpa' > Jan 23 14:55:40 samba01 named[3279]: zone local.laurenz.ws/NONE: has no > NS records > Jan 23 14:55:40 samba01 named[3279]: samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone > 'local.laurenz.ws'   Normaly you should see first the local.laurenz.ws

i will do so.... thanks Am 25.01.2017 um 08:46 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > Still > > Check this line from you named config. > > include "/etc/bind/named.conf.default-zones"; > > This can cause an overlap in the zones, so be carefull with that one. > > > Greetz, > > Louis > > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: samba

Yes I think so This is my /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf ddns-updates on; ddns-update-style interim; #ddns-update-style none; update-static-leases on; option domain-name-servers cd1.home.cu; option domain-name "home.cu"; default-lease-time 600; max-lease-time 7200; authoritative; include "/etc/bind/rndc.key"; #include "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab"; # deny

Hai Baptiste, You missed my first message but here it is again. . systemctl cat bind9 # /lib/systemd/system/bind9.service [Unit] Description=BIND Domain Name Server Documentation=man:named(8) After=network.target Wants=nss-lookup.target Before=nss-lookup.target [Service] EnvironmentFile=/etc/default/bind9 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/named -f $OPTIONS ExecReload=/usr/sbin/rndc reload

And some more information about this strange effect apparently no-one has seen before. I now added the missing zone: samba-tool dns zonecreate verdandi 10.16.172.in-addr.arpa -U Administrator and it claims that the zone is okay, but the next one is missing: Dec 29 10:31:12 verdandi named[2601]: Loading 'ad.microsult.de' using driver dlopen Dec 29 10:31:12 verdandi named[2601]:

-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 14:32:31 -0800 > Von: Matthieu Patou <mat at samba.org> > An: samba at lists.samba.org > Betreff: Re: [Samba] samba4 binddlz performance > On 11/19/2012 07:11 AM, Thomas Manninger wrote: > > Hello, > > > > i am using samba4rc2. > > > > I have problems with the bind9 dlz module, i get