similar to: Migration or Replication Samba 4 ADDC

Hi, I have a samba 4.4.5 AD domain and is working perfect, but now I need to add a second samba 4 AD, I have found that in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Join_an_additional_Samba_DC_to_an_existing_Active_Directory is detailed the correct steps, my question is about step related with winbind (tdbbackup) builtin groups, appears a message "*NOTE: Only do this if you are running a version of

Anyway everything seems to work well. The shares are correctly and users recognize them without problems. getent and wbinfo. The main problem is that apparently the Member DC does not get the UID properly containing the user in the ADDC. There is something that can change in the smb.conf the Member DC, I remember a few years ago with the same AD DC we get the UID correctly. 2016-06-14 12:58

On 14/06/16 18:36, Juan Ignacio wrote: > Traducir del: Inglés > Ok, I have correctly configured the option to use RFC2307 in the > Actide Directory Domain Controller and the option on the member server. > > But anyway still showing bad UIDs. > > Here we show how both configurations are actualemente. > > Within RSAT I can place the UID attribute for example uanaco. >

On 14/06/16 17:32, Juan Ignacio wrote: > Rowland, a question. > > > "is to copy idmap.ldap from the first DC to all others and then keep > them in sync, the other is to use RFC2307 attributes." > > I can do the same with my member server? Maybe it works, or not for > beign a member server. > > Maybe i can change my Member Server to a Domain Controller and

Hi Juan Am 06.09.2016 um 18:11 schrieb Juan Ignacio via samba: > I would like to know how I can migrate my current Samba 4.1 domain > controller to the virtual server or if is better create a new Domain > Controller virtualized as shown in the wiki and then turn off the primary > ADDC. > >

On 14/06/16 16:42, Juan Ignacio wrote: > The structure is as follows. > > AD DC (Samba 4.1)------------------- Member DC (Samba 4.4) > > private/idmap.ldb ----------------- not private/idmap.ldb > > > The idmap.ldb file you found, was this on a secondary AD DC ? > > -No the idmap.ldb i found was in the primary AD DC, im not have a > secondary AD DC, i

On 14/06/16 18:46, Juan Ignacio wrote: > Yes, im run ´´net cache flush´ on ADDC and MEMBER SERVER. > > Im using Win10, And Win7 > > > OK, if you are running RSAT on a windows 10 machine, can I suggest you use a windows 7 machine instead, it is my understanding that win10 no longer has the Unix attributes tab. If you use ADUC on a win7 machine, you can install IDMU, this will

On 14/06/16 16:16, Juan Ignacio wrote: > Sorry, this is the Domain Member smb.con > Im using Debian last version. > Samba compiled from the sources. > > [global] > netbios name = XXXXX > security = ADS > workgroup = XXXXXX > realm = XXXXXXX > > log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log > log level = 1 > > # idmap

On 14/06/16 15:36, Juan Ignacio wrote: > I go to answer all, here I go. > > Have you given your users a uidNumber attribute ? > > Not all, but im set it in my user and not work. > > Have you given 'Domain Users' (at least) a gidNumber attribute ? > > Not all, but im set it in my user and not work. > > If you have done the above, have you run 'net cache

Without UID and / or GID configured into AD database (into LDAP tree) Samba would give UID / GID to users and groups when needed, and as nothing is written, Samba has to guess. This guessing process is called id mapping. Samba does not synchronize generated file containing this ID map. No synchronization and xID random xID fathers to xID inconsistency. This is not necessarily an issue: with only

On 13/06/16 20:14, Rowland penny wrote: > On 13/06/16 19:37, Juan Ignacio wrote: >> Rowland: >> >> I'll use this email from now, the other does not work well. >> >> A few years ago around 2. >> >> We did everything that could be used for NIX and it worked. >> The main DC_AD had been provisioned without rfc2307 and we did later. >>

Legalizer will expand arithmetics using addc and adde. Is it not working for you? It works fine on x86, you can take a look how it's done. Evan On Sep 8, 2008, at 4:03 AM, Richard Pennington wrote: > My target doesn't support 64 bit arithmetic, so I'd like to supply > definitions for adde/addc. The problem is I can't seem to figure out > the > magic. Here's

On 5/30/2018 10:29 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev wrote: > For targets where ADDCARRY and SUBCARRY are legal, would it make sense > to expand ADDC/UADDO/ADDE/etc. into ADDCARRY (and same for sub)? SelectionDAG will never generate ADDC/ADDE on targets where they aren't legal.  Targets which custom-lower ADDCARRY generally also custom-lower UADDO; not sure what sort of expansion

Hello friends, I come to ask for a hand. I have an AD server with Samba 4.1 and added a Member Server 4.4 without problems. The only problem I'm having is that the UID of users in the Member Server are different from the AD server. Ad Server KENNEDY\florenciaelmone:*:3000679:100:Florencia Elmone Domingues:/home/KENNEDY/florenciaelmone:/bin/false Member Server

I have setup a ADDC Samba server and a winbind member server I have see that same user have UID/GID different from ADDC and member server # Addc (Fedora 29)[root at s-addc ~]# id d.lescauid=3000023(DOM\d.lesca) gid=100(users) gruppi=100(users),3000023(DOM\d.lesca),3000009(BUILTIN\users)[ root at s-addc ~]# rpm -q sambasamba-4.9.2-0.fc29.x86_64 # Member (Centos7)[root at s-dati ~]# id

On 5/30/2018 1:16 PM, Friedman, Eli wrote: > On 5/30/2018 10:29 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev wrote: >> For targets where ADDCARRY and SUBCARRY are legal, would it make sense >> to expand ADDC/UADDO/ADDE/etc. into ADDCARRY (and same for sub)? > > SelectionDAG will never generate ADDC/ADDE on targets where they aren't > legal.  Targets which custom-lower

> > I love diving : ) > Ok mathias, Can you explain this. This i dont get.... Why is this output so different, and i dont mean the difference with NTDOMAIN\.. See the groups differences... between a ADDC and a member server.. Samba 4.4.3 ADDC id someusername uid=10002(NTDOMAIN\someusername) gid=10000(NTDOMAIN\domain users) groups=10000(NTDOMAIN\domain

My target doesn't support 64 bit arithmetic, so I'd like to supply definitions for adde/addc. The problem is I can't seem to figure out the magic. Here's an example of what I need to generate: # two i64s in r5/r6 and r7/r8 # result in r1/r2, carry in r3 # adde add r2, r6, r8 cmpltu r3, r2, r6 # compute carry # addc add r1, r5, r7 add r1, zero, r3 Is this

On 15/06/16 14:49, Juan Ignacio wrote: > Are there any test I can do to see if need to configure something in > the member server? > If you have set up a domain member as show here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_Samba_as_an_AD_Domain_Member If you have given your users a uidNumber attribute and 'Domain Users' a gidNumber attribute, 'getent passwd username'

Evan Cheng wrote: > Legalizer will expand arithmetics using addc and adde. Is it not > working for you? It works fine on x86, you can take a look how it's > done. > > Evan The x86 has a carry bit, my target doesn't. It's not clear to me how I would specify the use of a general purpose register to contain the calculated carry in the current adde/addc scheme.