similar to: Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5

Hello guys, It is possible to work with the "dns-backend = SAMBA_INTERNAL" in Samba4 NT4 style? I followed the link below, but there was some errors. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_backend Errors: *# samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL* *lpcfg_load: refreshing parameters from /etc/samba/smb.conf* *params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file

Hi, Samba team! I am trying to install samba4 on FreeBSD 9.2 as a domain DC to join an existing samba4 domain controller on FreeBSD 9.2. I followed the instruction of: Samba4/HOWTO/Join a domain as a DC Everything is OK until I run the following command: root at mtm:/var/named/etc/namedb # samba-tool drs showrepl Default-First-Site-Name\MTM DSA Options: 0x00000001 DSA object GUID:

My BIND9.6.0 on FreeBSD 6.2 works fine when I manually start with: root@ns2# named -4 -S 1024 -c /etc/namedb/named.conf But it won't start on boot and no error messages or log. And it won't start using rndc, it cause error message. Why does the error shows port 953 when I specified for port 53 in the config? rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused Below are

I have a system running rsync in daemon mode, the version information: > rsync --version rsync version 2.6.8 protocol version 29 On another system I have: > authoritative# rsync --version rsync version 3.0.7 protocol version 30 I have the following problem when trying to fetch files from the system running the old daemon: # /usr/local/bin/rsync --protocol=29 -vvvvvvvv

Hi at all, i´am using samba 4.3.4 as "ad", "migrated by classicupgrade" some time ago from an nt4-domain. By trying samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ i get the following error: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/samba_upgradedns", line 262, in <module> paths, lp.configfile, lp) File

Hi ! Since few months, dreplsrv is eating lots of memory in few days. Within 2 weeks, the process is generaly OOM killed and replication become weired. I need to restart samba-ad-dc. Here is my config : - Samba 4.11.6 / 4 vcpu / 2Go Ram - 10215 objects (ldbs file = 300MB) This memory problem only happen on my headbridge DC (star topolgy with 20 DC) If I add some ram, the

Hi All, I'm trying to integrate Samba 4 DHCPD and Bind 9.9 into a complete solution. I'm using the BIND/Samba 4 DLZ plugin. DHCP by itself works and hands out IP addresses. What I would like to have happen is the following: - PC is joined to the Samba 4 domain (this works) - PC gets an IP via DHCPD - DHCP or the PC registers the IP in BIND Network PC's should resolve cleanly when

Hi, I'm trying to remove a DC from a site we have shutdown. The demote command is throwing up this message: [root at aragorn ~]# samba-tool domain demote --remove-other-dead-server=pippin Removing nTDSConnection: CN=eca08dbb-1f34-476e-96dd-33ec22b2bc94,CN=NTDS Settings,CN=GANDALF,CN=Servers,CN=SAOPAULO,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=e-trust,DC=com,DC=br Removing nTDSDSA: CN=NTDS

On 11/12/14 20:10, Elias Pereira wrote: > Hello guys, > > It is possible to work with the "dns-backend = SAMBA_INTERNAL" in Samba4 > NT4 style? In a word, *NO* A classic NT4 style domain does not have a DNS server built in, your server could use Bind9 or similar, but it wouldn't be part of samba. Rowland > > I followed the link below, but there was some errors.

Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 09:51:03 CET schrieb Rowland penny: > On 01/02/16 22:24, Markus Dellermann wrote: > > Hi at all, > > > > i´am using samba 4.3.4 as "ad", "migrated by classicupgrade" some time ago > > from an nt4-domain. > > > > By trying > > samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ > > > > i get the

On 02/02/16 11:26, Markus Dellermann wrote: > Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 09:51:03 CET schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 01/02/16 22:24, Markus Dellermann wrote: >>> Hi at all, >>> >>> i´am using samba 4.3.4 as "ad", "migrated by classicupgrade" some time ago >>> from an nt4-domain. >>> >>> By trying >>>

Hi When I install bind8 through ports it doesn't create the dir named 'namedb' and the needed files that it's supposed to do according to the handbook. Has anyother experienced this?

Hi Rowland and al. > On 02/02/16 11:26, Markus Dellermann wrote: >> Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 09:51:03 CET schrieb Rowland penny: >>> On 01/02/16 22:24, Markus Dellermann wrote: >>>> Hi at all, >>>> >>>> i´am using samba 4.3.4 as "ad", "migrated by classicupgrade" some >>>> time ago >>>> from an

Apologies, despite that error, the permissions now look good on the sysvol folder. Is there anything I need to do moving forward to keep my DCs idmap.ldbs in sync? or is this a one time thing? On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Taylor Hammerling <thammerling at tcsbasys.com > wrote: > ok, I followed the directions on that wikipage, made a hot backup, copied > the hot backup over to

zone "local.thisismycompany.com" { type slave; masters { *your DCs go here* }; file "/etc/bind/namedb/bak.local.thisismycompany.com"; forwarders{}; }; If you are setting up bind on the DC like that, you have a problem, you are not using DLZ. Rowland

Hai Cameron, If you run: named -V Does that version match with the setting in : For example "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf"; I'm running debian so change the path above to your file. # # This configures dynamically loadable zones (DLZ) from AD schema # Uncomment only single database line, depending on your BIND version # dlz "AD DNS Zone" { # For BIND

Hi, I'm having the following issue when trying to switch from samba_internal to bind9_dlz. I have been following the procedure here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_backend#Changing_from_Samba_Internal_DNS_to_BIND_DLZ I get the following: [root at dc2 ~]# /usr/local/sbin/samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Reading domain information Segmentation fault (core dumped)

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:31:57 +0100 Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 1 September 2016 at 13:15, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org > > wrote: > > > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:24:38 +0100 > > Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > >

On 2 September 2016 at 09:53, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org > wrote: > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:12:21 +0100 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > Trying to understand why you are getting the segfault, I set up freebsd > 11.0rc2 in a VM and then installed samba44, I now know where Gentoo > gets its ideas from

On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 13:19 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >  > > I have now found out why you had to provision with samba43, > the '--use-ntvfs' option is gone from Samba 4.4.x. I never noticed > because, as I said, I never used it. > This does of course mean that you cannot use the latest versions of > Samba as an AD DC with freebsd unless somehow either