similar to: Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:31:57 +0100 Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 1 September 2016 at 13:15, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org > > wrote: > > > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:24:38 +0100 > > Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > >

On 8 September 2016 at 08:17, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org > wrote: > On Thu, 08 Sep 2016 12:58:18 +1200 > Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 13:19 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > > > > > > > I have now found out why you had to provision with samba43, > > > the

Hi, I'm having the following issue when trying to switch from samba_internal to bind9_dlz. I have been following the procedure here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_backend# Changing_from_Samba_Internal_DNS_to_BIND_DLZ I get the following: [root at dc2 ~]# /usr/local/sbin/samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Reading domain information Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Hai Cameron, If you run: named -V Does that version match with the setting in : For example "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf"; I'm running debian so change the path above to your file. # # This configures dynamically loadable zones (DLZ) from AD schema # Uncomment only single database line, depending on your BIND version # dlz "AD DNS Zone" { # For BIND

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:12:21 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Trying to understand why you are getting the segfault, I set up freebsd 11.0rc2 in a VM and then installed samba44, I now know where Gentoo gets its ideas from :) After freebsd built everything in the chain of required packages, it finally built Samba, I did notice two things, one it built

On 2 September 2016 at 12:21, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org > wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:51:02 +0100 > Cameron Murdoch <cam at macaroon.net> wrote: > > > On 2 September 2016 at 09:53, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org > > > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:12:21 +0100 > > >

On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:03:05 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:41:47 +0100 > Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 2 September 2016 at 12:21, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org > > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:51:02 +0100

On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:41:47 +0100 Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 2 September 2016 at 12:21, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org > > wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:51:02 +0100 > > Cameron Murdoch <cam at macaroon.net> wrote: > > > > > On 2 September 2016 at 09:53, Rowland Penny via samba

On 2 September 2016 at 09:53, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org > wrote: > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:12:21 +0100 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > Trying to understand why you are getting the segfault, I set up freebsd > 11.0rc2 in a VM and then installed samba44, I now know where Gentoo > gets its ideas from

On 2 September 2016 at 13:19, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org > wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:03:05 +0100 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:41:47 +0100 > > Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On 2 September 2016 at 12:21, Rowland Penny

Hi, I'm having the following issue when trying to switch from samba_internal to bind9_dlz. I have been following the procedure here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_backend#Changing_from_Samba_Internal_DNS_to_BIND_DLZ I get the following: [root at dc2 ~]# /usr/local/sbin/samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Reading domain information Segmentation fault (core dumped)

On 2 September 2016 at 14:51, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org > wrote: > > > As I said, I know very little about freebsd, but you should be aware > that Samba only supports the last three major versions i.e. at the > moment 4.2.X, 4.3.x and 4.4.x > They are supported in three ways, the oldest version (now 4.2.x) only > gets security fixes, the middle

On 2/17/2016 5:00 AM, Rowland penny wrote: > On 17/02/16 00:03, Ian wrote: >> I've recently attempted to migrate some windows server files over to >> samba 4 hosted on a FreeNAS server. >> >> Using robocopy with the /copyall switch, I expected everything, >> including ACL's and ownership information to transfer over. For the >> most part they have.

Sorry for my previous email it was something wrong with my email client. Now is the corrected version: Hello, I have a problem with files locks on share. My server is running FreeBSD 10.2 (amd64) with ZFS pool (raidz) for windows share and samba 4.3.3 (ROLE_ACTIVE_DIRECTORY_DC). The server has approximately 100 users accounts and computers accounts. >From one windows workstation I open a

Very well. Here is the affected smb.conf. ------ [global] server min protocol = NT1 server max protocol = SMB3 interfaces = 127.0.0.1 10.0.0.8 bind interfaces only = yes encrypt passwords = yes dns proxy = no strict locking = no oplocks = yes deadtime = 15 max log size = 51200 max open files = 2830016 logging = file load printers = no

I have Googled my brains out without success, and I'm hoping that someone here can give me some tips. I'm trying to build a new file server, and I've concluded that ZFS is the technology that I want to use. After doing some research I settled on FreeBSD 10 as the platform to provide it. I have an existing AD domain (two Samba 4.1.4 DCs running on Debian) and the file server will be

On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 13:19 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >  > > I have now found out why you had to provision with samba43, > the '--use-ntvfs' option is gone from Samba 4.4.x. I never noticed > because, as I said, I never used it. > This does of course mean that you cannot use the latest versions of > Samba as an AD DC with freebsd unless somehow either

I am looking for where zfsacl settings such as, zfsacl: acesort = dontcare , are documented. Do I need NFS settings such as, nfs4: mode = simple , if I am not using NFS? If I do, where are they documented? Thanks

I've recently attempted to migrate some windows server files over to samba 4 hosted on a FreeNAS server. Using robocopy with the /copyall switch, I expected everything, including ACL's and ownership information to transfer over. For the most part they have. The one problem I've ran into however, is that I'm getting errors any time I or robocopy attempt to change the ownership to

On 18.07.2016 22:48, Achim Gottinger wrote: > > > Am 18.07.2016 um 11:45 schrieb Norbert Hanke: >> On 18.07.2016 01:52, Achim Gottinger wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 18.07.2016 um 01:02 schrieb Norbert Hanke: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I'm trying to join a samba 4 DC to an already existing samba 4 DC, >>>> both with