similar to: still nfs mountpoints do no work as samba shares?

On 01/09/16 15:57, Gaiseric Vandal via samba wrote: > In the past I used samba shares on top of autofs NFS > shares. I did not try samba over static NFS mounts > (file systems mounted by root manually or defined in > /etc/fstab.) I suspect therefore that you might have a > permissions issue. I said: ...seems ok on the clients but only - until a user want to change

In the past I used samba shares on top of autofs NFS shares. I did not try samba over static NFS mounts (file systems mounted by root manually or defined in /etc/fstab.) I suspect therefore that you might have a permissions issue. I had several servers running NFS and Samba, so this meant that user id's were consistent across all machines for both nfs/unix and samba.

Am 02.09.2016 um 10:46 schrieb lejeczek via samba: > NFS box and Samba box are in separate domains and I don't know just yet > how to make them trust each other. NFS is IPA and Samba is just own BDC. > What even more peculiar - linux smb client also does not suffer from > this problem. I can in Gnome edit files and do things that Win 7 refuses > to do most likely because the

Hello, Actually I have some troubels concerning samba (3.0.24) on debian (4.0): I would like to have some samba-shares on a nfs-filesystem. NFS works fine for the Linux clients and the Linux server. The nfs filesystem is mounted from an other server on /home. The next step is to set up samba to have some shares on the nfs Filesystem (/home/$LOGIN, anonymized configuration attached).

Hello, I am using the vfs_gpfs samba module to map ACLs through samba. It works fine on files, but directory ACLs are ignored. Ex: getfacl /sb/share/myplace/ file: sb/share/myplace/ owner: root group: root user::rwx user:afrankel:rwx group::--- mask::rwx other::--- When I try to access this folder in Windows, I get permission denied. The same permissions on a files, I can open it / modify it

On 2/17/2016 5:00 AM, Rowland penny wrote: > On 17/02/16 00:03, Ian wrote: >> I've recently attempted to migrate some windows server files over to >> samba 4 hosted on a FreeNAS server. >> >> Using robocopy with the /copyall switch, I expected everything, >> including ACL's and ownership information to transfer over. For the >> most part they have.

It's probably difting slightly off the topic, but I know that there are some people listening here, who have a decent expertise. I'm trying to setup a file server (nfs4 at ad.domain) and mount from a client (hunin at ad.domain) using the user database and especially Kerberos provided by my AD (samba at ad.domain). It already works nicely, if I forget about krb5, i.e. idmapd is

All test machines are CentOS 5.5 (RHEL subscriptions purchased). We've had NFS3 storage working fine and decided to try NFS4. We can mount an NFS4 share on our KVM host, but the SELinux file context on the mountpoint directory is magically changed from virt_image_t to nfs_t. Restorecon refuses to change it back. Adding the mount option context=system_u:object_r:virt_image_t on either server

... as follows : rpm -qa | grep samba samba-3.6.23-35.el6_8.x86_64 samba-common-3.6.23-35.el6_8.x86_64 samba-winbind-clients-3.6.23-35.el6_8.x86_64 samba-winbind-3.6.23-35.el6_8.x86_64 [global] workgroup = ABC realm = ABC.COM security = ADS restrict anonymous = 1 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 client signing = required server signing = Yes

Thank you for that, i did have a good look at that one. And i use Debian 9, if you test what i posted below in the thread, you will see NFSv4 works fine. Below is missing one more thing, the "allow to delegate (kerberos only) " on the computer object in the AD, should be enabled. And yes, i've see bugchecks also but only on my debian .. Lenny.. Stt.. ;-) .. Its my last lenny

Hi, What is the magic juju that I have to put in /etc/sysconfig/autofs to get autofs to default to using NFSv4, rather than NFSv3, for mounting file systems? I don't want to place these flags into the automount maps themselves because we have a varied network with Sun, CentOS, RedHat and Macintosh systems, and the flags that have to get added to automount maps (which we distribute centrally

All, Running Samba 3.5.4 on Solaris 10 with ZFS file system. I have issues where we have shared group folders. In these folders a userA in GroupA create file just fine with the correct inherited permissions 660. Problem is when userB in GroupA reads and modifies that file, with M$ office apps, the permissions get whacked to 060+ and the file becomes read only by everyone. I did

Hi all, At some point recently my customers can no longer see GPFS snapshots under the Windows Previous Versions tab. It simply says "No previous versions available". If a fileset is exported with the flag "force user = root" then Previous Versions *are* displayed. [2016/07/06 10:07:35.602080, 3] ../source3/smbd/vfs.c:1322(check_reduced_name) check_reduced_name:

Sorry for my previous email it was something wrong with my email client. Now is the corrected version: Hello, I have a problem with files locks on share. My server is running FreeBSD 10.2 (amd64) with ZFS pool (raidz) for windows share and samba 4.3.3 (ROLE_ACTIVE_DIRECTORY_DC). The server has approximately 100 users accounts and computers accounts. >From one windows workstation I open a

... no, no sssd. Basically we had : id -a "localuser" uid=17057 id -a "ABC+aduser" uid=17057 ... file ownership started getting wrecked so we are looking for a way to correct. On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 14/07/16 11:01, Shaun Glass wrote: > > ... as follows : > > rpm -qa | grep samba >

Hi, I have a two server setup that acts as SMB as well as NFS servers in active/active configuration managed by CTDB(http://ctdb.samba.org/). When a file is updated by SMB clients(followed by file-close), other SMB clients can see and modify the file. But when a NFS client (same user) updates the same file(followed by file-close), only one SMB server can see the updates. The clients mounting

Hi, Upgraded the samba from 4.7.7 to 4.9.3 in debian. Trying to get Samba AD 4.9.3 as a Kerberos source for nfs4. Until 4.7.7 able to mount the nfs4 over krb5 security. After upgrade unable to mount it. Suggest me is there any configure change in 4.9.3. Please look the following configuration. [Global] available= yes restrict anonymous= 0 Workgroup= SAM netbios name= x2 realm= SAM.COM password

How can I best handle file & directory permissions & inheritance when accessing the same data on a remote server from Windows clients through a CIFS share and Linux clients through an NFS export? I have Samba AD working and I believe Winbind is working because when I check permissions from the command line, whether locally on the server or a remote Linux client, with ls, getfacl,

Good Day All, We have an issue where the following in smb.conf : idmap uid = 10000-20000 ... it is resulting in assigned id's clashing with id's in passwd. What are the repercussions should we change to say the following : idmap uid = 20000-30000 Many thanks. Regards Shaun

Hi, I'm currently using nis/nfs3/autofs in a small network (20 boxes), and planning on using a more secure/elegant method. The thing is, which solution to adopt ? The network is mainly composed of Centos boxes, and a couple MS/Win ones. ldap/kerberos/nfs4 ? Directory Server ? Anything else ? Another point is, we have several servers with a local /data. Is there any solution to make each /data