Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5"
2016 Sep 01
0
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:31:57 +0100
Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On 1 September 2016 at 13:15, Rowland Penny via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org
> > wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:24:38 +0100
> > Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
2016 Sep 10
1
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On 8 September 2016 at 08:17, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org
> wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Sep 2016 12:58:18 +1200
> Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 13:19 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I have now found out why you had to provision with samba43,
> > > the
2016 Sep 01
6
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
Hi,
I'm having the following issue when trying to switch from samba_internal to
bind9_dlz. I have been following the procedure here:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_backend#
Changing_from_Samba_Internal_DNS_to_BIND_DLZ
I get the following:
[root at dc2 ~]# /usr/local/sbin/samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ
Reading domain information
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
2016 Sep 01
0
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
Hai Cameron,
If you run:
named -V
Does that version match with the setting in :
For example "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf";
I'm running debian so change the path above to your file.
#
# This configures dynamically loadable zones (DLZ) from AD schema
# Uncomment only single database line, depending on your BIND version
#
dlz "AD DNS Zone" {
# For BIND
2016 Sep 02
2
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:12:21 +0100
Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
Trying to understand why you are getting the segfault, I set up freebsd
11.0rc2 in a VM and then installed samba44, I now know where Gentoo
gets its ideas from :)
After freebsd built everything in the chain of required packages, it
finally built Samba, I did notice two things, one it built
2016 Sep 02
2
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On 2 September 2016 at 12:21, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org
> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:51:02 +0100
> Cameron Murdoch <cam at macaroon.net> wrote:
>
> > On 2 September 2016 at 09:53, Rowland Penny via samba
> > <samba at lists.samba.org
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:12:21 +0100
> > >
2016 Sep 02
4
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:03:05 +0100
Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:41:47 +0100
> Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> > On 2 September 2016 at 12:21, Rowland Penny via samba
> > <samba at lists.samba.org
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:51:02 +0100
2016 Sep 02
0
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:41:47 +0100
Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On 2 September 2016 at 12:21, Rowland Penny via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org
> > wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:51:02 +0100
> > Cameron Murdoch <cam at macaroon.net> wrote:
> >
> > > On 2 September 2016 at 09:53, Rowland Penny via samba
2016 Sep 02
0
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On 2 September 2016 at 09:53, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org
> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:12:21 +0100
> Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> >
>
> Trying to understand why you are getting the segfault, I set up freebsd
> 11.0rc2 in a VM and then installed samba44, I now know where Gentoo
> gets its ideas from
2016 Sep 02
0
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On 2 September 2016 at 13:19, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org
> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:03:05 +0100
> Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:41:47 +0100
> > Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On 2 September 2016 at 12:21, Rowland Penny
2016 Aug 29
0
samba_upgradedns seg fault - Samba 4.4.5
Hi,
I'm having the following issue when trying to switch from samba_internal to
bind9_dlz. I have been following the procedure here:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_backend#Changing_from_Samba_Internal_DNS_to_BIND_DLZ
I get the following:
[root at dc2 ~]# /usr/local/sbin/samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ
Reading domain information
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
2016 Sep 02
1
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On 2 September 2016 at 14:51, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org
> wrote:
>
>
> As I said, I know very little about freebsd, but you should be aware
> that Samba only supports the last three major versions i.e. at the
> moment 4.2.X, 4.3.x and 4.4.x
> They are supported in three ways, the oldest version (now 4.2.x) only
> gets security fixes, the middle
2016 Feb 17
2
Can one set the owner of a folder to BUILTIN\Administrators?
On 2/17/2016 5:00 AM, Rowland penny wrote:
> On 17/02/16 00:03, Ian wrote:
>> I've recently attempted to migrate some windows server files over to
>> samba 4 hosted on a FreeNAS server.
>>
>> Using robocopy with the /copyall switch, I expected everything,
>> including ACL's and ownership information to transfer over. For the
>> most part they have.
2016 Jan 06
1
problem with files locks
Sorry for my previous email it was something wrong with my email client.
Now is the corrected version:
Hello,
I have a problem with files locks on share. My server is running
FreeBSD 10.2 (amd64) with ZFS pool (raidz) for windows share and samba
4.3.3 (ROLE_ACTIVE_DIRECTORY_DC).
The server has approximately 100 users accounts and computers accounts.
>From one windows workstation I open a
2017 Feb 08
2
Need help troubleshooting TCP thrashing, possible kernel bug?
Very well. Here is the affected smb.conf.
------
[global]
server min protocol = NT1
server max protocol = SMB3
interfaces = 127.0.0.1 10.0.0.8
bind interfaces only = yes
encrypt passwords = yes
dns proxy = no
strict locking = no
oplocks = yes
deadtime = 15
max log size = 51200
max open files = 2830016
logging = file
load printers = no
2014 Feb 25
5
Problems building FreeBSD file server
I have Googled my brains out without success, and I'm hoping that someone
here can give me some tips. I'm trying to build a new file server, and
I've concluded that ZFS is the technology that I want to use. After doing
some research I settled on FreeBSD 10 as the platform to provide it.
I have an existing AD domain (two Samba 4.1.4 DCs running on Debian) and
the file server will be
2016 Sep 08
0
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 13:19 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>
>
> I have now found out why you had to provision with samba43,
> the '--use-ntvfs' option is gone from Samba 4.4.x. I never noticed
> because, as I said, I never used it.
> This does of course mean that you cannot use the latest versions of
> Samba as an AD DC with freebsd unless somehow either
2010 Aug 19
1
zfsacl and nfs4 settings
I am looking for where zfsacl settings such as, zfsacl: acesort =
dontcare , are documented.
Do I need NFS settings such as, nfs4: mode = simple , if I am not using
NFS? If I do, where are they documented?
Thanks
2016 Feb 17
4
Can one set the owner of a folder to BUILTIN\Administrators?
I've recently attempted to migrate some windows server files over to
samba 4 hosted on a FreeNAS server.
Using robocopy with the /copyall switch, I expected everything,
including ACL's and ownership information to transfer over. For the
most part they have. The one problem I've ran into however, is that I'm
getting errors any time I or robocopy attempt to change the ownership to
2016 Jul 18
3
samba 4.4.5 DC with bind9: DNS update failing with NOTAUTH
On 18.07.2016 22:48, Achim Gottinger wrote:
>
>
> Am 18.07.2016 um 11:45 schrieb Norbert Hanke:
>> On 18.07.2016 01:52, Achim Gottinger wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 18.07.2016 um 01:02 schrieb Norbert Hanke:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to join a samba 4 DC to an already existing samba 4 DC,
>>>> both with