similar to: Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5

On 1 September 2016 at 13:15, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org > wrote: > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:24:38 +0100 > Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm having the following issue when trying to switch from > > samba_internal to bind9_dlz. I have been following the procedure here: > >

Hai Cameron, If you run: named -V Does that version match with the setting in : For example "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf"; I'm running debian so change the path above to your file. # # This configures dynamically loadable zones (DLZ) from AD schema # Uncomment only single database line, depending on your BIND version # dlz "AD DNS Zone" { # For BIND

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:31:57 +0100 Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 1 September 2016 at 13:15, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org > > wrote: > > > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:24:38 +0100 > > Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > >

I am trying to setup samba to use the bind9 backend, but a folder is missing in Samba, according to the WIKI page. This seems to be consistent, as there are several files and folders that are not where they should be, according to the wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End That page says there should be a folder at /usr/local/samba/bind-dns, but it's not there. I've

On 8 September 2016 at 08:17, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org > wrote: > On Thu, 08 Sep 2016 12:58:18 +1200 > Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 13:19 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > > > > > > > I have now found out why you had to provision with samba43, > > > the

On 2 September 2016 at 14:51, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org > wrote: > > > As I said, I know very little about freebsd, but you should be aware > that Samba only supports the last three major versions i.e. at the > moment 4.2.X, 4.3.x and 4.4.x > They are supported in three ways, the oldest version (now 4.2.x) only > gets security fixes, the middle

On 2015-08-21 14:11, Brady, Mike wrote: > On 2015-08-21 12:52, John Gardeniers wrote: >> Hi Brady, >> >> I realise that but the only named.conf to be found on the system is my >> newly created /etc/named.conf. Either something screwed up when >> installing the Sernet RPMs, which is really pretty unlikely given that >> everything else is working, or the file

Hi, I'm having the following issue when trying to switch from samba_internal to bind9_dlz. I have been following the procedure here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_backend#Changing_from_Samba_Internal_DNS_to_BIND_DLZ I get the following: [root at dc2 ~]# /usr/local/sbin/samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Reading domain information Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Dear all, I have a few question regarding to DNS and upgrading from Samba 4.1.17 to 4.4.2. After reading about the Badlock Bug, I feel the urge to upgrade my Samba installation and to move from BIND9_FLATFILE to SAMBA_INTERNAL_DNS. I am using Samba version 4.1.17. During provisioning (some years ago) I have decided to use BIND9_FLATFILE. At this moment I would like to upgrade to Samba 4.4.2 and

Hello! Yes already tried this, both he always says that the account already exists even if it does not exist, it affects only dicamicas entries, entries staticas work and replication as well, but as dynamic are troubled by instances in Multiple Sites will have problems ... But some log or command that can help? Thanks Em 30-12-2015 18:38, Rowland penny escreveu: > On 30/12/15 19:57,

Hai? ? Im running:?debian wheezy, sernet samba 4.1.3 , DC, in windows 2008 AD domain. ? Im reading the wiki and i stumbled on this. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns-backend_bind? semanage fcontext -a -t named_var_run_t /usr/local/samba/private/dns/${MYREALM}.zone semanage fcontext -a -t named_var_run_t /usr/local/samba/private/dns/${MYREALM}.zone.jnl the strange thing is, and this is

Hi, I have updated my DC's to Samba 4.10.7, but I still can't add a new DC to the domain. I believe the problem is with Samba Internal DNS. So I would like to convert my DNS from Internal DNS to Bind9_DLZ of the production DC's. Then I will join a new DC to the domain to see if it works. I checked the tutorials: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_BIND_DNS_Server

> > I have been doing a bit of investigation and I 'think' we do have a tool > ;-) > Gooooooooddd!! :-) > If you examine 'samba_upgradedns', at the top it says this: > # Upgrade DNS provision from BIND9_FLATFILE to BIND9_DLZ or SAMBA_INTERNAL > I think if you use it to upgrade to either BIND_DLZ or SAMBA_INTERNAL, > it should create the required AD

On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 17:05:21 -0500 Sonic via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Finally biting the bullet and upgrading some old Samba servers. > This particular server is running 4.10.16 and as a first step I'm > attempting to upgrade it to 4.12.15 (I think I remember something > about 4.11.x not handling the upgrade properly). > > Samba seems to run OK but

Hello! I've got this error dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable when running samba_dnsupdate --verbose With this error dynamic entries stopped working as Type A machines that entered in the field or entry to a new DC. Already tried the step described here https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable But when trying to delete the account used the

Il giorno mar 17 dic 2019 alle ore 17:49 Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> ha scritto: In the last year this has come up a few times, try reading this > > https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/817470/how-to-reconfigure-an-msdcs-subdomain-to-a-forest-wide-dns-application > It looks like we need a tool to correct AD :-( > Thanks! I will read that article. Do

On 1/2/2018 12:25 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 12:09:33 -0500 > lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >>     Installing bind9 on my Ubuntu 14.04 via. apt-get displays the >> following options. >> >>  #named -V >> BIND 9.9.5-3ubuntu0.16-Ubuntu (Extended Support Version) >>

yes i realized that there is something wrong with BIND9_FLATFILE while encountering with samba_upgradedns -h which doesn't show BIND9_FLATFILE Any help on*drs repl* not working i think it is pointing to wrong FQDN how do i correct that ? > >/ Not able to to view replication.(samba-tool drs showrepl) > />/ > />/ > />/ [root at dc2

Hi, I'm folowing the tutorial: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End But, the follows file there isn't in my DC, so can I to create it manually? /usr/local/samba/bind-dns/named.conf file and uncomment the module for your BIND version. For example: dlz "AD DNS Zone" { # For BIND 9.10 database "dlopen

On 2015-08-21 16:30, John Gardeniers wrote: > Hi Mike, > > I wonder if I'm missing the file because I only did a classicupgrade, > rather than a provision and perhaps then the file(s) is/are not > created. > > regards, > John > > > On 21/08/15 13:45, Brady, Mike wrote: >> On 2015-08-21 14:11, Brady, Mike wrote: >>> On 2015-08-21 12:52, John