similar to: spawning smbd's

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jim Ballantine <j.ballantine at gmail.com> Date: Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 7:16 AM Subject: spawning smbd's To: samba at lists.samba.org We are running a Red Hat Linux 6 system with samba 3.6.23 installed, and configured as a stand alone server. A couple of users are either spawning excessive numbers of smbd, or failing to kill them off. A

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:39:04AM -0400, Jim Ballantine via samba wrote: > We are running a Red Hat Linux 6 system with samba 3.6.23 installed, and > configured as a stand alone > server. A couple of users are either spawning excessive numbers of smbd, > or failing to kill them Is this smbds in "D" state? If so, please contact RedHat. That's a kernel bug, or something

In http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/R/Rhelp02a/archive/14637.html some rudimentary R functions were given for drawing proportional area venn diagrams with area of each intersection ~ the count in a 2 x 2 x 2 table. I'm interested in this, for another application: showing the correlations among Y, X1, X2 using area ~ r^2 of each pair (sometimes called a Ballantine diagram). Before I attempt

Hello, Does anyone have problem with spawning smbd daemon (own by root)? I thought there should be only one smbd daemon running that is owned by root and any other smbd should be owned by users who is using Samba services. Description of my system: Samba-2.0.0 on Compac Proliant x86 running Solaris 2.6 -- --------------------------------------------------- Sunny Hwang Guzman

SLES 9 Service Pack 2 Samba 3.0.14 We are currently experiencing an issue with multiple smbd processes spawning. Do you have any suggestions as how to alleviate this condition or patch this problem? Or is this a configuration issues? Thanks, Mark Naumowicz IT Administrator The Equitable Trust Company 30 St. Clair Ave. West Suite 700 Toronto, Ont. M4V 3A1 416-515-7000 xt365

I'm running the latest version of ubuntu with Samba "smbd 3.0.24" and for some reason I the server is spawning multiple like 50-100 instances of smbd. I try stopping samba, but the processes keep running. This is a very small network with only a few clients.like 4...so I'm not sure what the issue is. I've been using samba for years and have never seen it spawn processes like

Hi, We're running Samba (3.0.28-1.el5_2.1) on a Redhat (5.2) server using winbind to authenticate against a Windows AD. This all worked fine for a while. But now we have the problem that (some) users coming from Linux clients cause an excessive amount of smbd processes. We had 1 user who had more than 1700 smbd processes all coming from the same client. While on the client side there

I am having a problem with my Samba machine, here are the details. The machine in question is running FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE on a Dual PIII/XEON 550. I downloaded the source for Samba-2.2.3a and compiled without a hitch. I also setup SWAT to run through an stunnel(ssl) pipe. SWAT configuration of Samba worked great, but if I start the daemons(smbd & nmbd) from SWAT, smbd seems to keep creating

I have a lot of people whispering "zfs" in my virtual ear these days, and at the same time I have an irrational attachment to xfs based entirely on its lack of the 32000 subdirectory limit. I''m not afraid of ext4''s newness, since really a lot of that stuff has been in Lustre for years. So a-benchmarking I went. Results at the bottom:

Hi, I am using a cluster with LAM 7.1.3/MPI 2 and R 2.6.0. Rmpi version 0.5-5 is working very well. Now I have tested "Rmpi 0.5-6". During spawning the Rslaves I get an error: MPI_Error_string: error spawning process > sessionInfo() R version 2.6.0 (2007-10-03) x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu locale:

Hi, I am using rsync 3.0.4 on a WinXP machine (with CygWin) to synchronize my files to a RedHat Linux server. Everything is working perfectly, but there is one thing I do not understand. Apparently there is a difference in pushing and pulling files with rsync. When I push my files to the server with this command, I see one rsync process on my WinXP machine, just as expected rsync -rlt -e

I have two questions regarding number portability... 1) If I port a DID over to Voicepulse, can I then move that DID elsewhere somewhere down the road. Or does voicepulse now OWN that DID? 2) Can I take a DID assigned by Voicepulse and transfer it to someone else? If not, why? -jwb

I've currently got a samba 4.0.6-GIT-3f8ea16 deployment that's spawning many (250 or more) smbd processes whenever a backup runs and starts backing up files that have samba ACL's attached to them. (Such as the 'sysvol' volume) This will effectively lock up the machine until I've restarted samba and killed the backup job. If the backup is still running, samba will

Hi! I''ve just a created a really simple rails scheduled worker for backgroundrb to start playing with : class SessionCleanerWorker < BackgrounDRb::Worker::RailsBase def do_work(args) logger.info "SessionCleaner> started" CGI::Session::ActiveRecordStore::Session.destroy_all( [''updated_at <?'', 120.minutes.ago] )

Stoped and restarted smbd and nmbd. Logged out of NT user account and logged back in. Tried to acces the shares on Linux The message box I get is, \\myhost\root is not accessible The handle is invalid. On Linux, now I see 2 processes of smbd running. Why is smbd spawning? Subba Rao subb3@attglobal.net http://pws.prserv.net/truemax/ => Time is relative. Here is a new way to look at time.

Hi all, I am noticing some strange behaviour so I am bringing to this list. In the past when I have submitted bugs to bugzilla, I have come here first for confirmation/advice. Hopefully this is appropriate. Upgrading from R 3.5.2 to R 3.5.3 seems to have elicited some strange behaviour on my Windows machine. R seems to have trouble spawning a new process on my machine. You can noticing with all

While we were trying out a new capistrano setup tonight we noticed that the spawner would alternately spawn fcgi processes, then the next time it would kill them, then create, then kill, etc... >From everything I can see/read/know, spawn-fcgi should not affect running processes, right? Anyone else see this weird behavior? For now we are using the ''check the port before

I wasn't sure how to respond to John Byrd's post, since it wasn't addressed to me. So I've responded to Nicolai's. I'm reasonably far along in the process of writing a new Programmer's Guide for TableGen. I will continue working on it and submit it for review. I expect to do some rewriting as a result. John: Would you like me to respect a copyright on your documents

Dear All. I'm very new to CT, but attracted by asterisk. I plan to start learn to build IVR, based on asterisk. Do I need FXO/FXS card to start building simple IVR box ? Can I use OEM X100P - FXO PCI Card ( http://www.digitnetworks.com/store/product_info.php?products_id=28 ) to start build an IVR box ? What is the cheapest FXO PCI card that can use with asterisk to build my first IVR box ?

hi, i have a app which has a spiky activity, there a large period of inactivity between request. With phusion-passenger after a period of inactivity the process is killed, and when the app is respawned the ''show status'' queries take more time than the actual sql themself. I know that ActiveRecord makes the ''show status'' query once on spawning the server, but is