similar to: Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%"

2016 Aug 30
2
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 07:46 +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 14:29 -0300, Maiquel Consalter via samba wrote: > > > > Hi Group, > > i have 3 DC with samba4 with Centos 7, they are showing the CPU > > with > > 100% > > in all DC. The centos 7 is the basic installation and samba4 > > compile.I have > > 2.000 machine
2016 Aug 19
2
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
Follow: * Which process consumes the 100% of your CPU? samba, smbd, winbind...? A: samba * Does the CPU load goes up directly after you start up Samba? When does this happen? A: load goes up 1 minute after start samba. * What version are you currently running? Your "server string" says 4.3.1. Is this correct? What happens if you update to 4.4.5? A lot of things have been fixed in the
2016 Aug 19
3
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 20:48:19 +0200 Marc Muehlfeld via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Maiquel, > > Am 19.08.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Maiquel Consalter via samba: > > i have 3 DC with samba4 with Centos 7, they are showing the CPU > > with 100% in all DC. The centos 7 is the basic installation and > > samba4 compile.I have 2.000 machine authenticated in
2016 Aug 29
2
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
Hi Rowland, we make the classic upgrade samba3 fo samba4. We use this link https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Migrating_a_Samba_NT4_domain_to_a_Samba_AD_domain_(classic_upgrade) tks. 2016-08-29 15:01 GMT-03:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:25:25 -0300 > Maiquel Consalter <maiquelconsalter at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Let-me
2016 Aug 24
3
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
Tks Rowland, its work. But same with the new installation the server goes up for 100%. We dont have the Iptables enabled. Maybe if enable the iptables the cpu is goes down. what do you think ? 2016-08-23 16:42 GMT-03:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:06:19 -0300 > Maiquel Consalter via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >
2016 Aug 22
4
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
Hi, i changed the options but the problem it's the same. I removed the dns forward, schema and smb2 leases = yes, but after 5 minutes the process smbd groes up for 100%. Follow the error (log leve = 3). http://pasted.co/6f36cf12 2016-08-21 5:54 GMT-03:00 Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org>: > Hi Maiquel, > > Am 20.08.2016 um 21:03 schrieb Maiquel Consalter via samba: >
2016 Sep 07
1
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
Hi Andrew, sorry about delay. I make the change in smb.conf but the problem still the same. I think i have problem with DNS, i check all config in DNS. Tks for your feedback. 2016-08-30 20:34 GMT-03:00 Maiquel Consalter <maiquelconsalter at gmail.com>: > Thanks a lot Andrew. > Tomorrow I will test and report for you. > > Em terça-feira, 30 de agosto de 2016, Andrew Bartlett
2016 Aug 19
0
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
Hi Maiquel, Am 19.08.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Maiquel Consalter via samba: > i have 3 DC with samba4 with Centos 7, they are showing the CPU with 100% > in all DC. The centos 7 is the basic installation and samba4 compile.I have > 2.000 machine authenticated in this DC, is WinX, Win7, Win8 and Win10 . > Someone have problem with samba4 with centos cpu 100%. ? * Which process consumes
2016 Aug 30
0
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
Hi Andrew, >Also, how many users, groups and in particular group members in each >group (and in total)? >If you have large numbers of group members, then Samba 4.5 will help a >lot. We have 53k users and 580 groups. 2016-08-30 5:17 GMT-03:00 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org>: > On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 07:46 +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > > On Fri,
2016 Aug 29
3
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
Sorry Rowland, my mistake. We used this command: samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/usr/local/samba.PDC/dbdir --use-xattrs=yes --realm=domain.br --dns-backend=SAMBA_INTERNAL /usr/local/samba.PDC/etc/samba/smb.conf.PDC Sorry about wrong information. 2016-08-29 15:22 GMT-03:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:14:07 -0300 > Maiquel
2016 Aug 29
6
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
im not at a computer ti look some things up but im thinking.. dbdir=/usr/local/samba.PDC/dbdirwhat is the size of this dir. what is the size of the ad db dir on every server now. i think, something in the old db import causes a resyncwhen you modify something in the db  so i suggest try monitoring, disk io and cpu, look for buzzy files.  if we know the files, we know the processes using it.
2016 Aug 29
2
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
On 8/29/2016 3:33 PM, Maiquel Consalter via samba wrote: > Follow, our old config: http://pastebin.com/kpfATT0h > > tks. > > 2016-08-29 16:18 GMT-03:00 L.P.H. van Belle via samba <samba at lists.samba.org >> : >> im not at a computer ti look some things up but im thinking.. >> >> >> dbdir=/usr/local/samba.PDC/dbdirwhat is the size of this dir.
2016 Aug 20
2
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
Hi Marc, I need remove some line in smb.conf for sysvol ? or just is bug in gedit for view ? tks. 2016-08-20 10:02 GMT-03:00 Marc Muehlfeld via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > Am 19.08.2016 um 20:55 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > Hi Marc, it is there, I suppose you were a bit like me, your eyes > > glazed over looking at all those lines LOL > > No, it was
2016 Aug 29
1
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
On 8/29/2016 3:45 PM, Maiquel Consalter wrote: > My version is 4.4.5. > Thanks. > > 2016-08-29 16:41 GMT-03:00 lingpanda101--- via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>>: > > On 8/29/2016 3:33 PM, Maiquel Consalter via samba wrote: > > Follow, our old config: http://pastebin.com/kpfATT0h > > tks. >
2016 Aug 30
2
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:15:30 -0300 Maiquel Consalter <maiquelconsalter at gmail.com> wrote: > >From reading his old smb.conf it appears it was, but I noticed > >something: > >Maiquel, can you run this command on a DC and report back with the > >result. > >ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb -b >
2016 Aug 30
2
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 11:15 -0300, Maiquel Consalter wrote: > Hi Andrew,  > > >Also, how many users, groups and in particular group members in each > >group (and in total)? > >If you have large numbers of group members, then Samba 4.5 will help > a > >lot. > We have 53k users and 580 groups.  OK.  Then your spinner is the client-side replication code.  Samba
2016 Aug 30
1
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:51:35 -0300 Maiquel Consalter <maiquelconsalter at gmail.com> wrote: > Let me show-you myconfig. Can be the error in CTRL V + CTRL C sorry > about that > > > /etc/samba/smb.conf > workgroup = DOMAIN.BR > realm = CAMPUS.DOMAIN.BR > > /etc/krb5.conf > [libdefaults] > dns_lookup_realm = false > ticket_lifetime = 24h >
2016 Aug 29
2
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
Let-me explain my environment. I have 3 DCI 105 (Principal) 106 and 101 (where i use for test). All DC its CPU for grow up for 100%. I just make the change in one DC, not all ok ? > How did you provision samba, what were the exact commands used ? samba-tool domain provision --realm=DOMAIN.BR --domain=DOMAIN --server-role=dc --adminpass=pwd > /etc/resolv.conf search domain.br nameserver
2016 Aug 29
2
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 08:09:46 -0300 Maiquel Consalter via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Folks, > i tryed make some tests, but the problem it the same. Someone have > some idea how i solve my problem ? I try the new instalation, upgrade > all packates but before 1 minute the process still in 100% and the > process is rpc_server. > You say you have compiled
2016 Aug 29
4
Samba4 Centos 7 - CPU 100%
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 09:53:33 -0300 Maiquel Consalter <maiquelconsalter at gmail.com> wrote: > >You say you have compiled Samba yourself, so I take it that Samba is > i>nstalled at /usr/local/samba, if so, is the new samba in your PATH > i>and > >are there any OS Samba packages installed ? > I compile myself. I removed all packets for samba before start the >