similar to: File Create Mask - did something change since the update?

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:42:08 +0200 > Viktor Trojanovic via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > After updating Samba last Friday (from 4.3.3-1 to 4.4.5-1), some > > issues appeared that weren't there before. > > > >

On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:42:08 +0200 Viktor Trojanovic via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > After updating Samba last Friday (from 4.3.3-1 to 4.4.5-1), some > issues appeared that weren't there before. > > Consider the following share (on a domain member): > > [sharename] > path = /srv/samba/sharename > guest ok = no > writeable =

On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:25:11 +0200 Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > Thanks for finding this for me. I admit, I don't see how my issue is > connected to the described "traverse folder" right, so I am not > exactly clear on what I'm supposed to do now. Are you saying the bug > fix created a new bug that I'm affected by,

Hi Rowland, Thanks for replying again. On 13 May 2018 at 18:12, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sun, 13 May 2018 17:39:39 +0200 > Viktor Trojanovic via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > [...] > > > username map = /etc/samba/samba_usermap > > What is in the 'samba_usermap' ? > !root =

I just joined a freshly installed Linux machine with Samba 4.11.6 to my Windows AD, as a domain member. Followed the Wiki to a T, domain join without errors, I can enumerate users/groups, I can create shares and work with them from Windows (all that matters to me). Unfortunately, however, I don't seem to be able to change share security settings, i.e. ACL from Windows. Whenever I do so, I get

On 22.09.2019 15:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 22/09/2019 13:53, Viktor Trojanovic via samba wrote: >> I just ran "apt upgrade" on my DC (Ubuntu 18.04, Samba 4.10 from Louis >> Repo) and it ended with error messages about unmet dependencies in >> regards >> to libldb1. >> > Yes, but did you run 'apt-get update' first ? > >

On 22.09.2019 15:30, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 22/09/2019 14:10, Viktor Trojanovic via samba wrote: >> On 22.09.2019 15:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 22/09/2019 13:53, Viktor Trojanovic via samba wrote: >>>> I just ran "apt upgrade" on my DC (Ubuntu 18.04, Samba 4.10 from Louis >>>> Repo) and it ended with error messages

On 25.01.2016 14:13, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > Hi Ole, > > Unless you want to add functionality that is new since 1511, I don't > think that's necessary. I have already added a Win10 machine to a domain, where only Win7 clients were joined before that. I have managed this domain from Win7 only, so far. Therefore I believe that e.g. the Windows Update policy is not fit for

On 11/16/2015 11:15 AM, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > > > On 16.11.2015 16:54, Ole Traupe wrote: >> Is this your first-and-only DC ever for that domain? >> >> Did you try to re-join the Win clients with deleting the client >> objects after the 'leave'? >> >> Ole >> > > Yes, first and only. As I said, it's more or less a lab setup

On 16.11.2015 14:44, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 16/11/15 13:25, Ole Traupe wrote: >> >> >> Am 16.11.2015 um 14:06 schrieb Viktor Trojanovic: >>> >>> >>> On 16.11.2015 13:48, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>> See replies below >>>> >>>> On 16.11.2015 12:39, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>> On 16/11/15 11:19,

Let me guess. You accessing your server like : \\servername\netlogon of \\servername\sysvol Well thats protected by windows these these days. Try with \\servername.domain.tld\netlogon or \\servername.domain.tld\sysvol Does that work? Yes, There is a whole chaper of this on the list somewhere.. Best is to read howto override this. https://adsecurity.org/?p=1405 and for you

There is nothing wrong with your policies. Test if it all works and if it does, ignore these messages. I having the same message. ( samba 4.2.5 ) Gr. Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Viktor Trojanovic > Verzonden: maandag 16 november 2015 15:54 > Aan: Rowland Penny; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp:

Here are my (little) view regarding shares accesses. I write that to clarify things. And it could really be of-topic as Louis seems to have gave solution. There are 2 levels of authorisation for accessing shares: the share level and FS level. For Sysvol I would keep everyone or replace it by "authenticated users" in paranoid mode as the latter refuse non-authenticated users. They are

Viktor, thanks again! Now that I did this (added the Win10 1511 ADMX files to the central store), I probably will have to recreate the policies that will be applied to Win10 machines, right? Ole On 21.01.2016 17:16, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > Hi Ole, > > I've been using Samba with Win10 clients for a while now, so I'm happy > to share some of my findings. > > See

Hai Victor, Sorry for these, i did not know there was still one going on in the ubuntu package. These are known since 26 july.. What i need/want to know here from which version to which version did you upgrade. I'll fix that in the next update. There where 2 things going on here. - one file moved from package. (apt --fix-broken install) - The othere was due to the changes in ldb with

Is this your first-and-only DC ever for that domain? Did you try to re-join the Win clients with deleting the client objects after the 'leave'? Ole Am 16.11.2015 um 16:26 schrieb Viktor Trojanovic: > > > On 16.11.2015 15:59, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> There is nothing wrong with your policies. >> >> Test if it all works and if it does, ignore these messages.

On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 20:23, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 20:11:02 +0100 > Viktor Trojanovic <viktor at troja.ch> wrote: > > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 19:52, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 19:33:17 +0100 > > > Viktor

On 17/11/15 16:57, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > Hi Mathias, > > Thanks for replying. It seems you're describing the situation on the > AD DC. Computer and user mode access to my DC works fine and without > any issues but I can't access the shares of my *member* server *in > computer mode*. In user mode, it all works just fine. > > Viktor > > On 17.11.2015

I was experiencing problems with Group Policy Objects. The Windows Event Viewer spits out so many different errors, most of them less than helpful, so Iwas seeking help here with some of those messages. In the end, and after many hours and even days of researching this problem, I seem to have pin-pointed the main issue to some simple permission irregularities that I don't know how to

On 29.10.2015 18:49, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/10/15 17:27, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> >> >> On 29.10.2015 17:54, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 29/10/15 16:21, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 27.10.2015 16:16, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>>> On 27/10/15 14:58, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>>>>