similar to: samba-tool domain provision no such option: --slapd-path

Hi list, here is a Samba4 AD with LDB. Is there any limit for number of possible objects? I mean users, computers, and other kind of nodes. On a Samba Wiki page, the doc notes: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/LDB#How_LDB_uses_TDB "How LDB uses TDB LDB basically sits on top of TDB and manipulates the data into an LDAP-like structure." And I've found a doc here:

On 22.08.2016 16:07, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: > * You can set up a second DC (recommended anyway) to have a failover. > Then you don't have to worry if one goes down. By the way, there is no > "PDC" in an AD. All are DCs. i need the users on the linux box in a way like "getent passwd" at the moment on my samba4 there is no user how is part of ad there >

Release Announcements --------------------- These are security releases in order to address the following defects: o CVE-2016-2124: SMB1 client connections can be downgraded to plaintext authentication. https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2016-2124.html o CVE-2020-25717: A user on the domain can become root on domain members.

Release Announcements --------------------- These are security releases in order to address the following defects: o CVE-2016-2124: SMB1 client connections can be downgraded to plaintext authentication. https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2016-2124.html o CVE-2020-25717: A user on the domain can become root on domain members.

I have done the nsswitch config (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_Samba_as_an_AD_Domain_Member#libnss_winbind) wbinfo -u show the users getent passwd doesn't I also run pam-auth-update On 22.08.2016 17:13, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:33:38 +0200 > basti via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On 22.08.2016

Could someone show me differences in both groups and users between a full NT4 LDAP schema and a full ActiveDirectory LDAP schema? Is ActiveDirectory fully retrocompatible with NT4? There are plans for supporting again an OpenLDAP backend when LDAPcon objectives will be achieved? https://ldapcon.org/2019/wp-content/events/presentations/ni_samba_backend.pdf Why an user in old NT4 schema looks like

On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:33:38 +0200 basti via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 22.08.2016 16:07, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote: > > * You can set up a second DC (recommended anyway) to have a > > failover. Then you don't have to worry if one goes down. By the > > way, there is no "PDC" in an AD. All are DCs. > > i need the

Wed, 15 Jul 2020 21:08:44 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On 15/07/2020 20:33, RhineDevil via samba wrote: > > Could someone show me differences in both groups and users between a full NT4 LDAP schema and a full ActiveDirectory LDAP schema? > I could, but we would be here all night, the AD schema is much larger. Just a brief explaination, I need to

I have the problem with rcom 1.2.2 package. It does't work with R 2.2.0. Is there any opportunities to correct the work of this package? Thanks for your help. Yulia

Specs: RedHat 9 Samba V: 3.0.4 Clients: W2K and WinXP Pro smb.conf file: # Global parameters [global] workgroup = aharinc.com netbios name = CHIMERA server string = Chimera- Test PDC encrypt passwords = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n

I had to bypass my unknown sender/recipient domain restrictions to receive list mail and send this. It's hard to say without a whois server for .fi, but it appears that the problem might be with the procontrol.fi. domain. Action to fix the problem is needed ASAP! I've emailed Timo offlist; also tried to get him in IRC. -- Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless

I was trying to follow howto at http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/LDAP_Backend/OpenLDAP with today's source (15 february 2010) (latest commit: 6ec6fa0ac4e71f9b14a3cbfef328d50e321b0544) ./configure --enable-developer worked as well as make && make install. Provision fails: ./setup/provision --realm=unimore.it --ldapadminpass=atmlite --ldap-backend-type=openldap

Following the instructions here ( http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/LDAP_Backend/Fedora_DS_1.2.3), I got to the DS provisioning step and encountered an error trying to provision the 389-DS (v1.2.3 B2009.280.1622). The source was checked out around 12/30/2009 ~16:00 GMT following the instructions provided in the 'howto'. I have made sure that system.domain-test.local is listed in the

I'm trying to install samba4 with openldap, as from http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/LDAP_Backend/OpenLDAP, I have got the yesterday realease, last git commit: commit 2024d4fb27514869d78e9bb39085f98e80413529 Date: Mon Jan 25 12:41:48 2010 +0100 My system is GNU/Debian Linux Lenny. ./configure --prefix=/opt/samba4 make sudo make install all worked ./setup/provision from the source4

Anyone have any idea how soon RHEL and CentOS will be releasing the patch package? Excerpt: Computerworld - Developers of the Apache open-source project today warned users of the popular Web server software that a denial-of-service (DoS) tool is circulating that exploits a bug in the program. The tool, called "Apache Killer," showed up last Friday in a post to the "Full

Wiki seems to be out of date here. The wiki reference's [1] [2] a "setup/provision-backend" script, as well as a "setup/provision" script, yet current git only has a setup/provision executable. Some #samba and #openldap IRC advice was that provision-backend wasnt needed anymore, but based off the errors i'm seeing, there's definitely _something_ missing, I just

On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 09:58 +0200, Ervin Hegedüs via samba wrote: > Hi list, > > here is a Samba4 AD with LDB. > > Is there any limit for number of possible objects? I mean users, computers, > and other kind of nodes. > > On a Samba Wiki page, the doc notes: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/LDB#How_LDB_uses_TDB > > "How LDB uses TDB > > LDB

Hi, I'm running Centos 5, with openldap Version: 2.3.27 Release: 8.el5_2.4. When I run: $ sudo /etc/init.d/ldap start I get the following error: Starting slapd: /bin/bash: /tmp/start-slapd.l14891: Permission denied (obviously the temp file number changes every time). It appears to be a permission problem but I thought I did everything to set up the permissions correctly... Everything

On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Leon Fauster wrote: > Could you provide more context information? > Appliance setup, Dekstop setup, server setup? > There exist a lot scenarios where something > happen automagically? It's a Chimera Desktop 2014. More specifically, I bought the case, the motherboard, the CPU, the RAM and the graphics card from another poster for the price of postage.

On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 3:32 PM Jeff Morris via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > My network uses reserved IPv4 addresses (192.168.2.0/24) behind a NAT > firewall, but public IPv6 addresses behind a filtering firewall. > > My ISP (Comcast) assigns both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses dynamically. > > As a result, the IPv4 address of my internal Samba server is