similar to: Allow unencrypted TLS LDAP query

Good afternoon friends, I am implementing squid + squidguard the pfsense authenticating samba 4 version 4.4.4 And always I get this message in squidguard logs. 2016-06-20 17:30:55 [75446] (squidGuard): ldap_simple_bind_s failed: Strong(er) authentication required 2016-06-20 17:30:55 [75446] Added LDAP source: administrator 2016-06-20 17:30:55 [75446] (squidGuard): ldap_simple_bind_s failed:

Hello Ricardo, Am 18.08.2016 um 22:17 schrieb Ricardo Pardim Claus via samba: > It is possible to configure Samba 4.4.5 to accept queries that do not use TLS? > I'm having trouble authenticating the Proxy / SquidGuard in AD Samba 4.4.5. > > I get this error: > > (squidGuard): ldap_simple_bind_s failed: Strong(er) authentication required > > I read the wiki Samba,

Last night we updated out Samba-4 AD server to version 4.2.14 usng the SERNEt packages, running on SLES 12. We have a number of services (mail services, MANTIS, etc) that access the server via the LDAP interface and in all cases we discovered that none of them where able to establish a successful LDAP connection after the upgrade.   Previously we used plain LDAP to access the server, i.e. we did

Hello Alan, Am 08.07.2016 um 13:37 schrieb Alan Hughes: > Last night we updated out Samba-4 AD server to version 4.2.14 > usng the SERNEt packages, running on SLES 12. Always check the release notes for new versions - including the ones you're skipping. This one contains the information you're looking for: https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.2.10.html And here in less

Dear, I have three installations of Samba 4, version 4.4.5. Being two DC's and a file server (domain member). I would like to update Samba to the latest version. The current installation was done by compiling the Samba packages. Could someone tell me if I can upgrade directly to the latest version available? Should I compile the new package to overlap the previous version? Thank you!

Le 30/09/2019 ? 17:53, Gwaland a ?crit?: > looks like it was updated due to a segfault. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750550 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253662 Now I'm even more puzzled. Fedora and EPEL sport SquidGuard 1.4.36. Now when you search for "squidguard", this seems to be the project site: * http://squidguard.org/index.html

Hi all, I have created a squid class that also installs squidGuard. When I run puppetd I always get notice: //Node[xxxx.xxxxxx.xxx]/squid/squid::install/ Package[squidGuard]/ensure: ensure changed ''purged'' to ''present'' even though the package is already installed - why is this change in package status happening as it then triggers my exec resource which is

Hi list, Has anyone here use SquidGuard for their Squid proxy running in CentOS4.4 to block list of bad sites? Is the RPM available using yum? Any feedback using this software appreciated. Thank you very much. junji linux registered user #253162 Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

On Mon, 30 Sep, 2019 at 23:47:02 -0700, John Pierce wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:26 PM Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > > > Le 30/09/2019 ? 17:53, Gwaland a ?crit : > > > looks like it was updated due to a segfault. > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750550 > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253662

Hi, The SquidGuard URL redirector has recently been updated in EPEL, and I'm a bit puzzled. I'm still using SquidGuard on a few local proxy servers running CentOS 7, because it's a nifty piece of software for filtering web traffic. The project's home page has remained unchanged for more than ten years: * http://www.squidguard.org/ It looks like the project has been dormant or

Hi it's possible with wbinfo that get a information: 1- Get all users of one Active Directory Group 2- Get all groups of one username ? (i want create a small perl script for add automatiquely user into Squidguard, other user say me that Squidguard can't directly get the Active DIrectory Group (only use username) Thanks for your help

Hi, I´m have a Samba 4 Domain Member that I use like a Proxy Server. I use Squid with NTLM Athentication and work perfecly. My problem is Squidguard with NTLM Authentication. If I use Samba 4.2.X in my Samba 4 Domain Controler I watch in Squid LOG only the user name but If I use Samba 4.1.x or 4.3.0 in my Domain Controler I watch in Squid LOG domain\\user name and Squidguard Authentication not

Hi, I''m trying to get Shorewall to work with Squidguard on a machine which is acting as the fileserver, firewall, proxy server and internet access point for a small network. The network at present consists of the fileserver/firewall machine running RH 8.0, two Linux boxes running various RH distributions and two windows virtual machines running on the other machines under Win4Lin.

Hi! I need some help. We use samba4 as AD, and now when clients connect to server, samba process stuck at 100% cpu. samba Version: 4.3.4 Release: 13.el6 top: 3777 root 20 0 131m 46m 28m R 99.7 0.3 219:20.53 /usr/local/samba4//sbin/samba -D 24541 csertam 20 0 49260 11m 9048 S 25.1 0.1 0:01.56 smbd -D 7080 squid 20 0 926m 908m 6428 S 9.9 6.2 11:43.50

Hi, I've been working with Squid + SquidGuard for a few years, though only on Slackware. I'm currently transferring my proxy expertise to CentOS 7, and right now I'm having a little problem with that. Squid works perfectly so far as a transparent HTTP + HTTPS cache proxy. The next step is to add SquidGuard, so I installed it and edited the most basic /etc/squid/squidGuard.conf file

hi all, curious is anyone has successfully sent http get packets to userspace for blacklist filtering ... i''d like to do a live cd that would obviate the neccessity to install squid and squidguard, but rather, have iptables send packets to squidguard (or something else) directly ... cheers charles

In article <dafd6c5f-9676-c4da-8761-619d6f003525 at microlinux.fr>, Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > Le 01/10/2019 ?? 09:05, Liam O'Toole a ??crit??: > > [...] > > > > FWIW, the current release has squidguard 1.6 > > https://packages.debian.org/source/stable/squidguard > > And this all begs the question: who's flying this plane?

Dear,The FAQ Samba 4 states that it is not compatible with Windows Server 2012, as the link below: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Windows_Server_2012_/_2012_R2_DC_to_a_Samba_AD My question is, is incompatible with the Server 2012 or the functional level of 2012?Here we have a Windows Server 2012 R2 with AD level of Windows 2008 R2 functionality.Samba 4 is compatible with this

On 19/10/15 16:46, mathias dufresne wrote: > AD from Samba or Microsoft is mainly a database for storing users (and > associated stuffs). It comes also with stuffs (protocols) to connect and > retrieve information. > > How the client uses these information is, as always, a choice from that > specific client. > > Your AD client is your Squid/Squidguard(ian) server. Its job

Le 29/09/2019 ? 18:48, Stephen John Smoogen a ?crit?: > Is there a problem with the version which is in EPEL? No, there isn't. I was just puzzled that there was an update to an application that's been manifestly dormant for more than ten years. -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Mail : info at