similar to: File Server recognize users and groups AD

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "File Server recognize users and groups AD"

2016 Oct 21
5
Problem Groups GID Mappings
Dear, I have 2 DC's Samba4.4.5. I realize that there is a difference in mapping groups gid mappings. The /etc/nsswitch.conf are equal in DC's. I found difference in the smb.conf of DC's. The DC2 shows the name of winbind groups. The DC1 shows only the uid of the group / user. Could someone give me a hint? Smb.conf file DC1 [global] interfaces = lo eth0 netbios name = SRV14
2016 Aug 10
1
File Server member DC ACL permissions
I will choose to use the winbind. Based on the link that Rowland said: https://wiki.samba.org /index.php/Setup_Samba_as_an_AD_Domain_Member I followed the steps as described in the tutorial. I created symlinks. In the main DC I added this line in smb.conf: idmap_ldb: use RFC2307 = yes Changed /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: files winbind shadow: files group: files winbind hosts:
2016 Aug 10
1
File Server member DC ACL permissions
Greetings, Previously I had set up a file server with DC on the same machine. As recommendations, created another machine to be the file server. I made the settings as far as I could do, but I can not give permissions on shared folders. Must give permissions on shared folders for groups and users of the domain. I'm using Samba 4.4.5 in DC's and also the file server. I joined the file
2016 Oct 05
3
Failure gpupdate
Yes, I performed tests on both DC's. 2 DC's working normally. The sysvolreset works in both DC's after I disabled full_audit. The gpupdate / force works perfectly. And also through the RSAT, I do not get more permission error when I edit any GPO. If this is a bug, who can inform / report? What I find strange in DC's, is when I view the sysvol permissions. The DC2 appears the
2016 Aug 11
1
File Server member DC ACL permissions
Dear Rowland, This Samba 4 domain was not provisioned from scratch. Here in the company we had a DC Windows 2008. The Samba was provided to secondary DC. Then, the primary DC remains Windows, but will be removed this weekend. Samba DC will be the primary DC. In the file server file krb5.conf, I informed the KDC servers pointing to the Samba DC. Follows the smb.conf my DC Samba 4: # Global
2016 Oct 05
3
Failure gpupdate
Dear James and Lingpanda Here I have 2 DC's running. Everything was running perfectly. The problem started after I started to rsync to synchronize the Sysvol folder between DC's. I believe it is a permission problem in the GPO's or Sysvol folder. Another detail. Even accessing the gpedit Group Polic Manager via RSAT using the Administrator User, I can no longer edit any GPO. I get
2014 Feb 08
1
Samba 3 to 4 AD migration - extensive permissions problems
Finally biting the bullet and upgrading home machines to Windows 7 but experiencing many problems. Server is a Debian Lenny, old Samba 3.2.5, new Samba 4.1.4 built from source. My setup has been doing roaming profiles for XP since 2003 or so with almost no changes. I want to keep roaming profiles going plus do some folder redirection (Desktop (my wife doesn't believe in file shares for
2016 Aug 15
2
Problems with Secondary DC
Problems with Secondary DC My scenario: DC1 = = SRV14=primary DC + DHCP Bind9 DC2 = SRV15=secondary DC + Bind9 Both running Samba 4.4.5. Through the Group Policy Management, when switching DC, when I try to connect to DC2, I get error message: "There was an error processing to collect data using this base domain controller. Change the base domain controller and try again." When
2005 Oct 11
1
User auth-groups vs Win2k ADS Problems
Hello Everyone This samba server was working perfectly without problems. Running as an Domain member vs Win2K ADS One day it stopped working. All that happened 5 days ago was a change of the administrator/root password We adjusted the wbinfo -set-auth-user towards the new password. But nothing have worked since. install:/ # wbinfo -V Version 3.0.13-1.1-SUSE What might be wrong
2015 Jul 03
3
Clients unable to get group policy...
On 03/07/15 15:18, Ryan Ashley wrote: > The only Unix client I can think of would be the Buffalo NAS. It runs > Samba3 and hosts various shares via SMB. DNS is handled by BIND9 on the > Samba4 DC. DNS does work and the domain name resolves to the IP address > of the server. DHCP is also handled on the DC. As for the GPO's, they're > in the correct place as far as I can tell.
2015 Jul 03
2
Clients unable to get group policy...
On 03/07/15 15:58, Ryan Ashley wrote: > They left a PC on, so I got the info. The info pissed me off, but not > because of the issue. This time it worked flawlessly, but I got the > error from the event log from prior attempts. First, today's results. > > C:\Users\reachfp.KIGM>gpupdate > Updating Policy... > > User Policy update has completed successfully. >
2007 Aug 06
1
setfacl(1) - Can FreeBSD's ACLs contain groups from NT/AD domains ?
Hi all, I have "FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #1: Wed Jul 25" authenticating successfully against active directory via samba's winbindd(8). I need to manage samba shares via FreeBSD ACLs and CIFS ACLs. From my reading of setfacl(1) I should be able to set group permissions using the syntax of DOMAIN\group-name. For example: #setfacl -d -m g:"MYDOMAIN\mygroupname":rwx test
2015 Jun 30
2
Clients unable to get group policy...
On 30/06/15 17:18, Ryan Ashley wrote: > I hate to revive this, but before I push my client through an upgrade, I > have to be sure my issue is with ACLs not being supported, as suggested. > Squeeze does have ACL support. > > root at dc01:/samba/var/locks# getfacl sysvol > # file: sysvol > # owner: root > # group: 3000000 > user::rwx > user:root:rwx >
2007 Sep 20
2
acl permissions not staying
Hi guys, I've got a problem where if I set permissions on a folder(Admin) "setfacl -R -d -m u::rwx,g::wrx,o::- Admin/" and "setfacl -m o:- Admin" I get the following. mail:/data/samba/shared # getfacl Admin/ # file: Admin # owner: BCP+administrator # group: samba user::rwx user:samba:rwx group::rwx group:BCP+admin:r-x mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx
2015 Jul 02
5
Clients unable to get group policy...
On 02/07/15 16:55, Ryan Ashley wrote: > Rowland, here is what I found in the ldb. > > # record 68 > dn: CN=S-1-5-32-544 > cn: S-1-5-32-544 > objectClass: sidMap > objectSid: S-1-5-32-544 > type: ID_TYPE_BOTH > xidNumber: 3000000 > distinguishedName: CN=S-1-5-32-544 > > # record 70 > dn: CN=S-1-5-32-549 > cn: S-1-5-32-549 > objectClass: sidMap >
2015 May 27
1
Samba4 Disable USB ports
Good Morning Achim, Follows the exit of the requested command. Now the GPO funny not work when user is only the ?Domain Users? getfacl /var/lib/samba/sysvol/ getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: var/lib/samba/sysvol/ # owner: root # group: 3000000 user::rwx user:root:rwx user:3000000:rwx user:3000003:r-x group::rwx group:3000000:rwx group:3000001:rwx
2016 Aug 11
3
File Server member DC ACL permissions
> Hmm, the numbers seem extremely large, did you set this number in the > users 'uidnumber' attribute in AD ? How do I do this uidNumber configuration? I'm running all services: smbd, nmbd and winbind It's hard to run the file server as a domain member. When was a file server with DC was much more easy.
2018 Nov 06
3
classicupgrade
Hello Luis tomorrow i'm not in office, reply to you thursday One question : who is owner and whats rights for dir     /home     /home/samba     /home/samba/sysvol because, from windows client, user into domain admins, when i change in security tab, explorer always crash bye Il 06/11/2018 17:16, L.P.H. van Belle via samba ha scritto: > Ok, next, > > From a windows pc connect to
2013 Mar 03
1
Samba4 as domain member and file server
Hi guys, I'm having trouble setting up my file server running Samba 4 (4.0.3). I had no problem joining the domain (also a Samba 4 (4.0.3) with AD) but I can't get the ACL to work properly. I'm sure my settings are wrong and hoping for some help. When I try to set a user permission I get this error: setfacl -m u:administrator:rwx test3.txt setfacl: test3.txt: Malformed access ACL
2018 Jul 05
2
NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY accessing a DC shared resource
> Your glasses (or lack of) ;-) I usually agree, but in this case I've seen that warning and voluntarily ignored it because it worked for 2 days... I thought I was lucky ;-) > Or to put it another way, you must set the permissions from Windows > > This is one of the problems/features of using a DC as a fileserver. > > Remove everything after the 'read only = No'