similar to: Samba 4.2.14 Group Policy (GPO) sync error

The server expects TLS but you didnt set tls. Read : https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.2.10.html basicly its now : Default: ldap server require strong auth = yes You can try to add: ldap server require strong auth = no But i do advice to setup the TLS parameters and make everything more secure. Please read these links, MS change some things in GPO also. MS16-072: Security

I tried the version 4.2.11 and will not let me access the DNS via RSAT, I changed several permissions in several ways and does not allow me access will be a bug? if i try to browse dns from a windows2003 dns management utility in log.samba i got the following message: [2016/04/16 09:39:45.296046, 2] ../source4/rpc_server/dcerpc_server.c:1275(dcesrv_request) dcesrv_request: restrict

Hello Louis, Thanks for your reply. > No, your output is not good. So let's have a look. > >C:\Temp>netdom verify cyb64w10-monster > >The format of the specified computer name is invalid. > Thats not good. Well, it quite clearly states the format is invalid. If I use the the FQDN of the AD domain it works fine. The DNS search is also including the AD domain as

  Can you run on a failing computer : - netdom verify yourpcname - nslookup yourpcname All ok? And is time in sync?   Did you install winbind after the update and also and did you change you server services line?   Like, i use bind9 dns My smb.conf contains only this :        server services = -dns   The full line is :  samba-tool testparm -vv | grep "server service"

Forgot one extra. On the win 10, check this reg key. HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\Hostname It states you hostname here, but if its not in caps change it to HOSTNAME In that register key. (HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters) You should see also you dnsdomain at Domain and NV Domain. NV Hostname should be in CAPS also. The domains not.

Hi Louis, Many many thanks for your very quick and comprehensive reply. I also found this thread here <https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-July/201471.html> Unfortunately none of the suggestions seem to entirely resolve the issue. As a first work-around I have inserted ldap server require strong auth = no to my smb.conf and re-started Samba. Unfortunately this didn't

I tried the version 4.2.11 and will not let me access the DNS via RSAT, I changed several permissions in several ways and does not allow me access will be a bug? if i try to browse dns from a windows2003 dns management utility in log.samba i got the following message: [2016/04/16 09:39:45.296046, 2] ../source4/rpc_server/dcerpc_server.c:1275(dcesrv_request) dcesrv_request: restrict

>I actually also thought Windows does not care > about > case sensitivity and for hostnames by default it shouldn't matter. Thats correct but if windows is buggy.. Source : https://support.microsoft.com/nl-nl/kb/2891966 It was worth a try.. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2954031 for the status rapport error, one you can check also. I see still something incorrect

> Can you run on a failing computer : > - netdom verify yourpcname It seems to work only with FQDN: C:\Temp>netdom verify cyb64w10-monster The format of the specified computer name is invalid. The command failed to complete successfully. C:\Temp>netdom verify cyb64w10-monster.ad.cyberdyne.local The secure channel from CYB64W10-MONSTER.AD.CYBERDYNE.LOCAL to the domain CYBERDYNE

Hi all, Since I have upgraded to Samba 4.2.11 I got errors when updating group policy objects (GPO) on my clients (all Windows 7 Professional). When running "gpupdate" from the command line on Windows 7 Pro Domain-Joined clients it states not to be able to resolve the domain controller. According to what I see from the logs it looks like it's related to resolving accounts. I am

Hai, No, your output is not good. >C:\Temp>netdom verify cyb64w10-monster >The format of the specified computer name is invalid. Thats not good. > C:\Temp>nslookup cyb64w10-monster > Server: UnKnown > Address: fdea:5b48:d4c1:1:1::6 Also not good. If you resolving is setup correct both should work. netdom verify cyb64w10-monster and netdom verify

On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 12:02:18 +0200 rme at bluemail.ch wrote: > > Well, I am using IPv6 mainly for all services and don't want to > > disable it. Though I might try this temporary which will be quite a > > bunch of reconfiguration to disable IPv6 in all services. So I will > > come back with results on this later. > > I have completely disabled IPv6 on the server

Hi, I have a test system consisting of two samba 4.7.5 DCs and a member server based on Gentoo 4.9.76-gentoo-r1. Both servers using SAMBA_INTERNAL dns. When I added the second DC to the domain, the join went OK with no errors reported, but the log shows errors relating to dns updates and the SRV records etc for the new DC have not been created. Running samba_dnsupdate on the new DC results in

I am also seeing this in smbd.log: [2020/07/03 09:20:18.211558, 1] ../../auth/kerberos/gssapi_helper.c:391(gssapi_check_packet) GSS VerifyMic failed: A token had an invalid MIC: unknown mech-code 2529638943 for mech 1 2 840 113554 1 2 2 [2020/07/03 09:20:18.211625, 0] ../../source4/auth/gensec/gensec_gssapi.c:1347(gensec_gssapi_check_packet)

Dear All, I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found that GPO are having issue Specifically when I'm adding new using they *never *got the gpupdate success fully. When I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck or samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset But don't seem to got it fix.. Any suggestion? Thank in advance. #samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck Processing section

Hai, ? im running samba 4.2.2 sernet on debian. ? when i run : samba-tool gpo aclcheck -UAdministrator ? im getting : ERROR: Invalid GPO ACL O:DAG:DAD:PAI(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED) and it tells me it should be O:DAG:DAD:P?

On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 4:24 PM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Yes, that is what it is designed for. Yes, and yes it does! Thank you!!

Hi, First of all thanks for you answer, it seems that this can help, now some change made to gpo are applied and we are not receiving error in event viewer, but seem that some change are not applied, why and where I can find some information, in samba log anv event viewer any error is reported Also I have tried # samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset After this tried # samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck

G'day Guys, We are running Centos 6.4, samba4.0.10, compiled from tgz. Has anyone come up with this one before? samba-tool gpo aclcheck ERROR(<type 'exceptions.KeyError'>): uncaught exception - 'No such element' File "/usr/local/samba/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 175, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs) File

Am 2017-05-23 um 20:16 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> Can I reset that somehow manually? > > If you are adding GPOs, then yes, by never running sysvolreset. I only did that after sysvolcheck failed! And I still get these problems in the GPO-management. I translate via googling: "A processing error occurred collecting data using this base domain controller." this one ?