similar to: null session and "restrict anonymous" default value on samba4 AD

Oh I think I must of misread what you and steve where discussing. What is confusing me is the output of samba-tool domain level show Forest function level: (Windows) 2003 Domain function level: (Windows) 2003 Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2008 R2 I thought it might of been because rfc2307 schema included was of 2008r2 ilk. Why does it always say the lowest function level is

I'm Takano. Now, a system such as the following by cooperation with the Samba and Windows ActiveDirectory We would like to build. ☆Samba OS：CentOS7 Samba：(ver4.4.5) ☆Windows(ActiveDirectory) OS：Windows Server 2003 ※State functional level is raised from 2000 to 2003. That you want to achieve it will be following. ・Create a domain controller (samba.test) on the Samba server side. ・And set

On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 11:42:07 -0400 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 12:25:14 +0100 Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> > wrote: > > > > This will then prompt the user for their 'oldpassword' and then the > > new password (twice). There is a gotcha though, as given it will > > only work on a DC, to do the

@Phil nice text... just want to mention (or better ask...) what the difference between a protocol which implements multiple connections simultaneously and a protocol implementing multiple connections by connection tracking? In the end... its the same... On 04.05.2016 10:25, Philipp Schafft wrote: > Good morning, > > On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 00:15 +0200, Fran Delgado wrote: >> Hi,

Hi, I am running 2.2.5 and I would like to know if the "restrict anonymous" as been implemented correctly, as it was supposed to behave from the start, in order to deny ALL anonymous connections as stated in the man : "When restrict anonymous is yes, all anonymous connections are denied no matter what they are for." Ive been reading some dev mailing lists and someone said

Dear, I have 2 DC's Samba4.4.5. I realize that there is a difference in mapping groups gid mappings. The /etc/nsswitch.conf are equal in DC's. I found difference in the smb.conf of DC's. The DC2 shows the name of winbind groups. The DC1 shows only the uid of the group / user. Could someone give me a hint? Smb.conf file DC1 [global] interfaces = lo eth0 netbios name = SRV14

Hi Dirk, Le 11/03/2017 à 05:07 PM, Dirk Laurenz a écrit : > Nope, but that was not the problem... > > > root at samba01:~# dpkg -l | grep python-dns > root at samba01:~# apt-get install python-dns ouch, my fault, I think it should have been python-dnspython By the way, what samba package are you using? python-dnspython should be a dependency of samba package (at least it is in

Hi Harsh, > Thanks for your response without your crystal ball. > > I have increased the log level =9 dns:0 on both the servers. It > replicates successfully by manually running the command > samba-tool drs replicate SERVER2 SERVER1 dc=iumnet,dc=edu,dc=na --full-sync --full-sync copy the whole partition and may hide problems. If there is a corrupted entry in it, I guess it may

Hi Harsh, > > Thanks for your advise I will not use these wordings here. thanks! > Please check the result below when I run the command on the DC-1 when > DC-2 is off or on > smbclient -k //IUMSVRAPP01/Pastel12 -d 9 > ... > session setup failed: NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER_MIX Looking at this message, I would start with doing some cleanup in your smb.conf. I would trim

I was already aware if this in the first place :-) On 04.05.2016 18:04, Jordan Erickson wrote: > Hi buddylove, > > In addition to the links Philipp provided you, here is some more reading > which will hopefully help you better understand the difference between > multicast and unicast communications: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicast >

On Tue, 03 Apr 2018 23:34:13 -0400 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 17:04:22 +0100 Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> > wrote: > > > > On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 11:42:07 -0400 > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 12:25:14 +0100 Rowland Penny > >

Hi Harsh, > Thanks for the suggestion to trim the smb.conf after which the DC-1 is > connecting to the Windows Server 2008 shared folder smbclient -k > //IUMSVRAPP01/Pastel12 -d 9 > and DC-2 is also connecting after using the DNS name of the Windows server. > > *You'd better switch your DNS to Bind-DLZ. Internal DNS is not that good > for larger site (looking at your DNS

Hi Jordi, How is it going up there in Normandie? > I have seen in an old post that you have tested new KCC from full mesh to bridge head at a french school. > Is your "drs showrepl" correct on such DC's ? > > In my case, a drs showrepl is showing a full mesh on inbound and outbound (not good) but only 1 KCC connection objects (good) > Where is a full description of

Hi Jules, > I am trying to deploy Samba4 as a domain controller and a file server and > having some issues.* > > The domain have been well provisioned with option --use-rfc2307 > > I am then trying to create share by following this samba wiki > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Shares_with_Windows_ACLs > > The problem is that i cannot succeed to change the group owner of

Hi Vincent, > I started using Samba as an AD DC on el7 a few weeks ago. I have some > questions for others who mights also be using Wing's rpms on el7 > (http://wing-net.ddo.jp/wing). > > A) Is there a wiki/issues page for that repo? I could not find any.. > > B) is that the only repo of samba rpms available for el7/centos7? You can use the RPM at https://samba.plus from

mmm Very interesting. and...if i have 3 DCS and i change the passwords in principal but, the audit is in other DC, I suppose that by replicating the change in the other DCS the auditor will work, right? El mié., 26 sept. 2018 a las 13:54, Denis Cardon (<dcardon at tranquil.it>) escribió: > Hi > > > Good morning people from Argentine. > > > > again bothering with a

We installed Samba4. Thanks Sent with Good Work (www.good.com) From: Denis Cardon <denis.cardon at tranquil-it-systems.fr<mailto:denis.cardon at tranquil-it-systems.fr>> Date: Friday, Sep 02, 2016, 13:57 To: Ron Short <short at sgi.com<mailto:short at sgi.com>>, samba at lists.samba.org <samba at lists.samba.org<mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>> Subject: Re:

Hi LingPanda101, > Is it possible to filter DNS queries for specific TLD's using the > internal logging system? My IPS/IDS alerts me when a suspicious TLD is > being queried. However I'm only able to see the DC as the source. Thanks. > > Ubuntu 14.04 Samba 4.7.3. First you should really upgrade to 4.7.4 (see recent changelog) Second, if you are not using Bind DLZ,

Hi Massimo, >>> Hi to All, >>> i'm wondering to do again domain provision. >>> anyone that tryed this? >>> any idea on how to have the previous users profiles imported in the >>> new domain ? >>> do i have to rejoin all the workstations? >> If you provision Samba, you will get a NEW domain. Whilst you can dump >> the users etc

Hi Frederik, > I provisioned a new domain with "--use-rfc2307" as I want to use the > "ad" idmap backend on my domain members. unless you have really specific requirements, you should really stick with RID mapping, it will be easier on the long run. > I am thinking of mapping the "Administrator" account to UID 10000 > (this is where my UID range for