similar to: NT4-Style Auth & Roaming Profiles Only?

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 16:09:10 +0100 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 26/07/16 15:31, Jim Seymour wrote: > > Hi There, > > > > Tried a Samba AD. Didn't work out. Please do not suggest. > > Thanks! > > Why didn't Samba AD work, what problems did you have, it might be > easier to fix them. It's a long and ugly story, which

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 17:40:47 +0100 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: [snip] > > I remember it now, it started last September ( see here: > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-September/194047.html) and > it could have been the longest running thread on here and you still > couldn't get it to work. More accurately: Couldn't get it to work the way

Ok try set the profiles folder on 777 And add : valid users = %u @"Domain Administrators" greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Jim Seymour > Verzonden: dinsdag 26 juli 2016 16:32 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] NT4-Style Auth & Roaming Profiles Only? > > Hi

On 7/27/2016 12:18 PM, Jim Seymour wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 13:40:59 -0500 > Dale Schroeder <dale at BriannasSaladDressing.com> wrote: > > [snip] >> Sorry Rowland, but the break happened before the badlock patches when >> Debian jumped from 4.1.x to 4.3.x, skipping 4.2.x altogether. > [snip] >> Jim, currently at Debian 4.4.5. If you search this list, you

Hi There, We have this rather large-ish floor-standing Best Axxium Pro, Model Series 0650. I tried using both the "bestups" and "blazer_ser" drivers with it, but no go. So before I go any further: *Should* one of these work with it and, if not, do I have any options? (E.g.: Modify a current driver, resuscitate one that was started and abandoned, etc.? I can code.) My test

On 07/26/2016 1:26 PM, Rowland penny wrote: > On 26/07/16 19:08, Jim Seymour wrote: >> On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 12:37:51 -0500 >> Dale Schroeder <dale at BriannasSaladDressing.com> wrote: >> >> [snip] >>> Jim, >>> >>> This may be your problem: Samba 4.3.9 >>> >>> Upgrading my NT4 domain from 4.2.x to 4.3.x and beyond broke

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 23:03:39 -0400 Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > On 08/27/2015 08:45 PM, Jim Seymour wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:00:28 -0400 > > Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > > >> Ah, LDAP is included within Samba, I find. Don't install provided > >> one... [snip] > > >

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 12:37:51 -0500 Dale Schroeder <dale at BriannasSaladDressing.com> wrote: [snip] > > Jim, > > This may be your problem: Samba 4.3.9 > > Upgrading my NT4 domain from 4.2.x to 4.3.x and beyond broke it, and > no combination of configuration parameters could put it back together > again. > > I wish you better luck. Yikes! Thanks for

Hi All, Well, after going in something of the Wrong Direction, I figure on starting over. Now: Looking at the docs, ISTM that BIND_DLZ is kind of a PITA. So, being as I need the BIND (server also is the nameserver for the entire LAN), and the recommendation is to put the AD PDC in a sub-domain, anyway, I was thinking: Run BIND as normal, but bind it to only eth0 Set up an eth0:0

NOTE: Please honour the "Reply-To" and do not "Reply-All". I'm reading the mailing list. I wouldn't be posting to it if I was not and I don't need two copies. Thanks! On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:32:33 -0400 Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > [snip] > > Oops. I missed that you had missed this! When you said flat zone > file, I took

On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:19:22 -0400 Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > On 09/08/2015 09:04 AM, Jim Seymour wrote: > [snip] > > > > And the zone file on deepthought might read something like... > > > > somepc IN A 192.168.0.10 [snip] > > Problem with the AD DC is that it lives in a sub-domain, > >

On 08/27/2015 04:18 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hello Jim, > > Am 27.08.2015 um 21:49 schrieb Jim Seymour: >> BIND would be the auth nameserver for example.com and delegate >> the samdom.example.com zone to the Samba DNS running on the second >> (virtual) interface >> >> Samba is the auth nameserver for samdom.example.com > If

Hi All, I should have considered this beforehand... Assumed the info would be in the Wiki somewhere. Cannot find. The way our LAN has been working is clients use DHCP, but all address assignments are static. Thus, when a given PC asks "what's my address?", the DHCP server looks at the MAC address and asks the configured resolver what is the IP address for the hostname for that

Hi All, Finally got BIND_DLZ going. Last errors were: samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone 'example.com' loading configuration: already exists exiting (due to fatal error) samba_dlz: shutting down And, indeed, I had, in /etc/bind/named.local.conf: zone "example.com" in { type master; file "named.hosts"; }; Commenting that out

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:18:21 +0100 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/09/15 15:57, Jim Seymour wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 15:07:37 +0100 > > Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > [snip] > >> The kerberos default_realm must be the samba AD DC domain name and > >> usually > > So if

On 08/27/2015 04:52 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/08/15 21:42, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >> On 08/27/2015 04:37 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 27/08/15 21:23, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 08/27/2015 04:18 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: >>>>> Hello Jim, >>>>> >>>>> Am

Hi Current wiki suggestion (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_BIND_as_backend_for_Samba_AD#Interaction_with_AppArmor_or_SELinux) is to add the following to /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.named # Samba4 DLZ and Active Directory Zones (default source installation) /usr/local/samba/lib/** rm, /usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab r, /usr/local/samba/private/named.conf r,

Hi All, So I tried to upgrade to 2.5.2p2 today. Got this when I stopped/started sshd: Disabling protocol version 2. Could not load host key Re-installed 2.3.0p1 and all was well again. This look familiar to anybody? Thanks, Jim -- Jim Seymour | PGP Public Key available at: jseymour at jimsun.LinxNet.com | http://www.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/pks-commands.html

On 07/26/2016 9:31 AM, Jim Seymour wrote: > Hi There, > > Tried a Samba AD. Didn't work out. Please do not suggest. Thanks! > > Here's what we have: > > Ubuntu Linux 14.04.4 LTS > Samba 4.3.9-Ubuntu > > Using OpenLDAP for authentication > Using nscd to speed things up > > *Not* running winbind > *Not* running

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 15:07:37 +0100 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote: [snip] > > The kerberos default_realm must be the samba AD DC domain name and > usually So if I put the Samba AD DC in, say, "addc.example.com," "addc.example.com" must be the Kerberos default_realm? > the samba DNS server (internal or bind) is just the dns >