similar to: Samba 4.2.14 GPO issue

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Samba 4.2.14 GPO issue"

2016 Jul 24
3
Samba 4.2.14 GPO issue
Hello Sébastien Le Ray, The PC reply the following... The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the user name. This could be caused by one or more of the following: a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain controller. b) Active Directory Replication Latency (an account created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller). The
2016 Aug 03
1
Samba 4.2.14 GPO issue
Dear Sébastien, Sorry for the delay, Please check on the log below. As for the word "存取被拒。" it should translate to Access Deny... Please help. - <Event xmlns="*http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event <http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event>*"> - <System> <Provider Name="*Microsoft-Windows-GroupPolicy*"
2013 Oct 09
2
GPO Permissions _AGAIN_
Hi all, I'm afraid I'm back to my old issue of GPO permissions. I have two ADDCs providing an AD Domain (internal.stmaryscollege.co.uk (short-name 'SMC')). Servers are called 'ad-01' and 'tainan'. ad-01 is 'Version 4.0.10' and tainan is 'Version 4.1.0rc4' (the latest version in the package repos of the respective OSs (arch and gentoo)) I have
2016 Jul 21
3
gpo not working with samba 4 migrated
Hi, First of all thanks for you answer, it seems that this can help, now some change made to gpo are applied and we are not receiving error in event viewer, but seem that some change are not applied, why and where I can find some information, in samba log anv event viewer any error is reported Also I have tried # samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset After this tried # samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
2017 Sep 04
2
BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
Hello everyone. I'm trying to fix sysvol rights, because i see errors in output of /usr/bin/samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory /var/lib/samba/sysvol/samdom.svmetal.cz/Policies/{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}
2017 Aug 24
4
sysvolreset doesn't reset all ACLs
> root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba --version > Version 4.5.8-Debian > root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset && echo "no error" > no error > root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck > ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory
2020 Oct 25
2
GPO fail and sysvol perm errors
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 3:31 PM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > OK, if you look at the end of the permissions, there is a '+' sign, this > shows that extended acls set, to see these: > > getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol The difference in acls is that the non-working domain includes: user:3000001:r-x user:3000002:rwx user:3000003:r-x
2016 Jul 22
2
gpo not working with samba 4 migrated
On 21/07/16 22:18, Trenta sis wrote: > I'm not sure what are you deatiling, is a bug in progress taht can cause > this random problems with some gpos or this error can be ignored? > > 2016-07-21 20:37 GMT+02:00 Trenta sis <trenta.sis at gmail.com>: > >> Hi, >> >> First of all thanks for you answer, it seems that this can help, now some >> change
2015 Dec 28
3
Wrong ACL on GPO
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I use Samba 4.3.3 and Rowland it dosn't metter if I build it by my self or install tehe SerNet-Packages ;-) Everytime I craete a new GPO or change something in an existing GPO, the test with "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" fails with the following Error: - ---------------- ERROR(<class
2015 Oct 02
3
sysvol acl's broken beyond repair
Hi everyone. I ran into notorios gpo error on windows clients. When I go to my dc controller and run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck I get an error: ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/tsnr.mtt/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}
2020 Oct 25
2
GPO fail and sysvol perm errors
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 4:02 PM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > What do you mean by 'working domain' and 'non-working domain' ? > Do you have two domains ? Different sites, different companies, not related. The working one was also a classic upgrade but earlier on, pre 4.6.x. Just using it to compare. > I am also trying to understand why
2014 May 13
1
GPO problems on a 4.1.6 AD, classicupgraded, uncaught exception
Hi all, We'er running a classicupgraded samba4 AD 4.1.6 sernet for a month or two now, and all is very well. :-) It has been classicupgraded using the same 4.1.6. Today I wanted to try GPO's and they are not applied. GPUpdate /force tells me: "Windows attempted to read the file blahblah\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful". Taken from the mailinglist, I
2015 Jun 12
1
samba 4.1.13 not applying domain policy in windows XP clients
Hello, i configured group policy via RSAT in my samba 4.1.13 implementation the policy applies correctly to my windows 7 clients but not to my windows XP clients. when i run gpupdate /force in windows XP it replies that the policies are apply correctly .... when i run ./samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception -
2015 Nov 16
2
Win Clients and DNS
So I ran a samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck, and the following error message came up: --------------------snip-------------------- ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory /var/lib/samba/sysvol/samdom.com/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/MACHINE/Scripts/Startup
2016 Nov 26
2
Everyone ACL problem
Hello list, I have problems with my PDC Samba Servers and all file servers. All DC Server have a compiled Samba 4.4.5. File servers have Samba Debian packages. In all shared folders, the ACL has the group "Everyone" and I can't remove it. The biggest problem concern SYSVOL, I can't modify GPO, I have an error in MMC. I have tried to resolv the problem with the
2017 Apr 25
1
"This security ID may not be assigned as the owner of this object" when trying to create a GPO
I have upgraded Samba from a NT PDC to an AD DC about a week ago. Everything went pretty well until today. I've already configured about 25 GPO's (through RSAT on a Windows 10 machine) - but when I came to add more GPO's - it wouldn't let me with the above error message. My specs are: Samba 4.5.0 Slackware -current 64bit Kernel 4.4.20 The client machine is a Windows 10 Pro.
2015 Nov 16
3
Win Clients and DNS
See replies below On 16.11.2015 12:39, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 16/11/15 11:19, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> So I ran a samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck, and the following error >> message came up: >> >> --------------------snip-------------------- >> ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught >> exception - ProvisioningError:
2015 Dec 28
2
Wrong ACL on GPO
On 28/12/15 10:07, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Hai Stefan, > > If you look from within windows, are you sysvol rights ok? > If so, just ignore these message. > There think there is nothing wrong with your sysvol rights, old bug imo. > > Greetz, > > Louis > > > > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at
2014 Jun 23
1
Command samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
Can anyone explain what is happening when I run / usr / local / samba / bin / samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck it and an error? ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO file /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/tdsfs01.net/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/USER/Scripts/scripts.ini
2023 Oct 19
1
Error in samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
Hi! I executed the command "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" on a DC and I got the following I pasted below. The first DC was provisioned migrating from a samba NT4 PDC with an LDAP backend using the classic upgrade procedure. I haven't detected any problem but I wanted to make sure there isn't any problem I might not be seeing yet. ERROR(<class