similar to: TSIG failure

On 22/07/16 07:32, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 00:18 +1200, Garming Sam wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've been looking into a similar sounding issue and which I think is >> a >> regression in 4.3. (Amazingly there's so few people with mixed >> domains, >> probably in particular ones which require joining additional DCs at >>

Hello, I still receive this error in my log.samba and when running '/samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names'. Has this been fixed completely? Searching through the archives I see this post https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2013-February/090408.html. Using Samba 4.1.7 with Ubuntu Server 12.04. My understanding is the update still succeeds but the error is

when you read. : http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg111972.html says: > >That output > ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure >is usually only seen when the internal DNS server is running. >It's a glitch, which can be ignored atm (all dyn. updates are done OK). > so if you dont want to see that error, switch to bind9_DLZ. Greetz, Louis

Hi I know that this has been addressed before but I couldn't find a solution. Summary: when attempting to write a dns record using nsupdate, nothing gets written to the zone due to the error: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure Everything is working. We can login to the domain from the same client and we have sssd sending the dyndns update requests which also produce the same

Hi Rowland, Before to add 'dns update command = /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate --use-samba-tool' I've tried once to run 'samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names' and it has returned me TSIG error again. More precisely, 'TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure' -- Igor Sousa Em sex, 9 de ago de 2019 ?s 18:14, Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org>

Em sex, 9 de ago de 2019 ?s 17:26, Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu: > Well it shouldn't ;-) > > Each DC should use itself for its nameserver > Ok. I understand and I think I've forgotten any step when I had mounted 'king'. My bad! I've set 'king' IP as the only namesever on resolv.conf and I've got a new Kerberos

I've set up a lab for testing Samba 4.1 as an RODC emulating a satellite office setup, using the sernet packages on SLES11SP2. ## Problem 1 samba_dnsupdate is failing: ==> /var/log/samba/log.samba <== [2013/11/18 13:22:37.416193, 0] ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:317(samba_runcmd_io_handler) /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure [2013/11/18

Hi! My Samba 4 system seems to be running reasonably well, but... I am getting the following error: TSIG error with servier: tsig verify failure Faied nsupdate: 2 yadda, yadda. This is from the command *samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names *All I can find on the web is time synchronization problems. Any ideas? I can send a full transcript if it would help.. Thanks! -jimc

I've configured samba4 as PDC according to the official HOWTO. Nearly everything went well, except that executing command samba_dnsupdate results with: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure Failed nsupdate: 2 Failed update of 21 entries The whole output is available at: http://pastebin.com/xrG2KZwZ It's wired, because domain seems working properly: I can login as domain admin,

Hai? ? Im running:?debian wheezy, sernet samba 4.1.3 , DC, in windows 2008 AD domain. ? Im reading the wiki and i stumbled on this. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns-backend_bind? semanage fcontext -a -t named_var_run_t /usr/local/samba/private/dns/${MYREALM}.zone semanage fcontext -a -t named_var_run_t /usr/local/samba/private/dns/${MYREALM}.zone.jnl the strange thing is, and this is

Hello everybody, I've had a samba environment with the following "brief" description: - There are 2 DC (*samba4 *and *samba4bkp*) running samba version 4.1.6 on my domain (*SMB*). DNS back end is Samba Internal DNS; - I've added a new DC (*king*) running samba version 4.10.2 and as DC to *SMB *domain with BIND9 DNS Back End; - *king* has updated dns zones and

On 07/08/2019 23:17, Igor Sousa via samba wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I've had a samba environment with the following "brief" description: > > - There are 2 DC (*samba4 *and *samba4bkp*) running samba version 4.1.6 Ouch, using seriously old and EOL Samba versions is not a good idea. I would suggest you upgrade at regular intervals. > on my domain (*SMB*).

sure.. but we need some info.. OS used? compiled samba or binaries used from OS or Sernet Samba ? samba version? ( 4.1.17 ) The output of you bind9 config files. and the output of the smb.conf and the provisoning.. done how? best is the line u used. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: johannesa at celluloid-vfx.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at

On 09/08/2019 21:19, Igor Sousa wrote: > Em qui, 8 de ago de 2019 ?s 04:30, Rowland penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>> escreveu: > > > What a lot of work you didn't need to do, 'samba-tool domain demote > --remove-other-dead-server=samba4bkp' would have done it for you ;-) > > Good to know it.

On 11/08/2019 02:36, Igor Sousa wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > I've added 'dns update command' on global section of smb.conf file and > I've configured namesever on '/etc/resolv.conf' as 127.0.0.1 (I've > tried with 'kings' IP address too), but I don't know if this has > worked. I've seen some dns updates errors on 'systemctl status

I've found divergences when I've compared the dns entries on 'king' and 'samba4' servers ('samba4' has the fsmo roles on 'SMB' domain). There are some 'samba4bkp' entries on 'king' and theses same entries there aren't on 'samba4'. I've understood that I've could to demoting 'samba4bkp' using samba-tool, but master

On 13/08/2019 21:28, Igor Sousa wrote: > I've found divergences when I've compared the dns entries on 'king' > and 'samba4' servers ('samba4' has the fsmo roles on 'SMB' domain). > There are some 'samba4bkp' entries on 'king' and theses same entries > there aren't on 'samba4'. I've understood that I've could

Em seg, 12 de ago de 2019 ?s 14:36, Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu: > > OOOOOPPPPSSSS > > > > You have compiled Samba yourself, so samba_dnsupdate will not be in > > /usr/sbin, it will be in /usr/local/samba/sbin > > > > so change the line in smb.conf to: > > > > dns update command =

Em qui, 8 de ago de 2019 ?s 04:30, Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu: > > What a lot of work you didn't need to do, 'samba-tool domain demote > --remove-other-dead-server=samba4bkp' would have done it for you ;-) > Good to know it. I'll tried if I face the same problem. Em qui, 8 de ago de 2019 ?s 04:30, Rowland penny via samba <

Rowland, thank you for answering! I have investigated this a bit, and I think that using 18.04 for the new DC will not be successful anyway. Reasons: the AD I have has been created back in the days when 14.04 LTS was fresh. The provisioning scripts worked differently. 14.04 has been upgraded to 16.04, and I think that I do not have all of the DNSes configured properly and this might be the cause