similar to: Samba 4.4.5 exists with segmention fault on FreeBSD 10.3 during domain provision

Hi Michael, I'm facing the same problem, samba 4.4.x is apparently broken on FreeBSD for now. Here's a link to the bug https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209787 For now the port maintainer seem out of ideas to fix this. You seems more skilled then me on freebsd, maybe you can help him on this bug :) DS On 07/20/2016 02:17 AM, Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi folks,

I'm trying to move some roaming profiles from Domain A to B. All of the profiles are from XP SP3. The originating machine is Debian 5/AMD64, samba 3.4.5 from Debian packages. The destination machine is Ubuntu 9.10, but x86. From everything I've read and found online, `profiles` is supposed to work for XP with no problems. When I attempt to do a SID change on NTUSER.DAT, I get

Hi folks, we'd like to provision new Samba servers (file sharing only) with the system keytab. It will precreated by some other process (msktutil) because we don't have direct access to a domain admin account. Is there any degragation in functionality by not using "secrets and keytab" and not doing "net ads join"? This is somewhat similiar to my question from

Hi, Samba internally uses 8 bytes to encode/decode uid_t/gid_t, e.g., _PUBLIC_ enum ndr_err_code ndr_push_uid_t(struct ndr_push *ndr, int ndr_flags, uid_t u) { NDR_PUSH_CHECK_FLAGS(ndr, ndr_flags); return ndr_push_hyper(ndr, NDR_SCALARS, (uint64_t)u); } I want to know if it is safe to use 4 bytes to reduce the size in storing security_info in tdb. I am not aware of if there is

Am 2019-01-10 um 17:02 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:23:06 +0100 > "Osipov, Michael via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> we'd like to provision new Samba servers (file sharing only) with the >> system keytab. It will precreated by some other process (msktutil) >> because we

> On 11 Jan 2019, at 10:33, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 09:39:35 +0100 > "Osipov, Michael via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Am 2019-01-10 um 17:02 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:23:06 +0100 >>> "Osipov, Michael via samba"

> On 11 Jan 2019, at 12:34, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 12:03:30 +0100 > "Remy Zandwijk \(Samba\) via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> >>> On 11 Jan 2019, at 10:33, Rowland Penny via samba >>> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>

Hi folks, we have recently tried to join several FreeBSD machines to your forest where the machine accounts where pre-created by the core admin team. We did as root: # kinit 'machine-name$' # net ads join ... Unfortunately, it failed with an error that several attributes cannot be set which are available to domain admins only. It ultimately means that one cannot use pre-created

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Remy > Zandwijk (Samba) via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 11 januari 2019 14:38 > Aan: Remy Zandwijk (Samba) via samba > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Running off pre-created keytabs > > > > > On 11 Jan 2019, at 14:25, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at

hi cant get wine compiled, tried the wineinstall script as user, these are the last lines :( Preparing to install default Wine registry entries... Installing default Wine registry entries... ./wineinstall: line 648: 28561 Segmentation fault $REGEDIT $DEFREG >/dev/null Registry install failed. permissions of /dev/null are 777 any ideas are welcome

Hi. Current host OS: CentOS5.9 Current client OS: Windows XP (all the latest stuff) Current Samba: 3.6.6-0.129.el5 Ever since 3.4 I am having problems with the "/usr/bin/profiles" binary, it does NOT allow me to change a SID within a registry file. However, using an older version of the binary (3.0.33-3.29.el5_5.1) it does. If I execute the following command (note the last 4 digits on

Hello all: I am trying to build smbtorture using static linked libraries. The samba source code I have is samba-4.1.13 for configure, I did: waf configure --builtin-libraries=ALL for build, I did: waf build --targets=smbtorture (so that it only build target smbtorture) But, the waf build fails immediately. Then, I tried to only link with lib talloc and tevent statically, so I did: waf

Hi. I have just changed to the latest version of samba on a CentOS 5.4 machine as I now have Win7 computers in the domain. [root] #>smbd -V Version 3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2 On the old version (I think 3.0.29) I was able to change the SID on any NTUDER.DAT file happily. Now I cannot change SID on any NTUSER.DAT file. However, I can log into the domain using the username that is attached to the

Hi experts I have a trouble in access rights I am running Samba 3.0.31 on Solaris 10 x86 64 bits as member server of an Active Directory 2003 R2 domain (MYDOMAIN) using Identity Management for Unix I set rights to access a sub folder of a Samba share. On Solaris the user "toto" jdoe can write a new file. From Windows, the same user can't. Itlooks like OK when the primary group

Hi, I'm facing an issue with at least two Samba servers in production both showing important number of log entries like: smbd[27355]: PANIC: assert failed at smbd/oplock.c(149): exclusive_oplocks_open>=0 Looking at the source code, this panic is triggered when the number of exclusive oplocks for a given file becomes negative. Once triggered for one smbd process, this process can

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:33:26PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:14:00PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:06:42PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, as much as I'd like to avoid adding a new option, I guess we > > > have to do something about it, my latest take on this is >

This patch fixes all the incorrect uses of "then" that I could find on the whole SAMBA_4_0 branch. i.e. it is relative to svn://svnanon.samba.org/samba/branches/SAMBA_4_0 at revision 16046. Index: source/auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c =================================================================== --- source/auth/ntlmssp/ntlmssp_sign.c (revision 16046) +++

Hi all, I've got question (problem?) regarding samba exporting gpfs filesystem. My setup is very simple - gpfs client machine with gpfs filesystem mounted and samba server running on the top of it. I compiled samba with gpfs support, here is my smb.conf section: [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes fileid:mapping = fsname use mmap = no

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 04:03:49PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 02:46:19PM -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:44:05PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote: > > > > > > Cheerio! > > > -slow > > > > Still reviewing this - but a few things that will need changing: > > > > When adding the

On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 09:39:35 +0100 "Osipov, Michael via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 2019-01-10 um 17:02 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:23:06 +0100 > > "Osipov, Michael via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> we'd like to provision