Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "samba log question"
2017 Mar 30
2
JPG issue
Ok, it's taken me a while, but here's what seems to be the problem. In OSX
I see a lock on the file. If that lock is ON, it disappears. But what is
that lock and where did it come from.... Is it like a read only lock?
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:04 AM Curtis Vaughan <cavaughan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, here's what seems to be going on. When a JPG is put into a share it
>
2017 Mar 30
0
JPG issue
You have the setting on to HIDE files that can't be written to. Try turning
that off. Next, investigate why it's causing the files to get 540
permissions instead of 740 (or other).
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Curtis Vaughan via samba <
samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Ok, it's taken me a while, but here's what seems to be the problem. In OSX
> I see a lock on
2017 Mar 30
0
JPG issue
Ok, here's what seems to be going on. When a JPG is put into a share it
inherits permissions of 540. When I chmod it to 740 it appears in file
browsers. So the file is actually there, but invisible. But I've tried
other files and everything else copies over with 740. Again, why?
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:56 AM Curtis Vaughan <cavaughan at gmail.com> wrote:
> [global]
>
>
2017 Mar 30
2
JPG issue
[global]
workgroup = NPC
server string = Samba Server %v
netbios name = Atlantica
security = user
map to guest = bad user
dns proxy = no
hide files = /~*/
hide unwriteable files = yes
#============================ Share Definitions
==============================
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
path = /home/%S
valid users = %S
browseable = no
guest ok = no
writable = yes
2016 Jul 20
2
Enable Recycling
So I've added the following information to my smb.conf in the general
section based off various information on the internet, but primarily from here:
http://timtrott.co.uk/enabling-recycle-bin-functionality-samba/
Nonetheless when I delete files from any shares they are not sent to
Recycling. What am I missing?
# Enable Recycling
vfs objects = full_audit recycle
recycle:repository =
2020 Nov 20
2
winbind use default domain = yes doesn't work on Samba 4.13?
Yes.
In the first name, I wrote DOMAIN, but our real workgroup is SVMETAL,
as you cas see in smb.conf.
[global]
netbios name = fs0001
workgroup = SVMETAL
security = ADS
realm = SAMDOM.SVMETAL.CZ
dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab
kerberos method = secrets and keytab
acl allow execute always = True
idmap config *:backend = tdb
idmap config *:range = 70001-99999
idmap config
2023 Aug 24
0
Samba recycle bin excludedir doesn't work for me
Hello,
I'm testing the "recycle: excludedir" option of Samba recycle bin but
for some reason every deleted file is sent to the recycle bin, even
those in excluded paths. Using samba/focal-updates,now
2:4.15.13+dfsg-0ubuntu0.20.04.4.
This is the config for that share:
---
[SHARE1]
??? path = /isp/SHARE1
??? browseable = no
??? force create mode = 0660
??? force directory
2005 Jun 03
1
HELP! After upgrade, can't get at my shares
I'm really not looking forward to downgrading because of this but if
this persists much longer I'll have to. :-(
Platform: MDV LE 2005
Previous version was 3.0.9 I think. Whatever the default for Mdk 10.1
Official was.
samba-swat-3.0.14a-2mdk
samba-smbldap-tools-3.0.14a-2mdk
samba-doc-3.0.14a-2mdk
samba-client-3.0.14a-2mdk
samba-common-3.0.14a-2mdk
samba-vscan-clamav-3.0.14a-2mdk
2006 Apr 20
0
how to use recycle:excludedir
I've Samba 3.0.14a running without hassles on a ubuntu machine. Just one
detail is bugging me. The recycle:excludedir doesn't seam to work.
I've tried several options: absolute paths, relative paths, with and without
comma...restarting samba, reloading, logging off and on. no chance
this is my share:
[projects]
comment = put projects here
path = /mnt/raid/projects
2005 Sep 28
0
VFS recycle - can't get exclude_dir to work
Hello
I'm testing the VFS recycle stuff on a 3.0.14a-Debian (Debian Sarge,
kernel 2.6.8-2). The smb.conf share config part looks like this:
[write]
path = /sambashared/write
browseable = yes
writable = yes
public = yes
vfs object = recycle
#recycle:repository = ../readonly
recycle:keeptree = yes
recycle:versions = yes
recycle:touch = yes
recycle:maxsize = 1000000
2016 Apr 27
0
Samba 4 permissions error
On 27/04/16 19:55, Jason Voorhees wrote:
>> OK, you have two DCs, on one, your user can access a share, you basically
>> copy the shares to another DC (with all the same permissions etc) and your
>> user cannot access the share on the second DC.
>>
>> How is AD set up ? are you using uidNumber & gidNumber attributes (you will
>> have added them manually) or
2016 Aug 24
0
Linux Work Station USER ID PROBLEM
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:42:35 +0300
barış tombul <bbtombul at gmail.com> wrote:
> centos workstation: smb.conf >>
>
> [global]
> workgroup = LAB
> realm = LAB.LOCAL
> security = ads
> idmap config * : range = 16777216-33554431
> template homedir = /home/LAB/%U
> template shell = /bin/bash
> winbind use default domain = true
>
2016 Apr 27
2
Samba 4 permissions error
> OK, you have two DCs, on one, your user can access a share, you basically
> copy the shares to another DC (with all the same permissions etc) and your
> user cannot access the share on the second DC.
>
> How is AD set up ? are you using uidNumber & gidNumber attributes (you will
> have added them manually) or are you using the xidNumbers created
> automatically by
2003 Aug 04
0
Réf. : Réf. : trash can on samba
Mateus, here is a more complex (working !) example :
vfs objects = recycle
recycle:name = .recycle
; max-size (in bytes) of files allowed in the recycle bin
recycle:maxsize = 2000000
; keep directory trees ?
recycle_keeptree = True
; files to exclude from the bin
recycle:exclude = *.tmp *.temp *.swp
; root dirs to exclude from the bin
recycle:exclude_dir = tmp
; include file versionning in the
2016 Apr 28
2
Samba 4 permissions error
This is a normal behaviour if you are using several dcs. Users und groups do have another gid/uid on each server
until you fix it manually. This was a hard experiennce and work even fo rme which I suggest that this should be
the next goal for the samba 4 developers to solve and fix it in an easy way for the admins.
In my opinion, if I run several dcs in a domain this should be done between the
2013 Sep 26
1
Samba 3.6.15 Not honouring create mode
Using samba 3 as cluster share for many years now and we now need to for
the create mode on files. This seems to not be working in3.6.15.
Here is my config
[global]
workgroup = TAYLORTELEPHONE
realm = TAYLORTELEPHONE.COM
netbios name = SHR01
server string = Cluster Share
interfaces = eth0, eth1, lo
security = ADS
private dir = /clusterdata/ctdb
log file =
2019 Feb 19
0
samba 4.8x problem
testparm command output:
# Global parameters
[global]
allow dns updates = nonsecure and secure
bind interfaces only = Yes
client NTLMv2 auth = No
client signing = required
cups connection timeout = 60
dcerpc endpoint servers = epmapper, wkssvc, rpcecho, samr, netlogon,
lsarpc, drsuapi, dssetup, unixinfo, browser, eventlog6, backupkey, remote,
dnsserver
dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab
2012 Aug 15
1
samba 3 create_connection_server_info failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
Hi everybody.... I'm trying to build a fileserver with samba. And I had it
ok when users where authenticating via samba, but I changed the
authentication method to OpenLDAP, and for some strange reason users can
not access the shares anymore... it is giving me this error:
"create_connection_server_info failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED".
I have chacked the permission in the SO and is
2013 Mar 15
1
There are no currently logon servers available when mapping with "net use"
Hi people, I have a problem and I need so much of your help.
I have a login script in \\server1\netlogon\script.bat (on my PDC and BDC)
that runs "net use" commands to map some shares in time of the logon.
This login tries to map share in another server (samba member of domain
\\server2).
So, I put the result at a log and appears these lines:
"
System error 1311 has occurred.
2009 Apr 01
5
Fun with permissions
Firstly, hello! :)
I've been trying to setup a share with permissions to allow users within
the web group to be able to put files up, have full access to their own
files but read only access to other users files, I've got what I think
should work, but it's not (hence this post).
The relevant section of the config is as follows
[Common]
comment = Common Area
writable = yes