similar to: Option configure

Hello, Am 09.07.2016 um 09:14 schrieb Rowland penny: >> What is the purpose of the option >> * >> **--with-**systemd** >> ****Enable****systemd****integration* >> >> To configure Samba (build). >> > > It is there so that there is also the '--without-systemd' option. > > one turns on systemd integration, the other (thank your deity)

Hello! I have some doubts that the samba.org site found nothing Samba (current apcote 4.4.2) compatible with Ubuntu 04.16? It works with systemd? (On ubuntu) Some sound interesting? Thank you

Am 09.07.2016 um 17:19 schrieb Rowland penny: > On 09/07/16 10:27, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: >> What is different afterwards when using with/without? Does it create a >> systemd service file? >> > Do not know about '--with-systemd', but there are no (horrible) systemd > components if you use '--without-systemd' there is nothing horrible in a systemd

Hello! Sorry for my bad English. My doubts and concerning the compilation of the package in Ubuntu 16.04, if any incompatibility? Regarding Systemd, everything OK? Thank you. Em 28-04-2016 11:55, Rowland penny escreveu: > On 28/04/16 14:40, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: >> Hello! >> I have some doubts that the samba.org site found nothing >> Samba (current apcote 4.4.2)

2016-07-10 2:12 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org>: > On Sat, 2016-07-09 at 11:27 +0200, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Am 09.07.2016 um 09:14 schrieb Rowland penny: > > > > What is the purpose of the option > > > > * > > > > **--with-**systemd** > > > > ****Enable****systemd****integration* >

Really my user IDs are different, but I can not adjust it. Using Samba 4.3.3 (Upgrade from 4.2 -> 4.3 -> 4.3.3), I think it has something it was initially used with Windows 2003 (no longer usaddo) to replicate data Win 2003 -> Samba. Today only own Samba (which had to increase Schema) Em 29-03-2016 10:27, Sketch escreveu: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: >

Hello! I am following the how to https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/User_home_drives But even though there reported a process for User X does not access the home of Y User, this is happening root at fileserver:/srv/samba# getfacl home/ # file: home/ # owner: root # group: root user::rwx user:root:rwx user:administrator:rwx group::r-x group:root:r-x group:5007:r-x group:domain\040admins:rwx

I do not speak Spanish, I am using a web server, which is not locally on Samba 4, but on the same network. OS: CentOS 7 64-bit [Root @ webserver conf] # rpm -qa | grep httpd httpd-tools-2.4.6-31.el7.centos.x86_64 httpd-2.4.6-31.el7.centos.x86_64 [Root @ webserver conf] # [Root @ webserver conf] # rpm -qa | grep php php-pear-1.9.4-21.el7.noarch php-pear-Net-Socket-1.0.14-1.el7.noarch

You should run : ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b "CN=msSFU-30-Mail-Aliases,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=MYDOMAIN,DC=com" -s base possSuperiors If the result is : # record 1 dn: CN=msSFU-30-Mail-Aliases,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=DEVINLECLECLERC,DC=com possSuperiors: container possSuperiors: domainDNS possSuperiors: nisMap Then it's OK, the script tried to add a

Hello! I'm not using graphical interface kkkkk hug Em 10-05-2016 15:35, Rowland penny escreveu: > On 10/05/16 18:37, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: >> I do not speak Spanish, I am using a web server, which is not locally >> on Samba 4, but on the same network. >> >> OS: CentOS 7 64-bit > > Are you running Gnome3 ?? if so, you do not need anything else, GDM3 >

Rowland I'm guessing I was wrong, but my fear now is that I change this setting, change my UID / GID, and stop sharing accesses. Is this going to happen? But by the very doubt, would that affect my problem, since it seems to be something with kerberos? Thanks Em 09-01-2017 09:16, Rowland Penny via samba escreveu: > On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 08:59:40 -0200 > "Carlos A. P. Cunha"

Can return old id, returning the old values (changed the most at least two months) idmap config *: backend = tdb idmap config *:range = 5000-16777216 idmap config SERVERAD: backend = rid idmap config SERVERAD: range = 5000-33554431 The error parrou also, but I think the fact that a group with the same ID / GID if the User to the fact that the idmap values be crossing, even so I changed them

On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:32:08 -0300 "Carlos A. P. Cunha via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello! > > Any idea ? > > Regards > You can ignore the 'Not removing dangling forward link' errors, they do not affect AD. Rowland

That's one things to add schema in your AD, that's another thing to use that schema. Adding schema for rfc2307 in AD grant you possibility to set uidNumber, gidNumber, loginShell and others attributes to your AD users. That grant you that possibility but you are free to use that possibility. Next step is to define xidNumber to your users. 2016-06-14 18:31 GMT+02:00 Carlos A. P. Cunha

Hello! I do not use sssd use winbind. When I mentioned in the lines workgroup and realm, they are like this (for example) Workgroup = INTRNAL Realm = INTERNAL.TESTE.COM.BR I do not know if that was what caused the confusion .... Thanks Em 08-01-2017 20:28, Rowland Penny via samba escreveu: > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:04:41 -0200 > "Carlos A. P. Cunha" <carlos.hollow at

msDS-isRODC is introduced in version 32 of the schema. This is the problem I faced. You can have a look to https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-August/193258.html. --------------------------------------------- Christophe Borivant Responsable d'exploitation informatique +33 5 62 20 71 71 (Poste 503) Devinlec - Groupe Leclerc -------------------------------------------- ----- Mail

Hello! I have 2 Samba 4 server (4.3.3) as VC and other Samba 4 (4.3) as Fileserver, until now all ok, but I'm one doubts, how to validate that in both servers the domain IDs of the users of this identical, a simple way to do this validation? I wanted to make sure it is a DC die fileserver has to go 100%. thank you

:-| ls -lnd /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol drwxrwx---+ 3 0 3000000 4096 Jun 16 13:56 /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol Em 16-06-2017 13:38, Rowland Penny via samba escreveu: > On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:15:19 -0300 > "Carlos A. P. Cunha" <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: > >> OK, sorry, uncomment a line :-D >> >> Yes exist! >> >> ls -ld

Hello! My smb.conf [global] workgroup = <DOMAIN> realm = <SUBDOMAIN.DOMAIN.COM.BR> security = ADS idmap config * : backend = rid idmap config * : range = 100000-999999 client schannel = no allow trusted domains = yes winbind use default domain = yes winbind refresh tickets = Yes winbind

Some things to check out for linux-based patch management of Windows (and other) clients: http://vfense.github.io/vFense/ <http://vfense.github.io/vFense/> http://www.opsi.org/en <http://www.opsi.org/en> Thomas Maerz Network/Systems Administrator Brewer Science, Inc. A+ NET+ CCENT MCDST tmaerz at brewerscience.com <mailto:tmaerz at brewerscience.com> work: 573-364-0444 x1402