similar to: What's the difference between source3 and source4 in samba? How to use an asynchronous file system?

Dear everybody, Could anybody told me the reason? Does the code of samba 3 and samba 4 mix together in the master branch. How can I let smbd be compiled from source4/smbd/server.c? Thanks and Have a good weekend Jun The following is what I got from the command line: junyij-2.desktop$ ./smbd [2012/09/28 17:36:18, 0] ../lib/util/debug.c:592(reopen_logs_internal) Unable to open new log file

I am building in source4. Where are these symbols defined? Is any library that is not getting linked? samba/source4 # make WAF_MAKE=1 ../buildtools/bin/waf build Waf: Entering directory `/usr/src/bamba/samba/source4/bin' [1816/1961] Linking default/source4/lib/ldb/libldb-samba4.so [1908/1961] Linking default/source4/lib/ldb/ldbadd default/source4/lib/ldb/libldb-samba4.so: undefined

Hi Thanks in advanced. I'm writing a proxy server doing NTLMv2 authentication. I think I need a NetLogon client service . Is there any available library providing netlogon function? or at least an dce rpc library? an asynchronous library is the best. :) Thanks again. Derek.

I just ran into this very problem myself. Yes, this is a bug in prototype. If you look in the code you will see that the relevent handlers and callbacks simply aren''t called with a synchronous request (onComplete is similarly not called). I submitted a patch <http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4657> over at dev.rubyonrails.org which fixes this behavior. If you decide to check it

Whenever I use periodically_call_remote it outputs as the following: <script type="text/javascript"> //<![CDATA[ new PeriodicalExecuter(function() {new Ajax.Request(''some_url'', {asynchronous:true, evalScripts:true})}, 2) //]]> </script> If I understand correctly, setting asynchronous to true means that if one request takes longer than 2 seconds,

I was just working on a project where I needed to use Ajax.Updater with a synchronous request. It appears like all one would need to do is set the asynchronous option to false. I tried this and noticed that the content was being requested synchronously but the content was never injected into the DOM tree like one would expect from Ajax.Updater. In order to get the content returned by

Hello, Is there any straightforward way to see whether Samba is using "asynchronous i/o"? In other words, if you specify in smb.conf to use aio for all transfers larger than 1 KB (pretty much everything), how can you tell that aio is actually being used? Are there any counters in Linux or in some samba logs that you can see incrementing over time? Thanks in advance. -- Andy

Hi Sohail, > Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? not currently. The first step in this direction is to get rid of the invoke instruction and attach exception handling information to basic blocks. See http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/ExceptionHandlingChanges.txt for a discussion. Ciao, Duncan.

On 11-06-12 8:53 PM, John McCall wrote: >> > The CFG point is a valid point. In what I've read on the topic so far >> > (yay Internet), it seems like the CFG would have to represent the fact >> > that control can jump to a handler after nearly every instruction in the >> > presence of async exceptions. The Hotspot compiler probably does this. >> >

On Jun 13, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: >> There is really no alternative to putting EH edges on basic blocks if you're going to support preemptive asynchronous exceptions — some random multiply that gets hoisted out of a loop has to change exception handlers just in case that's where the PC lands during a signal. There isn't much point in complaining that doing so

On Jun 13, 2011, at 2:12 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: > Although I believe asynchronous signals are also best handled by the runtime. They can be converted into cooperative exceptions. I have to say I can't see the value in resuming from an interrupt at literally any instruction address. For what it's worth, SEH (which inspires a lot of this) allows blocks of code to be protected from

Hello, As part of the Rust bindings for Libnbd, I try to integrate the asynchronous (aio_*) functions with Tokio <https://docs.rs/tokio/latest/tokio/>, the most used asynchronous runtime in Rust. However, in its eventloop, Tokio uses epoll(7) instead of poll(2) (which is used internally in Libnbd). The difference is that poll(2) uses level-triggered notifications as aposed to epoll(7)

On 13 June 2011 22:27, John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> wrote: > But yes, I am not inclined to support asynchronous exceptions from signals. Ah, ok. I was beginning to wonder... ;) --renato

Hi, I'm developing a virtualised audio / DSP virtio and vhost driver pair and I'm currently somewhat stuck trying to figure out how to asynchronously notify the guest from the vhost driver. I'm using the vhost_add_used_and_signal() function to return data back to the guest in the guest context, when the guest initiated an operation, that's working well. But how do I

Hello, I've written a BSD application that has to do many parallel CIFS authentications, SID to name, and name to SID operations. It was written using smbclient application as an example and links against libsmb. The problem is that it doesn't seem possible to send a large number of parallel operations to the domain controller using the samba libraries, unless I fork a lot of processes,

On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 3:38?PM Tage Johansson <tage.j.lists at posteo.net> wrote: > As part of the Rust bindings for Libnbd, I try to integrate the > asynchronous (aio_*) functions with Tokio > <https://docs.rs/tokio/latest/tokio/>, the most used asynchronous runtime > in Rust. However, in its eventloop, Tokio uses epoll(7) instead of poll(2) > (which is used internally

Hi Railers, I''m looking for something to do asynchronous encryption - where the encryption and decryption keys are different. This is for a scenario where I want to be able to store some information in the database that can only be decrypted in a different physical location using a secret private key (which will not be stored on the machine doing the encrypting). I''m trying

On Jun 12, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Cameron Zwarich <zwarich at apple.com> wrote: > On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > >> Hi Sohail, >> >>> Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? >> >> not currently. The first step in this direction is to get rid of the invoke >> instruction and attach exception handling

Author: arutz Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 27575db763e2bf926e8c2aaedcb607e5eaf31a72 Log message: 6216819 smserverd''s use of asynchronous cancellation needs investigation Files: update: usr/src/cmd/smserverd/smediad.c update: usr/src/cmd/smserverd/smediad_err.c update: usr/src/cmd/smserverd/smserver.h

I''m a bit unclear how to use/try de-duplication in asynchronous mode? Can someone kindly clarify? Is it as simple as enabling then disabling after something completes? Thanks -- This message posted from opensolaris.org