similar to: Bug number for an old commit

On Thursday, July 07, 2016 01:46:59 PM Rowland penny wrote: > On 07/07/16 13:09, John Mulligan wrote: > > Hi Samba team, > > > > Digging through some old code and commits while trying to understand some > > ACL related behavior we found the following: > > > > https://git.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=commitdiff;h=6dcbb84d485b8a8ccf0c3a70 > >

Hello samba list, We're trialling Samba 3.6 and on some of our systems I see the following type of messages in the smbd and winbind logs: [2012/03/16 17:28:59.038177, 0] ../lib/util/tdb_wrap.c:65(tdb_wrap_log) tdb(/var/lib/samba/messages.tdb): tdb_oob len 663932 beyond eof at 12288 [2012/03/16 17:28:59.038331, 0] ../lib/util/tdb_wrap.c:65(tdb_wrap_log)

On 07/07/16 13:09, John Mulligan wrote: > Hi Samba team, > > Digging through some old code and commits while trying to understand some ACL > related behavior we found the following: > > https://git.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=commitdiff;h=6dcbb84d485b8a8ccf0c3a70d9f5f7e951aaf1c6 > > While the commit message itself provides some context the subject mentions > fixing

Release Announcements ===================== This is the fourth release candidate of Samba 4.18.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.18 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the fourth release candidate of Samba 4.18.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.18 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

On 11/04/2023 13:36, Gary Dale via samba wrote: > On 2023-04-11 04:15, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> What 'Debian distribution-specific' installation did you follow ? > The one linked to in AD DC wiki. Where abouts is this link ? I checked here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller But couldn't

Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of Samba 4.18.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.18 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of Samba 4.18.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.18 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Hi, In reading this list I see a lot of talk about samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset actually breaking things. Given the above How do I properly configure a 2nd AD DC or setup sysvol replication? For instance If I were to follow https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory In the Built-in Groups GID Mappings section the last thing it says to do is run samba-tool

Hello,     I would like to share some info on how I was able to successfully run an online backup after several failed attempts. I would constantly get the following error when attempting to run an online backup. ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (3221225506, '{Access Denied} A process has requested access to an object but has not been granted those access rights.') Looking

Hi, I'm trying to setup a domain with two DCs based on 4.0.3. Following some hint, I wanna use glusterfs for the sysvol. Glusterfs it runs nicely. I can set acls on both machines using setfacl and the other one lists them almost immediately with getfacl. But running "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset is failing badly giving the following error. In a later attempt, without significant

On two Samba 4.4.2/4.4.3 member servers, "samba-tool ntacl get --as-sddl" gives the following error: ERROR: Unable to read domain SID from configuration files Which configuration files is it referring to? Without "--as-sddl" the command gives a correct output. It would be nice to get the permissions in sddl format... The same command works as expected on two AC DCs.

Hi, My DC doesn't know domains users and groups by name, only by uid/gid. Ex: chmod mike:'EMPRESA\unix_admins' test chown: invalid group mike:EMPRESA\\unix_admins if run with GID work properly chmod mike:30059 test drwxr-xr-x 2 root 30059 4096 Jul 6 00:17 test There is unix_admins group wbinfo --gid-info 30059 EMPRESA\unix_admins:x:30059: In File Server Domain Member

The patch http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commitdiff;h=0bea5fb96436588b4e78c5be79bf174b9be7a202 changes the type of t value from FLAC__int32 to uint32_t, but only for 24-bit signed input samples. 24-bit *un*signed input still uses FLAC__int32 t. So I wonder - does it makes sense to change this type too? The patch is attached. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

On 1/30/24 16:27, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:13:41 +0100 > Peter Milesson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> It seems that the setting acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes reduces >> Windows compatibility when defined for a share. In all attempts I >> have used Windows tools (except editing

Hello, I have been having problems installing the Login Engine. I follow all the steps found on the download site (rails-engines.org), but when I get to the DB_SCHEMA step, I do rake engine_migrate ENGINE=login in the application root. """ C:\rails\cag> rake engine_migrate ENGINE=login (in C:/rails/cag) rake aborted! Don''t know how to build task

On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 16:13:41 +0100 Peter Milesson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi folks, > > It seems that the setting acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes reduces > Windows compatibility when defined for a share. In all attempts I > have used Windows tools (except editing smb.conf) Lets walk through the relevant part of that parameter: 'ignore system

Hi, I try to find a solution for migrating files from a samba server with share access configure at share level in the smb.conf to a new fileserver with Windows ACL configured shares. I did a rsync from the old share to the new server and tried to set the ACL on windows with the "Computer Manager“. But I get an error when applying the rights that the enumerating of objects in the container

> > What is in the username map ? > !root = NAME\Administrator NAME\administrator Administrator administrator

That's not a problem its just a ACL provisioning message as you can see the result was "DAG:DAD:PAI" but expected was "O:DAG:DAD:PAR" that's "normal" ;-) just ignore it or do a "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset" Am 19.10.23 um 17:27 schrieb bd730c5053df9efb via samba: > Hi! > > I executed the command "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck"