similar to: DNS issues

I bumped the logging up. samba-tool domain level raise --domain-level=2008_R2 schema_fsmo_init: we are master[yes] updates allowed[no] schema_fsmo_init: we are master[yes] updates allowed[no] The updates_allowed[no] concerns me? On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Jason Waters <jason at geeknocity.com> wrote: > I'm pretty sure the domain level raise is failing on this system.

Hello, we have the following problem with a ADDC Sernet 4.7.6-11 on CentOS 7.4. We have two DCs, replication is working fine. We use bind9 as dns-backend. When we do a "samba_dnsupdate --all-names" we get the following messages: ------------------- [root at dc1 ~]# samba_dnsupdate --all-names dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable

Hello I tried on two vms on my vmware Workstation to use samba as DC. I want use BIND for dns system. To join the Domain had worked successfully after I recompiled the bind. It seems the zone are the same but Samba isn't in the ns-record. If I run dcpromo.exe I get this error message: This Active Directory DC is the last dns-server for the AD-zones. If I remove the DC the dns-names

Many (many) hours later, I'm finally throwing in the towel and seeking help. I have read everything I can find on the internet to no avail to get past my issues. I have to say, I'm very disappointed in the general quality and fragmentation of information on this topic. Samba isn't a turn-key solution as an AD by any stretch of the imagination. I've run the gamut so far with

I think I'm missing some SRV records... Calling nsupdate for SRV _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._ sites.ForestDnsZones.mydomain.com dc03.mydomain.com 389 (add) Outgoing update query: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: UPDATE, status: NOERROR, id: 0 ;; flags:; ZONE: 0, PREREQ: 0, UPDATE: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; UPDATE SECTION:

L.P.H. van Belle writes: > is the time in sync on your servers ? Yes it is. I managed to make it work by specifying the primary DC as nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf of the secondary DC. As soon as I do that, samba_dnsupdate works on the secondary. When I change it back to use the local Samba as resolver, it no longer works. So it is a DNS issue (possibly related to replication

On 11/19/2015 9:44 AM, Thierry Hotelier wrote: > hello, > we've just upgraded from samba 3.6.6 to samba 4.3.0. We are using > INTERNAL as dns backend. We have 1 domain and 6 DCs on 5 different > sites. Replication between DCs is ok as we can see with "samba-tool > drs showrepl". We configured them like it is described on the wiki and > used the RSAT tool

It's me again :-) Now we have DDNS with DHCP running but we have a problem on one of our two DCs. Btw we used the setup and the script from wiki. Doing a "dhclient" on a host we are getting the following messages: ------------- Mai 16 12:13:28 samba41 dhcpd[3961]: Commit: IP: 192.168.0.249 DHCID: 1:50:5b:5d:1c:ab:aa Name: horst Mai 16 12:13:28 samba41 dhcpd[3961]: execute_statement

L.P.H. van Belle writes: > check the rights on : > /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab 640 root:bind > /var/lib/samba/private/dns 750 root:bind > /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d 750 root:bind I'm using the internal DNS on both DC's, so I guess bind access rights aren't the issue. Thanks for your answer though :) Regards, Roel > >-----Oorspronkelijk

Hello! I've got this error dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable when running samba_dnsupdate --verbose With this error dynamic entries stopped working as Type A machines that entered in the field or entry to a new DC. Already tried the step described here https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable But when trying to delete the account used the

I have installed samba from source (I've tried both V4-0-stable and v4-1-stable) using BIND9_DLZ on Ubuntu server 13.04 and I'm unable to get samba_dnsupdate to function. # samba_dnsupdate --all-names --fail-immediately will return dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable If I then try nsupdate directly: nsupdate -g /tmp/tmpEk4_WK I also get: dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is

Hi everyone, I'm testing with a Samba4 AD network, and I have some problems with DNS on the second DC, with which I could use a bit of your help. I have an AD with two DC's, both Samba 4.2.3. On the first DC, samba_dnsupdate works fine. With stock 4.2.3 I get the error "TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure" but the DNS updates succeed anyway, and after applying

Hello there. I´ve been having problems with dynamic dns update by dhcp on my samba ADDC running on CentOS 7 on an RPI2. After a while, the dhccp_dyndns.sh stops stops being able to authenticate with named. for the longest time I was stumped with this, exploring all kinds of kerberos issues, but found out that *restartint* named did resolve the issue. I have finally traced this problem down to a

Hi all, I am currently struggling to remove one of our Samba4 DC from the domain. Some time ago, adding a new Samba DC to our AD did not succeed and I had to demote the new server again. After removal, replication on one of the old/existing DCs got weird. /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool drs showrepl gives the following: Standardname-des-ersten-Standorts\dc02 DSA Options: 0x00000001 DSA object

The DDNS setup from the wiki uses the keytab of the seperate "Unprivileged user for TSIG-GSSAPI DNS updates via ISC DHCP server" you have to Check this one not the one which BIND uses. Regards Am 16.05.2018 um 12:45 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 16 May 2018 12:32:52 +0200 Stefan Kania via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> It's me

I tried to synchronize the sysvol folders, on two dcs. Something went wrong since yesterday we have replication problems: One machine shows this, while the other one is happy. samba-tool drs showrepl ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=ourdomain,DC=com Default-First-Site-Name\DC03 via RPC DSA object GUID: af610e1a-9e3b-4cdd-a36b-c296d77a9479 Last attempt @

Hello $LIST, i setup a new clean domain to examine the feature of updating/creating PTR records. When i call ipconfig /registerdns on the client i get this entry in the windows eventlog (sorry german) Fehler beim Registrieren der Hostressourceneinträge (A oder AAAA) für den Netzwerkadapter mit den folgenden Einstellungen: Adaptername: {2A467E48-624B-4CCF-9B7D-9BA5629D8117}

We are using Samba-4.1.11. I can run gpupdate /force without error on my machine. H:\>type \\dc01.mediture.dom\SysVol\mediture.dom\Policies\{77F82F0F-AE2B-42F3-B173-D42F4BEEC0BA}\gpt.ini [General] Version=65551 displayName=New Group Policy Object H:\>type \\dc02.mediture.dom\SysVol\mediture.dom\Policies\{77F82F0F-AE2B-42F3-B173-D42F4BEEC0BA}\gpt.ini [General] Version=65551 displayName=New

Hello Samba-ers, I tried to continue my Samba setup after a long pause doing other stuff. To recall, I want to run two Samba DCs for one domain as virtual machines on two Windows systems (I switched from VirtualBox to Hyper V, which helps to run them automatically at system startup, but I don´t think that really matters). Both DCs shall use themselves as DNS server as the VPN in between is

Thanks Rowland, You saved me from a world of pain, I've now got named back up and running and also accessible via windows DNS GUI. the SOA record still says ns=dc03.. which is strange and the only place dc03 exists in the ouput of samba-tool dns query localhost mydomain.com @ ALL Is this something I can fix in the windows DNS GUI or do I need to do something with like FSMO ? Which btw