similar to: winbind idmap_ad rfc2037 can't read UIdnumber

Le 04/07/2016 à 20:09, Rowland penny a écrit : > On 04/07/16 18:35, Raphaël RIGNIER wrote: >> Hi samba team ! >> >> I try to resolve for hours a problem I have with a Linux Host (Samba >> 4.3.9 ubutnu 16.04) as AD member.DCs are Windows 2008 R2, One is 2012 >> R2. Forest level is 2003 R2. >> >> my smb.conf : >> [GLOBAL] >> netbios

Le 05/07/2016 à 17:07, Rowland penny a écrit : > On 05/07/16 08:33, Raphaël RIGNIER wrote: >> Le 04/07/2016 à 20:09, Rowland penny a écrit : >>> On 04/07/16 18:35, Raphaël RIGNIER wrote: >>>> Hi samba team ! >>>> >>>> I try to resolve for hours a problem I have with a Linux Host >>>> (Samba 4.3.9 ubutnu 16.04) as AD member.DCs are

On 05/07/16 08:33, Raphaël RIGNIER wrote: > Le 04/07/2016 à 20:09, Rowland penny a écrit : >> On 04/07/16 18:35, Raphaël RIGNIER wrote: >>> Hi samba team ! >>> >>> I try to resolve for hours a problem I have with a Linux Host (Samba >>> 4.3.9 ubutnu 16.04) as AD member.DCs are Windows 2008 R2, One is >>> 2012 R2. Forest level is 2003 R2.

Le 05/07/2016 à 09:33, Raphaël RIGNIER a écrit : > Le 04/07/2016 à 20:09, Rowland penny a écrit : >> On 04/07/16 18:35, Raphaël RIGNIER wrote: >>> Hi samba team ! >>> >>> I try to resolve for hours a problem I have with a Linux Host (Samba >>> 4.3.9 ubutnu 16.04) as AD member.DCs are Windows 2008 R2, One is >>> 2012 R2. Forest level is 2003

On 04/07/16 18:35, Raphaël RIGNIER wrote: > Hi samba team ! > > I try to resolve for hours a problem I have with a Linux Host (Samba > 4.3.9 ubutnu 16.04) as AD member.DCs are Windows 2008 R2, One is 2012 > R2. Forest level is 2003 R2. > > my smb.conf : > [GLOBAL] > netbios name = CR-DEV-01 > security = ADS > workgroup = ADDOMAIN >

Le 05/07/2016 à 19:40, Rowland penny a écrit : > On 05/07/16 17:56, Raphaël RIGNIER wrote: >> The strange behavior is the different output between group object and >> user object >> >> and >> net ads search -U administrator >> net ads search -P >> >> in Samba Wiki, primarygroupid refers to the one for User's "Unix >>

>>>>>>>>>>> I've got a samba 4.2 DC, which has worked well for about a month >>>>>>>>>>> now. It >>>>>>>>>>> still works for all users except "Administrator". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If I login to a Windows box with the

Il 17/01/15 17:10, Rowland Penny ha scritto: > On 17/01/15 14:39, Carlo wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've got a samba 4.2 DC, which has worked well for about a month >>>>>>>>>>>>> now. It >>>>>>>>>>>>> still works for all users except "Administrator".

On 05/07/16 17:56, Raphaël RIGNIER wrote: > The strange behavior is the different output between group object and > user object > > and > net ads search -U administrator > net ads search -P > > in Samba Wiki, primarygroupid refers to the one for User's "Unix > Attributes" tab. Which is in fact GidNumber. (I have made tests to > check this) > The

On 11/16/2016 04:34 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > Provided that the group urbanweb exists in /etc/group and your users > are shown by getent passwd or id, then you could try the unix tools > i.e. usermod -G urbanweb ADDOMAIN\\1001362 > > Rowland Greetings, Thank you for the response. the matching UNIX group exists. Been using local groups on Samba for years. # getent

On 22.05.19 15:31, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Hai, > > Well, good that your more relax and releaved in pressure.. > Apoligies accepted. ;-), i know the fealing but do understand, we are trying to help out.. > > As you know, it very frustration to ask the same things again, and you showing them again > But now as you showed with all the configs. It is needed.. (sorry)

Hi Sven, Ok, before i back to my packaging, i reviewed the changes. You still missed a bit but it looks much better already, your completely there, but we will get there. And you really need to be more precise, why im telling that... Well the review. ( thats not all, im still reviewing the base only) ... https://up.tao.at/u/samba/graz-file.info2.txt Checking file:

On 11/17/2016 02:42 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:32:16 -0500 > Robert Martel via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> On 11/16/2016 04:34 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> Provided that the group urbanweb exists in /etc/group and your users >>> are shown by getent passwd or id, then you could try the unix

Greetings, I have Samba 4.4.7 running on several Sparc boxes running Solaris 9 as member servers in an Active Directory environment. (I do not control the AD configuration) I am able to connect to the servers using windows clients and smbclient - the problem I have run into is when I try to add domain users to local groups on the Samba servers I am told the users do not exist. As these

Let's assume that we have a network with: domain = "addomain.example.com" .1 - firewall server that runs BIND9, is not in the domain, but can resolve all DNS queries. It is setup to forward any queries for the "addomain.example.com" to the internal Samba4 server. .8 - Samba4 server (sernet packages on CentOS 6) running with integrated DNS in Active Directory mode.

Hello! I get the following message when I run the mi() function from the mi package. Error while imputing variable: c3 , model: mi.polr Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : could not find function "c14ordered" Here's the situation: I am running R v. 2.9.2 on Mac OSX v. 10.5.8. I am trying to impute missing data in a data set that I've trimmed down to 302 variables.

I'm trying to impute data using the mi package, but after running through almost the entire first round of imputations (which takes quite a while), it throws this error (I'll include the whole output prior to the error for context). Does anyone know what is causing it, or how I can fix it? More specifically, how can I tell what is throwing the error so I know what to fix? Is

On 18/01/15 18:27, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 18/01/15 18:10, Carlo wrote: >> Il 17/01/15 17:10, Rowland Penny ha scritto: >>> On 17/01/15 14:39, Carlo wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've got a samba 4.2 DC, which has worked well for about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a month

So, just wanting to verify - since I *think* I understand but am not sure. [The Wiki article might be clarified re: rfc2037 - and avoid questions like this.] 2037 only comes into play if you're interested in controlling local access for *nix users on the local file system. Thus, if you are, for example, setting up a [or a pair, or more] DC only, which won't have local users - than 2037

On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 23/06/15 18:58, Daniel Carrasco Mar?n wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've sucessfull created a secondary DC using the wiki manual ( >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC), and is working >> perfectly, user and groups are synced on both and I can use any of them >> for >> login using